PDA

View Full Version : 383 Madison Avenue - former Bear Stearns Building - by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill



Derek2k3
December 19th, 2001, 05:04 PM
The lights finally came on at the Bear Stearns Building yesterday but first here are some other pics from the ESB webcam



(Edited by Derek2k3 at 1:35 pm on Jan. 22, 2003)


(Edited by Derek2k3 at 1:36 pm on Jan. 22, 2003)

Rich Battista
December 19th, 2001, 05:55 PM
What a beautiful lighting of Bear Sterns. I believe it will revolutionize the city skyline. Can anyone answer my question about wheather or not i can see it from Astoria Queens???????????

Rich Battista
December 19th, 2001, 06:14 PM
I love the way that Bear Sterns is lit up at night, it makes a great addition to the NYC skyline. I have 2 questions, if someone can answer them!
1) *Can i see this building lit up at night from Astoria QUeens????
2) *I noticed that the Citicorp Building is not lit up anymore, what happened??????

If you can answe these please e-mail me at rmbattista@nyc.rr.com

ddny
December 20th, 2001, 12:59 AM
Hey...awsome pictures! What's the link to the ESB webcam?

noharmony
December 22nd, 2001, 01:11 AM
A link to Empire State Building webcam:

http://www.esbnyc.com/tourism/tourism_towercams.cfm

Derek2k3
January 22nd, 2003, 10:23 PM
Here are some more pictures from the SOM website of Bear Stearns. They are by Jeff Goldberg of Esto.

http://www.som.com/resources/projects/2/2/2/383madison_jg_e1_222.jpg

http://www.som.com/resources/projects/2/2/2/383madison_jg_e3_222.jpg

http://www.som.com/resources/projects/2/2/2/383madisonsm_e5_222.jpg

http://www.som.com/resources/projects/2/2/2/383_madisonsm_e9_222.jpg

http://www.som.com/resources/projects/2/2/2/383_madisonsm_e16_222.jpg

http://www.som.com/resources/projects/2/2/2/383madison_jg_e2_222.jpg

http://www.som.com/resources/projects/2/2/2/383_madisonsm_e14_222.jpg

http://www.som.com/resources/projects/2/2/2/383_madisonsm_e15_222.jpg

http://www.som.com/resources/projects/2/2/2/383_madisonsm_e8_222.jpg

http://www.som.com/resources/projects/2/2/2/383_madisonsm_e18_222.jpg

TLOZ Link5
January 23rd, 2003, 05:34 PM
Quite a hot building. *Although the shaft is a bit astylar, the crown is its redeeming quality. *However, I wish that it were a bit bulkier, with more stories—not necessarily taller, but it seems odd that a 700-footer would have less than 50 floors.

Fabb
January 23rd, 2003, 05:39 PM
Quote: from TLOZ Link5 on 4:34 pm on Jan. 23, 2003
it seems odd that a 700-footer would have less than 50 floors.

Right. But this is nothing compared to Goldman Sachs.

TLOZ Link5
January 23rd, 2003, 05:50 PM
Right. But this is nothing compared to Goldman Sachs. ~ Fabb

No doubts there. *;)

DominicanoNYC
January 23rd, 2003, 09:38 PM
I agree too. The Goldman Sachs building is amazing, but the Bear Stearns building is nice.

TLOZ Link5
January 23rd, 2003, 10:03 PM
On a related note, Trump Palace and CitySpire have begun floodlighting again. *Well, CitySpire had actually resumed a while ago, but TP started up again on Tuesday.

djcomlab
February 5th, 2003, 03:16 PM
Thanks Derek2k3 for all those great pics!

Does anyone know (or have some pics) of what is in the center of the crown? You can kind of see a structure in there but a top down photo would be nice.

djcomlab
February 10th, 2003, 02:18 PM
Since no one has pics, I would guess that it is a small rectangular structure that rises from the floor (starting at 2nd highest window level) to the top window level. You can kind of see through the glass in the first picture; which I assume houses a huge flood light system for illuminating the crown.

