PDA

View Full Version : Uptown Moving Upscale


Kris
March 26th, 2004, 10:39 PM
March 28, 2004

Uptown Moving Upscale

By JOSH BARBANEL

http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/2004/03/28/realestate/cov.184.1.650.jpg
View from the apartment of Vivian Ducat on the top floor of the Riviera on Riverside Drive at West 157th Street.

WITH apartment prices rising across Manhattan, Vivian Ducat, a documentary filmmaker and creator of multimedia Web presentations, found the home of her dreams on the top floor of the Riviera, an aging but opulent building on Riverside Drive at West 157th Street, built in 1910 on a site where John James Audubon had an estate in the early 19th century.

From the windows of her newly refinished oak-paneled dining room, Ms. Ducat can look out at the Empire State Building, and then she can wander down a long parquet hallway to her bedroom and watch the sun set behind the George Washington Bridge. The price was $650,000 for 1,600 square feet of space, including a butler's pantry and a maid's room. Only a decade ago this was a jarringly high sum for most Manhattan apartments, but today it is a fraction of what a similar apartment would cost farther downtown.

At a time when the average two-bedroom apartment in the rest of Manhattan is selling for more than $1 million, price-numbed refugees like Ms. Ducat have been making the trek uptown to Harlem, Hamilton Heights, Washington Heights and Inwood, places once off the map of many brokers and buyers, to find more space at a lower cost, driving up prices of co-ops and condominiums there, too.

A new study of a decade of apartment sales illustrates this trend. It found that prices in the parts of Manhattan dense with co-ops and condominiums — below 96th Street on the East Side and 116th Street on the West Side — have more than doubled from 1993, when the city was emerging from a real estate downturn, through 2003, with average prices rising from $444,000 to $1.06 million.

But in the last four years, the study showed, the rate of the rise in these traditional Manhattan co-op and condo neighborhoods has slowed, while uptown prices have soared as more and more buyers, once deterred by abandonment, crime and longer commuting times have looked northward. Sales north of 96th Street on the East Side and 116th Street on the West Side, which currently account for 4 percent of apartment sales in Manhattan, are at their highest prices on record, though far below prices in other neighborhoods.

The market survey, by Jonathan Miller of the Miller Samuel appraisal firm, found that since 2000, when the economy and the stock market hit a peak, co-op and condominium prices per square foot in northern Manhattan have risen 63 percent, while prices elsewhere in Manhattan — which started from higher dollar figures — have risen by an average of 26 percent. Prices below 14th Street have risen by 33 percent, followed by 28 percent on the West Side and 19 percent on the East Side.

Mr. Miller said that while demand for multimillion-dollar luxury apartments has picked up in the last few months, demand for more moderately priced condos and co-ops has been strong for most of the last few years. Powering the rise in prices was a combination of low interest rates, increasing demand and a smaller inventory of apartments for sale, as many long-term renters decided to buy — with increasing numbers of buyers venturing northward in search of affordable apartments.

"There has been a surge in activity at the entry level, and it continued to 2003," Mr. Miller said. "We saw improvements despite a weak economy, and this was largely fueled by historically low interest rates."

The report also documents a 7.5 percent decline last year in the number of sales across Manhattan, as fewer owners put their apartments up for sale. The limited supply of apartments helped push up prices, but brokers and economists disagree on the cause. Economists say the low inventory is a sign of a weakness in the economy. Brokers say the market is so strong that owners are afraid to put their apartments on the market until they have already found a new property to buy.

Rae D. Rosen, a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said that a sluggish job market has meant fewer people moving in and out of New York, and therefore a lower supply of apartments for sale. "Prices get bid up anyway," she said, "because the city remains such a magnet and a place that people want to be."

Steven James, a senior executive vice president at Douglas Elliman, who supervises 300 brokers, said the shrinking inventory of apartment listings had contributed to the price rise and a return of a frenzy of bidding wars this winter "every week, sometimes daily."

He described two one-bedroom apartments in postwar buildings — one in Union Square, one in the West 70's — offered for more than $600,000, with each attracting six or seven bids. "Isn't it sad," he said, "that a one-bedroom at $625,000 is the low end."

Northern Migration
Driven Uptown by Price Pressure

But it is just such price pressure that has driven many buyers who want to stay in Manhattan to look farther and farther uptown.

Throughout the 1990's there has a gradually awakening of interest in uptown Manhattan, as middle-class buyers rediscovered brownstone neighborhoods in Harlem, taking chances on areas that were often perceived as too close to the edge of crime, drug trafficking and decay. For much of this period co-op and condominium prices remained flat.

But over the last four years, brokers say, prices across upper Manhattan began rising in co-ops and condominiums too, as first a wave of people in the arts — artists, musicians, theater people — moved in, followed by a more eclectic and increasingly affluent mix of accountants, architects, schoolteachers and business people.

Many had been renting for years farther downtown, saving up their down payment on an apartment. Without equity in an existing condo or co-op to sell, some buyers do not have enough cash to enter the regular Manhattan apartment game, brokers say. Last year, two-bedroom apartments in upper Manhattan averaged $340,000, but brokers say prices have continued to rise this year.

Mark Jordan, a corporate recruiter, and his partner, Daniel Chisholm, a French teacher at the Collegiate School, spent a year looking to move from their rented studio on West End Avenue in the 70's. They wanted quiet and light and a real kitchen, "not a Bunsen burner in a closet," Mr. Jordan said. These were nonnegotiable, he said.

On the West Side, they found they could afford two tiny rooms, with windows facing walls. Then, Mr. Chisholm went apartment hunting for a friend who was moving back to New York City and discovered Washington Heights.

He found a neighborhood, identified by brokers and neighborhood groups as Hudson Heights, a sliver of land that rises up along the Hudson, west of Broadway, between J. Hood Wright Park at 173rd Street and Fort Tryon Park, that was spared much of the decay that eroded many neighborhoods in the 1960's and 1970's.

Now they are preparing to close on a four-room co-op in a 1930's Art Deco building on Pinehurst Avenue and West 187th Street. They have a separate dining room, a sunken living room and a shared rooftop deck. The price is $310,000 with maintenance of $566 a month.

They were taken with the neighborliness of the streets, the new restaurants that had opened in the last few years and Frank's Gourmet Market, which while "not Zabar's" had enough exotic cheeses and other delicacies to make them feel they were not leaving Manhattan for the wilderness.

"The more we went to the neighborhood, the more we liked it," Mr. Jordan said. "The apartments were pretty big, there was less noise and people seemed less hurried and stressed. People say hello to each other on the street."

