PDA

View Full Version : Antarctic Ice Station



krulltime
June 29th, 2004, 11:25 AM
Antarctic ice station likely to float away


June 28, 2004

LONDON, England (Reuters) -- Britain's Antarctic ice station has a design problem few architects can have envisaged when it was built -- within a decade it is likely to float away.

The existing base is built on an ice shelf which is likely to break off into the sea if global warming continues at its current rate.

So now the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) has appealed for designers to come up with a replacement.

Not only will the new $35 million (£19 million) station have to be able to operate throughout the year in one of the world's most inhospitable environments, it will have to be environmentally neutral and aesthetically inspiring.

So strict are the environmental rules governing Antarctica that all refuse -- including human waste -- is supposed to be bagged up and shipped out so no lasting trace is left of outside occupation.

"This is an ambitious project," said BAS director Chris Rapley. "It will be a fusion of science, architecture, technology and engineering."

The new station will replace BAS' existing Halley facility on the Brunt ice shelf which is expected to follow much of the ice-bound continent's sea ice and break away as the world's climate warms.

The existing Halley station is the fifth to be built on the Brunt shelf since 1956 to study changing weather patterns.

Unlike its predecessors which have simply been swallowed by the ice, the current Halley is on stilts and is jacked up each year to avoid being submerged by snow.

A BAS spokeswoman said the new station, scheduled to be operational by November 2008 in time for the 2008/2009 southern hemisphere summer when the staff quadruples to 60, would probably be built on the remains of the Brunt shelf.

But it will be sited on the landward side of the expected crack in the shelf, rather than on solid ground.

"It is a relatively simple matter to resupply a station by sea if it is on the ice shelf. Siting it inland on solid ground would mean resupply by air which is astronomically expensive," the spokeswoman said.

The new station will not only have to cope with temperatures of -30 degrees Celsius (-22 Fahrenheit) and howling gales, but will also have to be able literally to rise above the regular snowfalls.

A shortlist of design teams expressing an interest by August 3 will be asked to submit concept proposals to the Royal Institute of British Architects, and a winner will be named in September 2005.


Copyright 2004 Reuters.

krulltime
June 29th, 2004, 11:28 AM
More info:

http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/News_and_Information/Stories/2004/design_competition/index.html

krulltime
June 29th, 2004, 11:31 AM
Halley:

http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/Living_and_Working/Stations/Halley/halley.jpg

© Copyright Natural Environment Research Council British Antarctic Survey 2004.

Ninjahedge
June 29th, 2004, 01:27 PM
So the current station is "environmentally neutral and aesthetically inspiring"?

;)

Oh, and since when did ARCHITECTS design that station, or any other like it?

Geez, engineers get no credit and all the blame if something falls down....

Anyway, I think a domed structure might work well, but they might still be forced to put it up on stilts to account for the gradual settlement through the ice.....


Aside from that, what other "environment" does it need to blend with? Are a bunch of penguins learning from the NYC NIMBYs? ;)

krulltime
June 29th, 2004, 02:37 PM
Well after the new station is built and something bad happens to it.

Who is to blame again?

The Engineers. :roll:

Ninjahedge
June 29th, 2004, 04:14 PM
Well, it's their fault that they can't defy the laws of physics!!!

I mean, GOD, how is an architect supposed to work with these guys!!!!


(Strange how architecture is considered an "art" but yet so few of these "artists" are ever taught how to work with their material.......)