Edward
December 10th, 2003, 01:00 AM
Bear Stearns World Headquarters (http://www.wirednewyork.com/skyscrapers/383madison/default.htm) building - the view from the 64th floor of GE Building (http://www.wirednewyork.com/skyscrapers/ge/default.htm), with the Chrysler (http://www.wirednewyork.com/landmarks/chrysler/default.htm) and Metlife (http://www.wirednewyork.com/metlife.htm) buildings on the right.

http://www.wirednewyork.com/skyscrapers/383madison/images/bear_stearns_ge_8dec03.jpg (http://www.wirednewyork.com/skyscrapers/383madison/default.htm)

TLOZ Link5
December 10th, 2003, 01:38 AM
On a related note, Trump Palace and CitySpire have begun floodlighting again. Well, CitySpire had actually resumed a while ago, but TP started up again on Tuesday.

And a few weeks later, they both ceased. A year later, though, they're both back on.

emmeka
December 10th, 2003, 01:55 PM
It really is a gorgeous building.

Gulcrapek
December 10th, 2003, 03:28 PM
I wish Bear Stearns had a better location, it's a shame it can't be seen from a lot of places.

emmeka
December 11th, 2003, 11:10 AM
To me the skyline of new york is a composition that has to be carefully plotted so that things fit and look even better. I think that it is located in a great place.

Bob
October 29th, 2006, 09:05 AM
Take another look at Bear Stearns...this building is simply gorgeous. The curtain wall is outstanding. The massing of the building echoes the art-deco sensibilities of the 1920s and 30s. It plays perfectly off the nearby Pan Am (er..."Met Life") building. Had this building been built another 40 stories higher or so, you'd have your new Empire State Building.

Best view of Bear Stearns is from Top of the Rock.

ZippyTheChimp
October 29th, 2006, 09:53 AM
http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/982/totr044hn.th.jpg (http://img352.imageshack.us/my.php?image=totr044hn.jpg).

BPC
October 29th, 2006, 04:04 PM
I was admiring this building from a window at the Helmsley yesterday. I believe it to be the most beautiful office building put up in this City since the Modernists came to town. I wish I had seen it lit up.

Citytect
October 29th, 2006, 07:26 PM
What's in the middle part of this tower, just above the base? There are no lights on inside.

ablarc
October 29th, 2006, 08:04 PM
This building is so good looking Skidmore should have used it as the basis of the Freedom Tower design. Better than what we'll get.

londonlawyer
October 29th, 2006, 08:45 PM
It really is a gorgeous building.

I agree. This and the TWC are two of my favorite new buildings anywhere in the US. David Childs isn't so bad.

TREPYE
October 29th, 2006, 10:46 PM
This building is so good looking Skidmore should have used it as the basis of the Freedom Tower design. Better than what we'll get.

Yep. Its hard to believe that this is SOM work. It actually invokes a little bit of imagination and originality.

macreator
October 29th, 2006, 11:36 PM
I'm a sucker for postmodern and a great cap. I love this building. Just wish it had been a bit fatter and taller.

pianoman11686
October 30th, 2006, 01:15 AM
I used to think this building was underrated, but apparently, everyone likes it. It's always been one of my favorites. Too bad this forum wasn't around when it was first designed/constructed. Probably would have gotten a lot more coverage.

antinimby
October 30th, 2006, 02:41 AM
I'm a sucker for postmodern and a great cap. I love this building. Just wish it had been a bit fatter and taller.Taller yes, but certainly not fatter.

The tower portion seems well enough, however, that square-ish base is just too bland.
As far as SOM work, I'd still take One Worldwide Plaza over this one.

Derek2k3
November 3rd, 2006, 09:19 PM
I used to think this building was underrated, but apparently, everyone likes it. It's always been one of my favorites. Too bad this forum wasn't around when it was first designed/constructed. Probably would have gotten a lot more coverage.

The forum was around for later parts of its construction and SkyscraperPage covered it from the get-go. The threads were all deleted though.

londonlawyer
November 3rd, 2006, 10:04 PM
When did this forum start?