The Neighborhoods
Renewal Comes in Different Styles

Upper Manhattan includes a mix of different neighborhoods with different demographics, histories, housing stock and styles of condominium and co-op apartments. In Harlem and Hamilton Heights, a neighborhood to the west of Harlem, there are a mix of older co-ops and newer condos and co-ops in renovated or new buildings, as the neighborhood goes through a period of renewal.

Many of the new buildings were built with government subsidies or on low-cost land, through the city's Department of Housing Preservation and Development, and include a mix of market rate and subsidized apartments for sale. For the subsidized units there are income limits, typically $104,000 a year for a family of four, though most buyers to date have had far lower incomes, housing officials say.

Within the next few years hundreds of additional co-ops and condominiums will be completed, in buildings from 119th Street in East Harlem to Frederick Douglass Boulevard in Central Harlem to Bradhurst Avenue and 145th Street, according to Susan Ponce de Leon, a director of program operations for the department.

In Mr. Miller's market study, which includes sales of apartments with income restrictions, prices averaged $340,000 last year for two-bedroom apartments in Harlem.

At the Rosa Parks, a new six-story red-brick building, with penthouses, set to open this spring at 163 St. Nicholas Avenue at West 118th Street, all 64 condominiums sold out quickly, according to Natasha Sinkov, a broker at Douglas Elliman, even in the face of several price increases. She said contracts had been signed for market-rate two-bedroom apartments for as much as $440,000, while a three-bedroom penthouse duplex with a 1,200-square-foot private terrace went to contract at $670,000. Prices in some of the building's units were kept lower to keep them affordable, under an agreement between the developer and the city, which provided land for the project.

Farther north, Broadway has always been the dividing line, with high-quality housing built for the upper middle classes to the west near the river and the more utilitarian middle-class and working-class housing to the east, according to Andrew S. Dolkart, an associate professor at Columbia University who teaches and writes about architectural history and preservation in Manhattan. The co-op and condo markets are centered on the west side of Broadway.

Last week, Joel Levin and his wife, Tara Collins, were still unpacking boxes in their ground-floor apartment in a four-story building at Hudson View Gardens, with a view across to the Palisades out of a rear bedroom window. Their building faces a garden and stone retaining wall, on a perpetually quiet landscaped private street.

They paid $361,000 for a 1,100-square-foot two-bedroom apartment with a remodeled kitchen and a Sub-Zero refrigerator and were just getting to know their new neighborhood. Hudson View Gardens is a development with 453 apartments in 15 Tudor-style buildings at Pinehurst Avenue and West 183rd Street. It opened in 1924, as one of the first co-op developments in Manhattan.

For Mr. Levin, the location was ideal. He teaches and runs the computer lab at the Fieldston School in Riverdale. She is a lawyer at Legal Aid Society with an office in Lower Manhattan, at the other end of the island. They wanted to stay in Manhattan to avoid what they feared would have been a two-hour commute for one or the other if they had moved to Brooklyn or Riverdale.

They had been paying $1,433 for a rent-stabilized 750-square-foot apartment on West 110th Street near Broadway, the rent low enough to allow them to begin accumulating a down payment. "For years people were telling us the real estate market was going to drop, but we were watching and waiting for eight years," Mr. Levin said.

But by the time they started looking, it was too late for the Upper West Side. So they found a new neighborhood, Hudson Heights, that felt like a quiet Brooklyn neighborhood, but hard by the city. Mr. Levin said there are no washing machines or dryers allowed in apartments, and until the electricity is upgraded, they are permitted to use only low-power air-conditioners.

One 900-square-foot apartment at Hudson View Gardens tracked by Mr. Miller, sold for $50,000 in 1994 and then doubled in price to $118,000 four years later. Last spring, it sold again for $330,000, a sixfold increase in a decade.

Simone Yen Song, a broker in Washington Heights since the mid-1980's, watched co-op prices drop in the early 90's and then witnessed the rebound over the last five years. She said many Manhattanites were scared off by their fears of longer commutes and the perception that Washington Heights is a dangerous place.

Even when Washington Heights had a reputation as a regional drug center, she said, the neighborhood remained stable, never abandoned by the middle class and working people who lived there. "There are perceptions that were never true," she said. "Washington Heights is 50 blocks. This immediate neighborhood has never been close to the drugs. People thought this neighborhood was too far away, until they got on the subway and realized it is 20 minutes to Midtown."

Just across the street from Mr. Levin's home and closer to the river is Castle Village, which opened in 1938 with 579 apartments in a series of 14-story towers set on open lawns with a promenade overlooking the river. Another large co-op development, Park Terrace Gardens, is in Inwood near Inwood Hill Park and the northern tip of Manhattan. Built before World War II, it has 400 hilltop apartments in five buildings.

Not everyone moving northward is a first-time home buyer. Ms. Song told of one buyer, a C.P.A. and investor, and his wife, who paid $630,000 a few years ago for a 2,300-square-foot double apartment in Castle Village with sweeping views of the Hudson and then spent several hundred thousand dollars renovating it, far more than the couple had expected.

But unlike many other purchasers moving northward, they were downsizing. They had just sold a 4,000-square-foot loft in Astor Place, where they had lived for 20 years, for $2 million, and they were searching for a smaller place that was still large enough to hang their art collection.

Living closer to the George Washington Bridge makes the trip to their golf club in New Jersey more convenient, and they were still only 20 minutes from Carnegie Hall and Lincoln Center.

Inventory Dwindles
`We Don't Have Much Product'

As in the rest of Manhattan, the supply of apartments on the market in upper Manhattan dwindled last year — but far more steeply, falling 25 percent, according to Mr. Miller's analysis.

Gus Perry, the principal broker of Stein-Perry Real Estate in Washington Heights, attributed this to a spike in prices in 2002, which brought out a rush of sellers trying to take advantage of the higher prices. Now, "We don't have much product," he said. "Anything that comes on the market in a nice building is basically name your price."

Uptown living does have some inconveniences. In some neighborhoods there are few services and residents are forced to do most of their shopping elsewhere. There are still shells of buildings and vacant lots in some neighborhoods, standing as silent reminders of a troubled past. Crime and open drug sales have sharply declined as they have across the city, but the police are still under pressure in many communities to do more.

With the quality of many local schools lagging, many new residents send their children to private schools and public schools outside the neighborhood. But brokers say, discerning parents can find some higher quality schools or parent-supported alternative programs.

For example, Public School 187 on Cabrini Boulevard is a highly regarded traditional K-8 school. In Inwood, the Muscota New School, an alternative program at P.S. 176 has attracted interest, while the Hamilton Heights Academy is a small parent-founded alternative program in P.S. 28 on West 155th Street now in its second year. Groups of parents are working on other new schools and programs as well.

