Page 64 of 151 FirstFirst ... 145460616263646566676874114 ... LastLast
Results 946 to 960 of 2257

Thread: 50 East 57th Street @ 432 Park Avenue (former Drake Hotel site)

  1. #946

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Music Man View Post
    Oh, I see. I just now noticed how close the Citicorp building is in that rendering which would make the "pole version" about a block or two east of 50. Oops.
    Pardon the "poll." This is certainly not a Gallop Poll. Thanks for clarifying that someone simply decided to draw it.

  2. #947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by babybackribs2314 View Post
    I've read that they should be brushed-nickel, but I could be wrong. Definitely not concrete/stone, though.
    Thanks. Do you know or are you guessing? Nickel would look nice.

  3. #948
    Senior Member DUMBRo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Out Yonder...
    Posts
    180

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by londonlawyer View Post
    Thanks. Do you know or are you guessing? Nickel would look nice.
    So long as the glare doesn't invite lawsuits from neighbors. It will have to be toned down and subtle...which may even be better.

  4. #949

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by londonlawyer View Post
    Thanks. Do you know or are you guessing? Nickel would look nice.
    Someone had mentioned it on another forum, I believe RW who had some insider knowledge on the project? Not sure, though.

  5. #950

    Default

    Thanks. I believe some of the architects involved in the project are WNY me members. Maybe they know. A sleek facade would be nice.

  6. #951

    Default

    "intrepid Wired New York listservers. Take a look a this slideshow, slide 1 of 9 puts the scale of this project in context better than most I have seen. There is a lot to see here in town lately for the "intrepid" architecture scout; with the groundbreaking of this building, the ongoing construction of WTC Tower One, and several other 'major' skyscrapers under construction there is a lot great projects to follow.
    http://archinect.com/navigate/181014...rk-avenue%252F

  7. #952

  8. #953

    Default

    http://observer.com/2012/06/432-park/

    Well, so this is it then. Can't say that I am wildly enthausistic about the design of this. It's tall and..... thats about it. Its a shame that the Drake hotel had to make way for this thing.


  9. #954
    Build the Tower Verre antinimby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in Limbo
    Posts
    8,976

    Default

    ^ Yes, it is doubly painful. First, we lose the wonderful Drake and then get a missed opportunity with this uninspiring 1960's throwback.


    Not that I care but here's another one from that Observer link:


  10. #955
    Forum Veteran Tectonic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,673

    Default

    Don't know if it's the design but I don't like it's place on the skyline. Just seems odd.

  11. #956

    Default

    I kinda like it. Maybe if they would close the gaps with something darker, it would make the tower seem more unified. The tower adds an interesting diversity within the other towers around it.

    However, with that height, something original could have been done to have it stand out more.
    That my two cents for what it's worth.

  12. #957
    Crabby airline hostess - stache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Nairobi Hilton
    Posts
    8,511

    Default

    At least a peaked roof or SOMETHING...

  13. #958

    Default

    While I agree that it is a very simple design, lets all remember that this is an extremely narrow building. Any type of torque or set-back would result in penthouses the sizes of walk in closets. You just cant have it both ways.

  14. #959
    Fearless Photog RoldanTTLB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Broomfield, CO
    Posts
    2,910

    Default

    I think the building is deceptively wide in these renders. The plans show it as being within 5 ft as wide as the Sony Building, but it is theoretically a block further away from the angle of the render. I still believe this is going to be a stunning, impossibly thin building. I mean, imagine one quarter of 1WTC (but you know, same height). It's less than that.

  15. #960

    Default

    1/4 the total floor space but it will appear about half from most angles, which is still pretty thin.

    I'm just hoping this building has a great facade, that would be the only thing, besides the height to make it decent.

Similar Threads

  1. W New York - Times Square Hotel
    By hyperfine in forum New York City Guide For Visitors
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: January 18th, 2005, 08:55 PM
  2. Station Renovation - East New York
    By Gulcrapek in forum New York City Guide For New Yorkers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: July 30th, 2004, 09:59 AM
  3. Future of Flushing Airport Site
    By Kris in forum New York City Guide For New Yorkers
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 13th, 2004, 08:15 PM
  4. East River - large file
    By ZippyTheChimp in forum Photos and Videos of New York
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: March 31st, 2003, 04:50 AM
  5. Pictures of luxurious W Hotel - Times Square
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For Visitors
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 29th, 2001, 12:36 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software