Derek2k3
November 3rd, 2006, 10:23 PM
The forum started in Spring/Summer 2000. I was just finishing my freshman year in high school. Bear Stearns started in 1999, finished 2001.

kz1000ps
November 4th, 2006, 03:02 AM
Just to back up the consensus, I really like this building too. It's a classic New York scraper cleanly executed, and it fits in no matter what angle you see it from. Like Macreator said, I'm a sucker for some good po-mo, and this fits the bill very nicely.

ablarc
November 4th, 2006, 11:24 AM
Just to back up the consensus, I really like this building too. It's a classic New York scraper cleanly executed, and it fits in no matter what angle you see it from. Like Macreator said, I'm a sucker for some good po-mo, and this fits the bill very nicely.
And, if you were so inclined, you could even think of it as just plain mo --like its neighbor, MetLife (PanAm). :)

kz1000ps
November 4th, 2006, 11:39 AM
Very true, although I'm not sure I'd be comfortable being associated with that..

Derek2k3
February 11th, 2007, 11:49 AM
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/143/344966622_3b9f5f9916_b.jpg
ballchaser1 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/38119863@N00/344966622/in/pool-65349892@N00/)
The dapper New York Times Building would look great among the business suits of Midtown East.


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/152/341588683_933794dcb4_b.jpg
ballchaser1 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/38119863@N00/344966622/in/pool-65349892@N00/)
Instead it has to compete with these.

ZippyTheChimp
February 11th, 2007, 12:36 PM
Look how well Met Life fits in.

Dynamicdezzy
February 11th, 2007, 02:37 PM
I used to work at Bear. The views there are amazing. I appreciated Metlife, GE and the Empire just a tad more. When work became a pain, I would simply go up to the library and reflect while looking down on the city.

tmac9wr
March 23rd, 2007, 12:12 AM
I actually like the fact that NYT Tower isn't in there with Bear Stearns and Co. One side is classy, more conservative designs...the other side is flashy and eye catching with lots of glass and points. I think it's cool that the two sides are designed in their own distinct ways, even newer buildings like Bear Stearns are designed in a certain way to stay in suit with its surroundings.

Fabrizio
March 23rd, 2007, 04:26 AM
Zippy: "Look how well Met Life fits in."

Classy, effortless.

TREPYE
March 23rd, 2007, 02:20 PM
Look how well Met Life fits in.


Zippy: "Look how well Met Life fits in."

Classy, effortless.

Yeah real well.:rolleyes::rolleyes: Also, notice how "effortlessly" with all that shameless bulk it completely blocks the Chrysler Building. :(

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/143/344966622_3b9f5f9916_b.jpg

BPC
March 23rd, 2007, 02:31 PM
Notice also how the only acceptable shots of the MetLife Building are ones taken from clear across town. I suppose it looks even better from the surface of the moon.

USSManhattan
March 23rd, 2007, 05:37 PM
Yeah real well.:rolleyes::rolleyes: Also, notice how "effortlessly" with all that shameless bulk it completely blocks the Chrysler Building. :(

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/143/344966622_3b9f5f9916_b.jpg

Well, you can at least see the Chrysler's spire...

Fabrizio
March 23rd, 2007, 06:39 PM
What a shame the way the GE building blocks St. Patricks.

BigMac
October 24th, 2007, 01:31 AM
dallasjlogan on Flickr
July 31, 2007

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1032/1095425386_f9b984836d_b.jpg

RandySavage
January 19th, 2008, 06:42 PM
Does anyone know where I can find renderings of the Travelstead Tower by KPF that was proposed for this spot in the 80s? Thanks.

Derek2k3
January 19th, 2008, 07:09 PM
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2071/2204987374_59a9e58841_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2087/2204987380_3cbec6d2c0_o.jpg

RandySavage
January 19th, 2008, 07:18 PM
Thanks, Derek! I'm going to have find something that can stump you.

Alonzo-ny
January 19th, 2008, 07:22 PM
So sad.

stache
January 19th, 2008, 07:23 PM
This looks like it would have been taller, yes?

Alonzo-ny
January 19th, 2008, 07:25 PM
That proposal was a 1000ftr as far as i know.

Tectonic
January 19th, 2008, 10:01 PM
Looks kinda scary to me.

Dagrecco82
January 19th, 2008, 10:23 PM
Looks like a Transformer to me.