The perils and promises of the uptown co-op market are evident along upper Riverside Drive, where Ms. Ducat now lives with her husband, Ray Segal, a documentary film producer, and two sons on the 12th floor of an ornate 1910 building with a vast marble lobby and 202 apartments that follows a curve along Riverside Drive from West 156th Street to West 157th Street.

Ms. Ducat grew up on West 72nd Street near Riverside Drive and after some stints in Boston and abroad, returned to live in the 80's on the West Side. But for a decade she yearned for more space in classic old New York apartment building, just across from where she now lives. It was 1992, a time when the New York co-op market was in the doldrums. Ms. Ducat saw an ad in The Westsider, a neighborhood weekly for an apartment in the Grinnell, an eight-story building topped by corner towers at 800 Riverside Drive.

There was a 10-room apartment available, with high ceilings, and butler's and maid's rooms. But her husband said no. He had lived years before on the Lower East Side and knew, he said, what it was like to live in a bad neighborhood. She thought of that apartment often over the years.

Last May, Ms. Ducat, an executive editor at Columbia University Digital Knowledge Ventures, a group in the university that develops Internet-based courses and presentations, idly typed the name "Grinnell" into Google and rekindled a passion and a quest that led to the purchase of her apartment across the street.

Her new apartment had been renovated by Michael Laudati, a movie makeup artist who frequently works with Harrison Ford. In his spare time, Mr. Laudati buys and restores historic properties in authentic styles. He said he worked on Ms. Ducat's apartment over the course of more than a year, stripping, rebuilding and refinishing cabinets, doors and woodwork and matching period lighting.

During the years that Ms. Ducat pined after a grand old apartment, the neighborhood of her dreams had gone through some extraordinary transformations as well. Jude Dayani, a broker with Orsid Realty who lives in the Riviera said that the entire building had been purchased for about $1 million in 1980 and converted to a co-op in 1985, in the midst of the conversion frenzy.

Values rose and fell and rose again. One six-room apartment on the eighth floor tracked by Mr. Miller sold for $149,000 in 1987 and then sold again in 1993 at foreclosure for $23,000. But earlier this year it was sold a third time for $520,000.

The only apartment now on the market is a one-bedroom unit on the 11th floor with an asking price of $465,000, Ms. Dayani said.

In light of the rising prices, it seems possible that many once elegant rental buildings along Riverside Drive could be candidates for conversions to condominiums in the future.

Now Ms. Ducat has a stack of articles and books about the history and architecture of her chosen neighborhood in a prominent place in her built-in bookcases. In her dining room, she now has space to display possessions long locked away in cabinets: a colorful fruit bowl, a sculpture brought back from her travels in Zimbabwe years ago.

She is a volunteer with a group, Uptown Treasures, that promotes cultural institutions from Hamilton Heights to Inwood, though, she said, she never thought of doing anything like that while living on the West Side. She has come to believe that her new neighborhood, with its mix of cultures and languages, is more authentically New York, than her old neighborhood on the West Side is today.

"Now," she said, "Broadway in the West 80's might as well be suburban, with Coach leather, Godiva chocolate and Victoria's Secret." Her new neighborhood, she said, "reminds me of the Upper West Side of the 1960's."

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company

krulltime
May 27th, 2004, 11:03 AM
Central Park North: Bargain on the Green

By Adelle Waldman, May 2004

Central Park views are among the priciest in the city - unless you're talking about the views from Central Park North, which has long been cast in the role of poor relation to the park's other, swankier peripheries to the east, south and west.

But that's starting to change, as more middle-class buyers and renters converge on Central Park North, enjoying large spaces and views of both the park and midtown for prices that are a fraction of those paid by their neighbors across the green, brokers say.

"Until the past few years, there was still a stigma to the area," said Stephen Kliegerman, director of project marketing at Halstead Property. The firm recently handled the conversion of the Washington Irving mansion on the corner of 112th Street into 133 high-end condos.

"Now rents on Central Park North are much closer to regular parkside," Kliegerman said.

Of course, there is still a long way to go before prices on the northern side of the park catch up to Central Park South and the prime real estate along Fifth Avenue and Central Park West.

Kliegerman said space on Central Park South costs about two-and-a-half times as much as space on the northern end of the park. But five years ago, the difference between north and south was closer to a 5-to-1 ratio.

Even a year ago, space on Central Park North went for about $425 a square foot, though it is now up to about $525 or $600 a square foot, said Tony Oakley, a vice president at the Corcoran Group. Oakley and business partner Larry Comroe, also a vice president at Corcoran, are handling the sale of 16 apartments on West 117th St. Street between Seventh and Eighth Avenues.

An indication of how much the neighborhood at the top of the park has changed is the fact that every one of those condos starts at over a $1 million, Oakley said.

He said the neighborhood's transformation began with Harlem townhouses, which became destination for frustrated would-be buyers to the west.

"The real job happened with the townhouse market," he said. "People who were losing out on condos in the Upper West Side began moving into Harlem to get more space for the money."

Now, it's spread to apartment buildings, including condo conversions and rental buildings in which apartments are renovated one by one, Oakley said. "As the older tenants move out, landlords have been upgrading," he said.

The area has convenient access to a number of subway lines, including the B and C trains on the park's northwest corner, the 2 and 3 trains in the middle of the park and the 4, 5 and 6 lines to the east. The neighborhood is seeing more coffee shops, bakeries and local shops open as it becomes more desirable, he said.

"The area has been gentrified," Kliegerman agreed. "As New York continues to prosper, neighborhoods that have not are starting to catch up to the rest of the market."

Copyright 2003-2004 The Real Deal.

krulltime
June 23rd, 2004, 02:44 AM
Upper West Side Retail Creeps Upward


By Adelle Waldman
June 22, 2004

Once upon a time, Morningside Heights, near the 116th Street campus of Columbia University, was part of the great beyond, at least from a retail broker's perspective. But today, the character of the Upper West Side is creeping upwards, past the traditional 96th Street boundary, while Morningside Heights is moving down.

With the addition of large new condo buildings in between, the area "is becoming one big stretch," says Andrew Goldberg, an executive vice president at CB Richard Ellis.

The result? A rapidly changing retail climate.

Neighborhood supermarkets are the unlikely but illustrative nexus of the two areas, says Scott Edlitz, managing director of Robert K. Futterman & Associates. In recent months, there has been an exodus of traditional grocers, as high-end natural food purveyors have moved onto Broadway north of 96th Street.

"There's been a lot of shuffling around," he says.

Across the street from the Columbia gates, a swanky Morton Edwards opened its doors, while the West Side Market down the street closed its doors. Gourmet Garage has also opened for business on Broadway and 97th Street.

