This isn't comparing apples to apples. One is a masterpiece the other a monstrosity.Originally Posted by NYTIMES
No surprise that Moinian has bad taste. Nearly all his buildings look like mierda.
Bet this building gets torn down in 25 yrs anyway. We can thank the developers of today for giving us plenty to raze and redevelop in the future.
This isn't comparing apples to apples. One is a masterpiece the other a monstrosity.Originally Posted by NYTIMES
I never heard that before -- that there was a competition for a new design. Had anyone else heard this? If so, are there any renders that were released ... or is there anyone with access to any renders?
Ross isn't exactly the Medici, but he's head and shoulders above Moinian, and this site, for now, is one of the what-ifs (if not one of the "great" what-ifs) of New York's architectural history. (For that matter, another what-if is "What if they'd just left the old GM/Newsweek Building sans mutilation?")
oh the horror....
Does anyone know if the current building is up to zoning max on it's FAR? If there's no unused air rights, we might be linving with it for a long time.
Thats actually the most flattering picture I have seen of this building. Too bad it look 100X worse in person.
It seems that what's here now may be overbuilt* beyond the allowable FAR.
The irregular lot (~ 121' x 216' x 201' x 200') measures ~ 32,200 sf. An article from the NY Post (December 2007) states that the existing building has 625,000 gsf. I searched for other references to the full size of this building, including various filings at DOB, but found nothing -- so I'll move ahead based on the Post info (sometimes a bad start for an argument, but what else can one do?) ...
Zoning for the site is C5-3 (High Density Commercial) which has a Commercial FAR of 15.0 (based on the Zoning Date Table 6 [pdf] from City Planning).
Allowable: 32,000 sf x 15.0 FAR = 483,000 square feet.
625,000 sf (existing) - 483,000 sf = 142,000 sf overbuilt
Additional FAR could be available via plazas (none on this lot currently) and various public amenities (the subway entrances / station beneath could qualify).
*Me is not a lawyer or a zoning professional, so take with the proper grain of salt.
^
Thanks,
The point being that if there no addition floor space to be garnered by a demo/rebuild, why would anyone do it?
Not sure how the financials would work, but look at the prices commanded by a somewhat comparable residential developments overlooking the Park, like 15 Central Park West or Time Warner. And consider the future of commercial rents in this area.
looks like Gary Kaufman on drugs...
It's bad, but not that bad. Glad the scaffolding is down.
![]()
Bookmarks