BrooklynLove
January 19th, 2008, 10:47 PM
looks like a titan rocket. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Titan2_color_silo.jpg

macreator
January 20th, 2008, 02:01 AM
Was this project not built due to economic reasons, or was it the height that hurt it?

pianoman11686
January 20th, 2008, 03:24 AM
I think it met the same fate as the original Columbus Circle proposal when commercial real estate went south in the late '80s.

Tectonic
January 20th, 2008, 09:58 AM
And the original proposal for what became the Lehman Brothers building.
https://community.emporis.com/wm/bu/?lng=3&id=133105

Is there a scrapped projects thread?

Derek2k3
January 20th, 2008, 12:44 PM
Good idea.

ablarc
January 20th, 2008, 12:50 PM
Was this project not built due to economic reasons, or was it the height that hurt it?
They had a brief spell of good taste --just long enough to kill it.





Pointlessly overdecorated.

Alonzo-ny
January 20th, 2008, 01:20 PM
And the original proposal for what became the Lehman Brothers building.
https://community.emporis.com/wm/bu/?lng=3&id=133105

Is there a scrapped projects thread?

This link leads to a sign in page for emporis?

stache
January 20th, 2008, 01:35 PM
There's a pipe dream thread -

Tectonic
January 20th, 2008, 03:08 PM
Sorry about the link. Lehman was supposed to be Rockefeller Plaza West

https://community.emporis.com/images/5/2001/11/133500.gif

BrooklynLove
March 16th, 2008, 06:38 PM
a more accurate name would be the new york fed building.

anyway, assuming that jpm were to acquire at least some of what remains of bear, it's a large to step from there to conclude that jpm would no longer want/need the new building downtown.

BrooklynLove
March 16th, 2008, 10:04 PM
my lord - $2 a share or $236 million to buy them. hard to believe how close this company got to being a net negative. to put things into perspective, bear's building had been roughly valued at $1.2 billion, so do the math if you're trying to value bear's business at close of this deal.

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/BUSINESS/03/16/stearns.morgan/

BrooklynLove
March 17th, 2008, 11:10 PM
ahem.

http://www.wirednewyork.com/forum/showpost.php?p=221066&postcount=642

NoyokA
March 26th, 2008, 08:11 PM
Discuss the Bear Stearns fallout here...

http://www.wirednewyork.com/forum/showthread.php?t=17493

brianac
May 24th, 2008, 04:22 PM
Showdown in Midtown! Lawsuit Takes Bear Stearns to Task Over 383 Madison

by Dana Rubinstein (http://www.observer.com/2008/author/dana-rubinstein) | May 23, 2008

http://www.observer.com/files/imagecache/vertical/files/383madison.jpg C R via flickr

JPMorgan Chase's takeover of one-time investment giant Bear Stearns just got that much messier.

The Wall Street Journal reports today that 383 Madison LLC, the owner of the land on which Bear Stearns built its headquarters at 383 Madison Avenue, is suing Bear Stearns for violating a written agreement that allows the LLC to get first dibs on the building in the event of a sale:

"At no time did Bear Stearns even attempt to honor its contractual duties to plaintiff, which would have required providing plaintiff with notice of the potential agreement with JPMorgan and engaging in negotiations with plaintiff relating to the purchase of the building," the lawsuit said.



...383 Madison LLC says the fair market value of the building exceeds $1.1 billion and it should be able to purchase the building for the same price J.P. Morgan Chase would pay.


JPMorgan Chase is also named in the lawsuit, which was filed in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan.

A spokesman for JPMorgan said the suit had "no merit." A Bear Stearns spokesperson could not be reached for comment.

Read about the brouhaha here (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121151299810116695.html).

http://www.observer.com/2008/showdown-midtown-lawsuit-takes-bear-stearns-task-breach-contract

© 2008 Observer Media Group

Jake
May 24th, 2008, 11:35 PM
The interesting thing here is that the sale of Bear Stearns only happened as a result of many assurances being made by federal regulators that the deal would not face obstacles. The question here is: will the word of the fed supersede (or even have merit at all) in New York courts?

JPM should be able to keep the building regardless of anything Bear had previously agreed to.