One factor prompting a retail upgrade is that new condo buildings offer big retail spaces on the ground floors, Goldberg says.

"Out go some of the older tenants and in come the nationals," he says.

Edlitz says retail rents in the neighborhood have not skyrocketed, but have risen at a rate consistent with other parts of the city, and are now in the range of $110 to $140 per square foot.

"But the quality and the credit of the tenants has gone up," he says.

One example: Two years ago, the New York Sports Club, Starbucks and Symphony Space moved into a large new space on Broadway and 94th that would have once been considered simply the edge of the Upper West Side. Now it's seen as mainstream, despite its northern location, brokers say.

Still, no one seems to be expecting the stretch of Broadway between 96th Street and Columbia to look like it does in the 70s and low 80s, dotted with stores such as The Gap, Victoria's Secret and Ann Taylor.

At this point, there doesn't seem to be a need for the fashion retailers that have set up shop farther south, Edlitz says. "You see more service types of businesses," he says.

But as Broadway becomes stronger, some destination retail tenants are considering spaces on Columbus Avenue past 96th Street, a territory that only recently was considered desirable, Edlitz says.

"There are fewer and fewer spaces on Broadway," he says. "It's a continuation of growth."


Copyright 2003-2004 The Real Deal.

krulltime
July 2nd, 2004, 12:00 AM
TRY THE VIEW FROM THE TOP


By ADELLE WALDMAN

Think only millionaires can afford apartments that face Central Park? Think again - the park has four sides.

While Fifth Avenue, Central Park South and Central Park West have long been highly desirable, Central Park North is finally coming into its own.

Today, the street at the top of the park - also known as 110th Street or Cathedral Parkway - is a hot spot for middle-class families and singles. And the prices make tree-starved residents of more established neighborhoods gape.

Just ask Mary-Kate Yost.

Until last fall, she lived on 92nd Street on the Upper East Side. Now, she and a roommate share a large two-bedroom with park views at 225 W. 110th St.

For $2,250 a month, Yost and her roommate live in a prewar building with laundry in the basement. Their apartment was renovated just before they moved in. In addition to 10-foot ceilings, it has hardwood floors, granite countertops and a dishwasher.

Not to mention views of the park from the living room.

"Here you can see the seasons. Living on the Upper East Side, all you had was cement," says Yost, who works in administration at an accounting firm. "It's 100 percent better."


UP MEANS DOWN

Yost mentions that she had looked at smaller, pricier apartments in neighborhoods to the south.

"We saw a one-bedroom in a high-rise that didn't have nearly as much character, and we would have had to build a temporary wall," she says. In addition, that apartment, which was in Hell's Kitchen, cost $2,800 a month, $550 more than what they are paying now.

In terms of convenience, Yost, who works near Times Square, has no complaints. She may be farther north than many of her co-workers, but Central Park North is convenient to both the 2, 3 and B, C trains, giving her an enviable 20-minute commute.

Catherine Perry, who works for Glamour magazine, has lived with her husband for over a year on 113th and Adam Clayton Powell. "There is such a sense of community here," she says.

Perry, who used to live in the Village, now rents a two-bedroom apartment. "That whole Village apartment was the size of my living room here," says Perry. "And it was more expensive. . . It's amazing up here. We really do love the neighborhood."

So why doesn't everybody live there? Though it has a lot going for it in terms of proximity to the park and convenience to subway lines, the neighborhood has, until recently, been plagued by the perception that it was unsafe.

In May, for instance, there was a high-profile sex attack in the park near 104th Street. While the woman and her dog fought off the attacker, the northern end of the park still isn't as populated as the southern end.


TRIP THROUGH TIME

The neighborhood's current resurgence, and its issues, have a long history. At the turn of the century, the street was an upper-middle-class stronghold inhabited by families that typically had one or two servants, says Michael Henry Adams, author of "Harlem Lost And Found." (You can see the real estate legacy in the buildings' chandeliered lobbies with extensive period details.)

As Harlem became an African-American enclave after about 1910, Central Park North became the street of choice for wealthy African-Americans, particularly artists and actors, Adams says.

But after the Second World War, Central Park North went the way of the rest of Harlem, beleaguered by rampant crime, poverty and neglect. The Harlem Meer, an 11-acre pond that's now as glorious as the Reservoir, was overgrown with weeds.

That began to change in the last decade. "People were beginning to see what 110th Street would become - a very expensive residential community," Adams says.

But it couldn't happen overnight. While luxury condos have sprung up nearby-the gothic-looking former New York Cancer Hospital at 455 Central Park West, between 105th and 106th streets, has been converted to multimillion-dollar apartments, as has the Washington Irving Mansion on 112th Street - most of the apartment buildings on Central Park North have been populated with long-term tenants in rent-controlled apartments.

Change has been gradual.


ONE BUILDING'S STORY

Like many of the buildings along Central Park North, 21 W. 110th is being renovated apartment by apartment, as an older and less-affluent generation of tenants moves out or dies. Mohammed Kawoya, the building's super, says renovated apartments get new everything - pipes, electric and air conditioning, as well as new appliances and hardwood floors.

Of course, the disparity between the quality of apartments - and rents - of next-door neighbors can lead to tensions between the old generation of tenants and the newer, younger set moving into the renovated apartments.

"No one wants Harlem to remain a derelict place that people are afraid to come to," Adams says. "But people feel that they lived here a long time, suffered through not having any attention from landlords, rodents in the buildings, and now that it's improving they are afraid of being priced out and pushed out."

"Our apartment was one of the first in the building to be renovated," says Kate Tomassi, who lives with her husband, Peter, in a top-floor apartment facing the park. "When we moved in three years ago, there were a lot of rent-stabilized apartments. Now there are more kids from Columbia, young couples."

When a newly renovated apartment becomes available, there are plenty of takers. Neil Tilbury, a real estate agent with

Manhattan Apartments, says the problem with Central Park North is lack of supply - not a lack of demand.

"There's not a lot that comes up on Central Park North," he says.

Still, it's not as if the street at the top of the park is likely to catch up to its cousins - the other parkside streets - in terms of price or cachet, any time soon, many agents say.

Tony Oakley, a vice president for the Corcoran Group, has said that space in the area may now go for $525 to $600 a square foot, much less than space on the south side of the park.

But that's what makes the neighborhood appealing to a new generation of middle-class tenants.

Jean Michel Boujon moved to Harlem from France five months ago. "It's a real lively neighborhood," says Boujon, who lives in a three-bedroom apartment he rents with two others for $2,300 a month. "I love to come to the park after work and go fishing. It's so convenient."

Boujon, who works for an Internet company in White Plains, says the ease of the commute from 125th Street is also a real plus. I really like the neighborhood," he says. "It's very affordable for Manhattan."

Jeff Wilcox and his wife, Lori Robertson, have lived in a 700-square-foot one-bedroom with their daughter. They've been there for three years, and Wilcox said it's much nicer than it used to be. "There are a couple of coffee shops now, and the walk along 110th Street to Broadway [where the 1,9 train stops] is much safer now," he says.

Of course, the couple also likes their rent - $1,900 a month.

Best of all, though, is playing with their daughter in the park. "We do a lot of walking," he notes.

The combination of affordability and being on the park also works for Kate and Peter Tomassi. For $2,295 a month, they have a 1,300-square-foot, three-bedroom apartment.

And they love it - both the space and the views.

"When there are fireworks in the park," says Kate Tomassi, "We can see them from our window."

-additional reporting by Janet Huege


Copyright 2004 NYP Holdings, Inc.

TonyO
November 21st, 2004, 03:46 PM
New York Magazine
Real Estate
Above It All

Central Park North always had great views—and few takers. But the secret is finally getting out.

http://www.nymetro.com/images/realestate/04/11/realestate041115_1_400.jpg

By Deborah Schoeneman


Photo: Alex Kroke/Courtesy of The Athena Group



Fifth Avenue and Central Park West are called the Gold Coasts; Central Park South is ever so slightly less prestigious but plenty expensive. But Central Park North—a.k.a. 110th Street between Fifth and Eighth avenues, which above the park is called Frederick Douglass Boulevard—has for years been the underachiever of the family. As recently as a couple of years ago, you’d turn the corner from Fifth Avenue in the low 100s and see an abrupt change from doormen and wealth to a line of raddled old buildings. Landowners who didn’t want to sell and the proximity of crime-laden Morningside Park kept buyers from making that left turn.


Such an imbalance couldn’t last in this market, of course, and Central Park North is definitely edging toward chic. “We call it Upper Manhattan,” says developer Louis Dubin of the Athena Group. Dubin recently bought the shopping center at the corner of Central Park North and Lenox Avenue, and hopes—pending a construction-hardship variance—to build seventeen stories of condos there selling for $450,000 to $2 million. (The sales office should open early next summer.) The tower will have a garage, and maybe a gym and a sculpture garden out front—where there’s also a 2/3 subway stop. “It’s for New Yorkers priced out of other neighborhoods,” says Dubin, who also developed the far ritzier sites at 838 Fifth Avenue and 43 West 64th Street. Next door, the old Parkway Hospital—abandoned in the late sixties, and then owned by Hale House—is being turned into lofts. And several blocks north, developer Joe Tahl is converting the Normandy, a prewar building where prices will probably range from $750,000 to $1.2 million for a four-bedroom, 1,800-square-foot apartment.


It’s all part of the larger Harlem rebirth—it’s just more dramatic when park views figure into the picture. Longtime Harlem broker Willie Kathryn Suggs says the condos are filling a void now that the uptown brownstone market has skyrocketed. One of her clients wants to trade his Riverside Drive apartment for a townhouse, but he’s having no luck. “He’s probably going to end up paying $1 million and getting a bigger apartment, because the houses between 110th Street and 125th Street are over $1 million and they need a gut renovation,” says Suggs, who ticked off a list of boldface neighborhood names—Marcia Gay Harden, Maya Angelou, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar—who are moving in. “The developers are bringing us back to what we had before the bad old days, when no one in his right mind wanted to live here. Back then, you couldn’t find takers for a $500 townhouse.”


Movers
Keitel Doesn’t Sell
When will Harvey Keitel settle down? The tough-guy actor recently slashed the price of his Tribeca penthouse at 55 Hudson Street—again. Last spring, Keitel put the three-apartment combination, which sprawls over 4,200 square feet and has a private 3,000-square-foot roof terrace, on the market for $7 million before he moved in. He’d planned a big renovation, but then his new wife, Daphna Kaster, became pregnant and, sources say, Keitel started looking around for a doorman building. Over the summer, he dropped the price to $6.5 million, then to $6.3 million a few weeks ago (with Corcoran broker Wilbur Gonzalez). Brokers say Keitel is still hunting in the neighborhood, and is renting a loft on North Moore Street.


Another temporary Tribeca renter, media heir Lachlan Murdoch, has settled into a double-height duplex at 79 Laight Street that’s said to rent for $12,000 a month. Murdoch and his wife, Wonderbra model Sarah O’Hare—who just had a baby boy—sold their loft at 285 Lafayette Street for $7.5 million last spring; still no details about what Rupert’s boy is up to at 11 Spring Street, the mysterious, graffiti-tagged building he bought last year for $5.25 million, though a crane went up and work began a few weeks ago.


Triple Assessment
150 Central Park South (Hampshire House)
Two-bedroom, two-bathroom, 1,200-square-foot co-op.
Asking price: $1.725 million.
Monthly maintenance: $4,327.18.
Broker: Roger Erickson, Sotheby’s International Realty.


A few months ago, this apartment had a buyer at $1.675 million rejected by the co-op board. Perhaps there were concerns about anyone who’d buy an apartment with Mylar wallpaper and gold-dragon bathroom fixtures. “It’s like raw space,” says broker Roger Erickson, putting on a brave face. Our brokers agreed that it’s hard to argue with two bedrooms on a high floor facing the park, plus a big terrace. But at that price? With that maintenance?


Barbara Fox, Fox Realty: “The layout is nice,” says Fox, who was briefly terrified by what she thought was a dead rat. (It was a dust bunny.) The large windows in the living room and dining room are offset by the dark bedroom. She suggests marketing it as a pricey pied-à-terre: “Central Park South is the best for out-of-towners.”
Her assessment: $1.5 million.


Michele Kleier, Gumley Haft Kleier: “The maintenance is high, especially since the building recently got rid of maid service,” she says. (It’s still available for a fee.) “But park views add 20 percent.” The décor certainly didn’t help: “It looks like a war zone!” she says. “It needs to be styled.”
Her assessment: $1.595 million.


A. Laurance Kaiser IV, Key-Ventures Realty: Kaiser had already shown this apartment, back when it was furnished. “This is frightening!” he says, surveying a shattered mirror wall, but quickly adds, “polishing the floors and washing the windows would make all the difference.” He’d drop the asking price to start a bidding war.
His assessment: $1.475 million.

krulltime
April 27th, 2005, 04:04 AM
Rao's opens upstairs luxury rentals


April 25, 2005

http://www.therealdeal.net//breaking_news/2005/04/25/images/1114438557.jpg
Rao's on East 114th Street


Legendary Rao's, a pasta joint at East 114th Street and Pleasant Avenue in East Harlem, has unbricked its upper floors to create 22 luxury rental units with East Village prices, two of which are already signed for - but that won't get you a reservation at the selective restaurant.