BrooklynLove
May 24th, 2008, 11:53 PM
this is the type of thing that happens when you do dilligence after a deal instead of before it. how would you like to be a fly in dimon's office when he calls the govt and asks for indemnification in this suit? even if the plaintiff has a technical claim here i don't know what their remedy is as a practical matter - a court is not going to order that they get the building for 1.1bill. maybe the court would do a market appraisal and give the plaintiff anything over the 1.1bill.

lofter1
May 25th, 2008, 09:22 AM
Could the Feds use Eminent Domain to take the BS Building and thereby cancel out the previous & seemingly legally-binding agreement :confused:

stache
May 25th, 2008, 10:03 AM
I suppose they could try...

BrooklynLove
May 25th, 2008, 11:29 AM
Could the Feds use Eminent Domain to take the BS Building and thereby cancel out the previous & seemingly legally-binding agreement :confused:

"could" and "would" are very far apart in this instance. not going to happen.

lofter1
May 25th, 2008, 12:13 PM
So the JPM gang and their Fed friends will just have to go shopping for a friendly judge who will void the prior 383 Madison / BS agreement ...

:cool:

BrooklynLove
May 25th, 2008, 07:39 PM
force majeure

lofter1
May 25th, 2008, 08:26 PM
wishful thinking ^

... force majeure (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure) is not intended to excuse negligence (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligence) or other malfeasance (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malfeasance) of a party, as where non-performance is caused by the usual and natural consequences of external forces (e.g., predicted rain stops an outdoor event), or where the intervening circumstances are specifically contemplated.

BrooklynLove
May 26th, 2008, 10:18 AM
wishful thinking ^

... force majeure (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_majeure) is not intended to excuse negligence (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligence) or other malfeasance (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malfeasance) of a party, as where non-performance is caused by the usual and natural consequences of external forces (e.g., predicted rain stops an outdoor event), or where the intervening circumstances are specifically contemplated.

i've seen force majeure provisions drafted broadly enough to encompass catastrophes of the sort that lead to the bear buyout (run on the bank). anyway i doubt that things will come to this. we don't really know what the agreement says, and i suspect that jpm and bear looked into the building purchase carefully during the w/e that lead up to the announced deal. even with extremely compressed diligence, a component this central to the deal could have been analyzed thoroughly - each bank has RE groups that would've been loooking at this qustion almost exclusively.

lofter1
May 26th, 2008, 10:27 AM
"analyzed throughly" :confused:

Remember we're talking about folks who thought it was a great deal to bundle & sell garbage mortgages. No doubt they "analyzed" that situation as well. And we know where that got them (and us).

BrooklynLove
May 26th, 2008, 04:04 PM
"analyzed throughly" :confused:

Remember we're talking about folks who thought it was a great deal to bundle & sell garbage mortgages. No doubt they "analyzed" that situation as well. And we know where that got them (and us).

apples and oranges. anyway, you should be pointing your finger at the entities who fraudulently originated the garbage assets and sold them to wall street, not the broker-dealers who bundled and traded them.

lofter1
May 26th, 2008, 06:49 PM
But they were supposedly experts in matters of finance. They should have known what they were buying.

If those guys in the big firms can be so easily duped then what kind of expertise can they claim in matters of real estate?

BrooklynLove
May 26th, 2008, 07:10 PM
the loan agreements were fraudulent - contained false info re the borrowers. only in hindsight does one now say the banks should've investigated the borrower, lender and property - which would make the whole mbs market unworkable anyhow - this paper is backed by pools of huge amounts of loans. take away the mbs market and you're looking at 10+% mortgage rates again. it's not the banks' place to prevent fraudulent lending practices - that responsility falls on the regulators.

brianac
May 29th, 2008, 05:32 PM
Bear’s Cayne Apologizes, but He Hears Only Silence

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/05/30/business/30bearsub600.jpg Emmanuel Dunand/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
A former Bear Stearns employee added his own message to an unflattering portrait of the investment bank’s chairman, James E. Cayne, painted by Geoffrey Raymond and displayed in front of Bear’s headquarters in New York.

By LANDON THOMAS Jr. (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_jr_thomas/index.html?inline=nyt-per)
Published: May 30, 2008

On a day that marked the end of Bear Stearns (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/bear_stearns_companies/index.html?inline=nyt-org) as an independent investment bank, the firm’s shareholders voted in support of its controversial, government-backed merger with JP Morgan (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/morgan_j_p_chase_and_company/index.html?inline=nyt-org).