Copyright © 2003-2005 The Real Deal.


You Wanna Piece of This?
Rao’s opens its doors to residents—but they’ll have to do their own cooking.

By S.Jhoanna Robledo

http://www.newyorkmetro.com/images/realestate/05/04/realestate050425_1_400.jpg
Photo Credit: Mark Mainz/Getty Images/Newscom

Go up to Rao’s, the notoriously selective pasta joint at East 114th Street and Pleasant Avenue, and it looks much as it has for decades: bright-red façade on a dodgy-looking block, a natty Frank Pellegrino at the front of the house, maybe Robert De Niro or Billy Joel at one of the ten tables. But cast your eye upward starting this week, and you’ll see one big difference: a banner stretched across the bricks that reads LIVE ABOVE A LEGEND. Yes, this week, the upper floors of the building—until recently bricked up and all but abandoned (as in the photo below, from 2002)—will become Rao’s City Views, a 22-unit luxury rental. “People will get here because of the mystique and end up staying because of the apartments,” says Corcoran’s Neal Sroka, the listings broker, who rarely handles rentals but made an exception for the restaurant he loves. With prices that are more East Village than East Harlem ($2,000 a month for a one-bedroom to $5,400 for a two-bedroom penthouse with a terrace), will anyone bite?

Apparently, two people already have. A telecommunications entrepreneur who’ll pay about $3,000 a month for her corner two-bedroom admits that she could be living in a building farther south for the same money, explaining that the restaurant is “part of the appeal.” The few blocks surrounding Rao’s were long an oddity in East Harlem, staying relatively stable through the high-crime seventies and eighties. Now they’re at the forefront of the gentrification boom sweeping north from 96th Street, and, in fact, the apartments over Rao’s are priced about the same as most new developments in the area. A two-bedroom nearby on 117th Street is leasing for $2,600 a month; a one-bedroom on 118th is $2,000. “The market’s hot—in twenty days, we’ve rented 26 apartments,” says Justin Brunwasser, manager of Vertical City Realty, which specializes in East Harlem. (The sales market is even hotter; the average price for a one-bedroom in 2004 was $230,855, up 8.6 percent from 2003, according to Jonathan Miller of the appraisal firm Miller Samuel.) In fact, says Ron Straci—who co-owns the building with his family and the restaurant with Pellegrino—this plan to renovate has been in the works for several years.

Which brings us to the crucial question: Will signing a lease get you a reservation? “The answer is no,” replies Straci. “It’s easier to get an apartment than a table.” Tenants will have to comfort—or torture—themselves with the pervasive hallway aroma of garlic and tomatoes.


Copyright © 2004 , New York Metro.

krulltime
April 27th, 2005, 04:06 AM
Ok interesting news... especially the price and the interest from some to pay that much in East Harlem.

But are there really going to be 22 units in that building? Rather small ones I might say.

Anyone here has been to Rao?

Schadenfrau
April 27th, 2005, 12:14 PM
I've had a drink at the bar, but the legendary wait for a reservation is no joke.

Gulcrapek
April 27th, 2005, 08:30 PM
krull: they're adding floors too.

http://www.corcoran.com/property/nd/photo/rao.jpg

http://www.corcoran.com/property/nd/index.asp?CGM=Y

pianoman11686
July 23rd, 2005, 01:31 AM
Once Derelict, Now Desirable

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2005/07/24/realestate/24cov.583.jpg
Buildings like this one, at 1809 Seventh Avenue, at 111th Street, have been kept afloat by people with modest incomes.

By PATRICK O'GILFOIL HEALY

Published: July 24, 2005

GRACE ADAMS and her family have seen the worst days of 870 Riverside Drive.

They moved in after the landlord absconded in the mid-1970's, leaving the city to foreclose on the building for unpaid taxes. They endured corrupt managers and broken pipes. They stuck around when rape suspects were arrested nearby, and when the police shot a gun-wielding man a few doors down.

Ms. Adams was there in 1983, when the tenants organized themselves, began managing the building and, with help from the city, converted it from derelict property into a co-op for low-income homeowners. They paid $250 per apartment and managed it modestly.

Now 73 years old, Ms. Adams is witnessing 870 Riverside's latest protean twist. To her astonishment, the modest co-op building, near the corner of 160th Street, has become a hot property.

The city's churning real estate market has surged into 870 Riverside and hundreds of other low-income co-ops called Housing Development Fund Corporation buildings. Scattered through Harlem, Washington Heights, Brooklyn and the Bronx, they were abandoned by landlords, seized by the city, then renovated and converted into co-ops for low-income tenants.

For years, the apartments sold for less than $7,500, always to people who made modest incomes, and they were largely overlooked by real estate brokers. But now that these neighborhoods are in big demand, the apartments are drawing buyers who can slide in under the co-op income caps but who have significant assets because they are middle-class retirees, or young people getting help from their families. Because of the demand for these apartments, firms like Halstead Property and the Corcoran Group are listing them for $250,000, $400,000 or as much as $950,000.

From one perspective, every boat is lifted. Buyers can snap up spacious apartments for below-market prices. Sellers who endured hard years in the buildings can get their reward - cash out to retire or send their children to college. Through flip taxes, or fees paid when an apartment is sold, the buildings get a slice of the rising sales prices to pay for paint jobs, roof repairs or new boilers.

But housing advocates and some longtime residents recoil at those arguments. They say that Housing Development Fund buildings are supposed to be immune from the fluctuations of the real estate market, with its bidding wars, bubble talk and $800,000 asking prices.

Because co-op sales are not public records, there are no statistics that describe how prices have changed over the years. But brokers who sell these apartments and housing advocates familiar with the neighborhoods agree that prices have ballooned in the last few years.

Even at their current prices, Housing Development Fund Corporation apartments, usually called H.D.F.C.'s, are some of the last bargains in New York City.

Ron Ferdinand, a broker for Halstead, received 2,191 phone messages after listing a H.D.F.C. apartment for $100,000 last May. The calls came from as far away as Germany and Italy, Mr. Ferdinand said.

At 870 Riverside, an 1,800-square-foot four-bedroom apartment with French doors and sunny views is on the market for $599,000. "Best deal in Manhattan," declares the broker, Prudential Douglas Elliman, in its online listing. A two-bedroom in the building, also listed by Elliman, is priced at $650,000.

The monthly maintenance is about 40 cents a square foot, or $712 for the four-bedroom and $576 for the two-bedroom.

But with bargains come hassles. In nearly every housing corporation building, catches and caveats are buried in the bylaws, and no two buildings share the same rules and restrictions.

Some have high flip taxes, with the sellers having to remit a portion of their profits to the co-op board. Some flip taxes are constant; others diminish the longer a resident has lived in the building. Some buildings even prohibit reselling an apartment for two to five years.

Many of the buildings carry income restrictions. Some are set against the city's median income, at 80 percent, 120 percent or 150 percent of median. Others are calculated by a formula multiplying maintenance costs by resale costs and other factors.

The limitations weed out many prospective owners. At 870 Riverside, a single buyer must earn less than $52,725 to meet the limits. A two-person family - either a couple or a parent and child - can earn up to $60,300. The limit for a family of four is $75,375.

It is difficult, however, for people who earn those salaries to afford the apartments. An annual salary of $50,000 is more than twice the average individual's yearly income in New York, but not nearly enough to get a mortgage on a $600,000 apartment, brokers say.

"The bank is not going to loan much," said Susan Skinner, one of two Elliman brokers selling the four-bedroom at 870 Riverside. "What these apartments are designed for are people who have a moderate income but a lot of cash on hand. It's very difficult to find a buyer."

So which buyers can meet the demands of a bank and the limits of a building? Recent retirees. People who have just sold a home. Anyone who's inherited money recently. Students with wealthy parents. Self-employed buyers whose income varies year to year. "If someone has a trust fund, and they don't have a big income, that's great," said Holly Price, an agent selling a housing corporation co-op in Ditmas Park, Brooklyn, for $325,000. "That would be perfect because it's so easy."

The income caps apply only to new buyers, meaning that owners can remain in their apartment if their incomes rise past the restrictions.

Soaring prices and trust-fund buyers were unthinkable prospects 30 years ago, when the city and state set up the regulations and funds that would help convert 1,200 seized and foreclosed buildings into housing corporation co-ops. The conversions allowed the city to jettison hundreds of seized and foreclosed buildings while offering low-cost homes to low- and moderate-income tenants.

Many had decayed for decades and were infested with insects or drug dealers. Elevators didn't work. The boilers broke, the halls needed painting and the apartments needed new interiors. In one building, a tenant froze to death one winter night after his radiator broke.

Different buildings were converted under different sets of rules and timetables, but the basic formula was this: tenants of a city-owned building attended management classes and bought their property for a pittance. The city or state contributed tax credits and money for renovation.

"The vision was, we got to build housing for people in the neighborhood who have fought to stay and who deserve an opportunity for ownership," said Bill Perkins, a City Council member who represents parts of Harlem and has worked with housing corporation buildings for years.

And then, stasis. Years passed in buildings without any apartments turning over. The owners clung to their co-ops. Few outside brokers or buyers showed an interest. Even when a tenant died or stopped paying maintenance, the boards were loath to foreclose and sell vacant apartments, housing advocates said.

In the past few years, however, as Harlem became saturated with bargain hunters, boards discovered the value of their buildings. Apartments became available as aging owners died or retired, and the broader Manhattan real estate market discovered housing corporation buildings. Values started to soar.

"It's not a secret anymore," said Ann Henderson, associate director of the Urban Homesteading Assistance Board, a nonprofit advocate for affordable housing. "We're trying to hold onto the scarce little affordable housing resources we have left, while the vultures are descending. We're fighting a losing battle."

Of course, not all of the 25,000 housing corporation units in the city are being flipped, and many are selling for $150,000 or $250,000.

"You can't find that price anyplace" for a regular co-op, said Anthony Stancil, who is buying a housing development co-op on 156th Street.

For $200,000, Catherine Ventura, a freelance writer, and her husband, a freelance television journalist, bought a studio and a one-bedroom apartment on the top floor of a housing corporation building on Manhattan Avenue at 123rd Street. The couple, who have a 6-year-old son, own an apartment in Hudson Heights but had wanted to move farther south, and Ms. Ventura said she pounced when she saw an online listing.

The building had stained glass, tin ceilings, marble hallways and income restrictions of about $70,000. Ms. Ventura's family met them, so they signed contracts and were approved by the board. They bought the co-ops in cash, and must live there for five years before they sell. When they do, they'll pay a 30 percent flip tax on the profits.

The family plans to move in on Aug. 1. "It's a middle-class building," Ms. Ventura said. "It wasn't a question of coming in with a lot of leverage and forcing people out. The apartments were on the market. We qualified."

Homeowners like Erenita Chiuza, who recently bought a housing development apartment in Harlem, said they were drawn to the working-class character of the buildings. "They were people like me, humble people and very nice," Ms. Chiuza said.

In other buildings, longtime owners are greeting their new neighbors with a mix of enthusiasm and unease. For Dawn Ziegler, president of a housing corporation co-op at Seventh Avenue and Central Park North, an apartment on the market there for $795,000 means that the owners are getting their due.

"It's a reward," she said, "for the tenants who had the tenacity to go through the program, to put up with all the different personalities you have to go through in a poor community. Just having to go through that, and go through all the requirements H.D.F.C. put you through."

But others worry about how the new buyers will change the buildings. Grace Adams's son, William, also owns an apartment at 870 Riverside Drive, and he is worried about the ramifications. Mr. Adams, 52, said the newer residents care more about property values than affordability and low maintenance. They have proposed amending the building's bylaws to eliminate income caps for buyers and have succeeded in reducing the flip tax to 10 percent of the profits of a sale from 40 percent, he said.

Mr. Adams, who has no plans to sell, said he gets upset when longtime residents decide to sell for as much as possible. He said he asks his neighbors whether they could afford a home at their asking price.

"It was intended to be affordable housing," Mr. Adams said. "I was given an opportunity that should be passed on to others. What I'm seeing is - greed is not a good word. Capitalism? I just wonder."

On 156th Street, John Culpepper worries about the type of people paying $150,000 for apartments in a building where he bought his place for $250 in 1983. Mr. Culpepper, 74, was once a shipboard engineer, and became the keeper of the boiler in his building after the landlord abandoned the building.

Mr. Culpepper said he and other longtime tenants live frugally and try to keep the maintenance as low as possible. The 36-unit building is even firing its managing agent to save $1,300 a month in fees, he said. Each apartment will save about $36 per month.

"We have to be careful about who we accept," Mr. Culpepper said. "If too many rich people come in here, they can change the agenda, and the little people have to play keep-up. We have to make sure the people we accept in here don't overrule the people who paid $250."

Most of these buildings have no limits on resale prices, requiring only that the income restrictions are met, said Jordi Reyes-Montblanc, president of the Housing Development Fund Corporations Council.

Mr. Montblanc said a lack of oversight structures allows buildings to ignore the income caps, a violation that would revoke their tax credits. Housing corporation buildings are allowed to lift their income restrictions 10 to 15 years after their co-op conversion, but few have chosen to do so.