But the outcome, which was announced at a 10:00 meeting this morning at Bear’s headquarters at 383 Madison Avenue, reflected less an embrace of the deal by bruised investors than the stark reality that the $10 price was the best option available.

More than two months after the terms were struck in mid-March, and with more than 7,000 employees expected to lose their jobs, Bear Stearns, which opened in 1923, is now fully incorporated within J.P. Morgan.

The tally in support of the merger is expected to be more than 80 percent and the deal will officially close on Friday.

The somber tone of Thursday’s gathering stood in stark contrast to the angry sentiments of Bear employees and shareholders in mid-March, most of whom felt that that Bear, known as the scrappiest firm on Wall Street, could have survived if it had been given earlier access to credit lines from the Federal Reserve.

James E. Cayne (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/james_e_cayne/index.html?inline=nyt-per), Bear’s chairman who lost more than $900 million in the firm’s collapse, presided over the meeting at the firm’s auditorium, which was filled with more than 400 employees. Sitting next to him was Alan Schwartz, Bear’s chief executive.

Mr. Cayne, who joined the firm in 1969, had been conspicuously absent in March when the chief executive of JP Morgan James Dimon (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/d/james_dimon/index.html?inline=nyt-per) presided over a stormy meeting in the same venue. Mr. Cayne’s presence now was a powerful reminder to the Bear Stearns community that the fight was over.

“I have no anger, only regret,” he said, as he departed from the script of his prepared remarks. “14,000 families were affected. I personally apologize. I feel an enormous amount of pain and management feels an enormous amount of pain.”

The audience of employees, directors and investors, many of who he has known for over 30 years and who lost large parts of their savings and fortunes, received his remarks in a dead silence.

“That which does not kill you makes you stronger,” he added. “And at this point we are all like Hercules.”

Again, his words were met with silence.

“J.P. Morgan is a great organization,” he concluded. “There are better days ahead.”

And with that, the meeting, which lasted no more than 10 minutes, was over and Bear’s employees headed quietly off to work.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/30/business/30bear.html?ref=business

Copyright 2008 (http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/copyright.html) The New York Times Company (http://www.nytco.com/)

Tectonic
September 11th, 2008, 10:04 PM
Has the name of this building changed?

BrooklynLove
September 12th, 2008, 08:44 AM
Oh yeah - less than a week after the deal closed.

Tectonic
September 12th, 2008, 10:17 AM
what is it now? JP Morgan Chase- 383 Madison?

Walked by this week, and saw JP Morgan on a sign at the base, but it was at night so I didn't pay much attention.

BrooklynLove
September 13th, 2008, 07:54 AM
No, just JP Morgan - stencilling is on the glass that's currently behind the shed. JP Morgan is the legacy investment bank/broker-dealer.

lofter1
April 19th, 2009, 05:17 PM
This week, in late day spring light ...

http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p242/Lofter1/Midtown/IMG_3492.jpg

http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p242/Lofter1/Midtown/IMG_3485.jpg

http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p242/Lofter1/Midtown/IMG_3489.jpg

383 Madison

BrooklynRider
April 19th, 2009, 06:56 PM
Love that last photo.

lofter1
April 19th, 2009, 07:18 PM
The cab drivers on Madison weren't too crazy about it.

But I stood there until I got it :cool:

ablarc
April 25th, 2009, 10:31 AM
^ Risking life and limb for that perfect shot. As a photographer, you've come a long way. lofter.

Derek2k3
September 4th, 2010, 10:09 AM
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4103/4953688279_f81da61dc0_o.jpg
antongorbov (http://www.flickr.com/photos/antongorbov/4953688279/sizes/o/in/photostream/)


http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4112/4954279794_01993b78b8_o.jpg
Large: antongorbov (http://www.flickr.com/photos/antongorbov/4954279794/sizes/o/in/photostream/)


http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4090/4953688443_dd96a10068_o.jpg
Large: http://www.flickr.com/photos/antongorbov/4953688443/sizes/o/in/photostream/

Alonzo-ny
September 5th, 2010, 11:11 AM
Always liked the building. A great little building which is very simple, and importantly is not all glass.