The Urban Homesteading Assistance Board monitors sales in about 60 buildings, but most others do not have to report buyer incomes or sales prices to the city's Department of Housing Preservation and Development, which governs many low-income co-ops.

"The rules that are out there for these buildings are very unclear," said Andrew Reicher, executive director of the homesteading board. "It leaves it open to abuse."

Two years ago, the Department of Housing Preservation and Development sought to tighten resales of new housing corporation apartments. Buildings entering the city's Tenant Interim Lease program - a precursor to becoming a housing corporation co-op - must now adopt a 30 percent flip tax and set its income limits at 120 percent of median. New co-ops must agree to abide by these terms for 30 years.

Mr. Reicher said that there are about 300 buildings wending their way through the process of co-op conversion. Those buildings would fall under these new limits.

Board members at housing corporation co-ops say that they still have many of the original tenants, but more and more people decide to cash out and retire to Florida or Georgia or move in with family.

But Ms. Adams, at 870 Riverside, said she won't be one of them.

"I have no desire to sell my apartment," she said. "I was born in New York, and I live in New York."

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company

krulltime
September 24th, 2005, 12:40 AM
Reborn Harlem awaits amenities
Many residents leave neighborhood to shop; major chains reluctant to move in


By Lisa Fickenscher
Published on September 19, 2005


Peter Dipietro is like many new transplants to Harlem.

He loves his renovated townhouse at West 150th Street and Broadway and the friendliness of the neighbors he's gotten to know in the two and a half years he's lived there. The Quinnipiac University professor also embraces the cultural diversity in his largely Hispanic neighborhood.

But when he wants to go out to eat or to do his food shopping, Mr. DiPietro is reminded of what he left behind when he moved from the Upper East Side of Manhattan. "We lack variety in restaurants," he says of his new home, adding that he drives more than a mile to Fairway at West 132nd Street to do his weekly grocery shopping.

Longtime residents of Harlem have always complained about the lack of essential amenities where they live. Those who can afford to do so shop elsewhere, as evidenced by data from the 2000 census. An analysis conducted by Columbia University for Community Board 11 shows that residents of East Harlem spend only 19% of their disposable income in their community.


Same old story


Even with the great economic surge in Harlem, the situation has not changed much. New residents are finding that large swaths of Harlem still lack basic conveniences such as quality dry cleaners, supermarkets that offer fresh produce and meat, and a critical mass of full-service restaurants and national retailers.

To be sure, a number of new restaurants and other retailers are coming into the neighborhood, but they are primarily clustered on the west side of Harlem or on 125th Street, where there are few residential buildings. The housing developments mostly on or near 116th, 135th and 145th streets need to be complemented with new stores and services, says Lloyd Williams, chief executive of the Greater Harlem Chamber of Commerce.

"People should be able to shop in their immediate neighborhoods instead of walking half a mile or more to 125th Street," he adds.

Part of the problem, say local officials, is that major chains with headquarters outside of New York cling to misperceptions about Harlem. They believe crime is high, when in fact it dropped 65% from 1993 to 2004. Moreover, the number of crimes committed on the Upper East Side last year is actually a third greater than in East Harlem. The incidence of crime in West Harlem is also lower than that on the affluent Upper East Side, according to local police precinct data.

Still, coveted retail chains such as The Gap and Barnes & Noble have yet to open stores in upper Manhattan. A broker familiar with the situation says that Whole Foods repeatedly has been shown space in East Harlem but has passed.

"They say the numbers aren't there yet," says Robert Rodriguez, vice chair of Community Board 11, which represents East Harlem.

Until retailers wake up to Harlem's potential, longtime and newer residents have adopted strategies to get around the dearth of quality retail. Robin Verges, a public relations executive who grew up in Harlem, takes the bus to shop at Fairway and other supermarkets that are better than the one by her apartment on West 113th Street and Manhattan Avenue. Also, she lugs her dry cleaning to a place near her office in midtown, because the one close to her home offers inferior service. Newsstands are another sorely missed staple, she says.

Taa Grays, an attorney who bought a co-op on West 145th Street and Frederick Douglass Boulevard this summer, says she misses FreshDirect's service since she moved 20 blocks north.

The online grocer delivers in Harlem--and is often touted by real estate brokers--but it does not come to Ms. Grays' block. "I guess the neighborhood is considered too low-income, even though it's being gentrified," she says.


Lonely tea room


Patrice Clayton, who opened the Harlem Tea Room nine months ago on Madison Avenue and East 118th Street, would like to see more restaurants in the neighborhood, where she lives. "I feel like I'm all by myself here," she says of her new business. Directly across the street and above her eatery are hundreds of new luxury condos, but only a handful of places to shop.

The inequity between residential and retail development exists across Harlem. Mr. Williams of the local chamber of commerce blames poor planning by developers, who are more interested in making a quick buck on the hot residential market than carving out space for the services people require.

For their part, a few developers are beginning to take action. The Olnick Organization, for one, is working on a plan to upgrade the retail spaces at Lenox Terrace, a 1,700-unit, 50-year-old apartment building between West 132nd and West 135th streets.

"We are often shocked to find that our residents are shopping downtown or getting into their cars and going to Westchester," says Neil Rubler, executive vice president of Olnick, which manages and oversees leasing at Lenox Terrace. "These are people who have been here for 30 years."


STUDYING HABITS


The 125th Street Business Improvement District is initiating a retail study to better understand the shopping patterns and needs of Harlem residents, with a focus on the higher-income professionals who have been increasingly moving into the neighborhood.
"We don't have a clear picture of the emerging housing market and the residents' needs," says Barbara Askins, chief executive of the BID.

The BID received a grant for the survey from the U.S. Department of Commerce and hopes to complete the study by December.



©2005 Crain Communications Inc

BxOne
September 25th, 2005, 04:02 AM
Central Park North?

Please tell me thats a joke. I remember when you could buy crack on every corner of Harlem. Wait a minute, you still can buy crack on every corner of Harlem.

I'm glad to see the area is on the way up. However, I hate to see the locals, who stuck out the worst of it, get pushed out of their buildings. It's not worth it. A lot of good families stuck it out in the neighborhoods of Harlem, East Harlem and Washington Heights. They improved the community themselves. From community gardens on vacant lots to fighting slumlords. It's wrong for someone to pull the rug out from under their feet. Gentrification under the Bloomberg administration is killing the working class.

Once Harlem was known for one thing, crack. I'm happy it's a livable place now. Still many problems with crime, drugs, poverty, and other related issues. But hey, it's improving. Good for the residents who did what they could. They can proudly say, we did this, we took back our community.