Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst ... 34567891011 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 187

Thread: 9.0 Earthquake Strikes Japan

  1. #91
    Disgruntled Optimist lofter1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    NYC - Downtown


    Isn't the ocean constantly changing it's boundaries? This is just a far more extreme example. This planet is not static; it's growing, bulging, sinking & shifting all the time.

  2. #92


    (look who's talking)

  3. #93
    Forum Veteran Daquan13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    East Boston, MA.


    A dog was found alive on top of the roof of a floating house that was carried away with other debris in the water.

    According to sources, he had been there for at least 2 weeks or more! Japanese Officials are puzzled as to how he was able to survive and stay alive for that long a period of time. A chopper flying over the debris spotted and rescued him.

    This part of the rescue is very powerfully familiar with and quite similar to the '04 tsunami that occured in Indonisha, where, several days later, a baby was also found still alive lying on top of some of the floating debris out on the water. He was nicknamed Baby 81 because he was the 81st person to be admitted to the hospital for observation. He was also nicknamed Tsunami Baby and Miracle Baby.

    His real name is Abilass Jeyarajah.

    He touched a lot of peoples' hearts & lives and has gained world-wide attention and notoriety, especially after he and his parents came to America and had appeared on Good Morning, America.

    After an extensive and exhaustive DNA search for his real parents, he was happily reunited with them. Today, he is a very bright cheerful smiling and happy very energetic 6-year-old who doesn't remember the danger that he was involved in at that time.

    He says that he wants to be a doctor when he grows up. Here are some pics of him below;
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Abilass Jeyarajah (Baby 81)..jpg 
Views:	82 
Size:	18.0 KB 
ID:	12660   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Baby%2081_.jpg 
Views:	86 
Size:	10.5 KB 
ID:	12661   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AJ Playing Ball..jpg 
Views:	87 
Size:	34.3 KB 
ID:	12662   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AJ4.jpg 
Views:	86 
Size:	72.2 KB 
ID:	12663   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	AJ1.jpg 
Views:	80 
Size:	88.5 KB 
ID:	12725  

    Last edited by Daquan13; August 20th, 2011 at 10:10 AM.

  4. #94


    'No safe levels' of radiation in Japan
    Experts warn that any detectable level of radiation is 'too much'.

    Dahr Jamail Last Modified: 04 Apr 2011 15:46

    According to the US Department of Energy, no level of radiation is so low that it is without health risks [EPA] In a nuclear crisis that is becoming increasingly serious, Japan’s Nuclear Safety Agency confirmed that radioactive iodine-131 in seawater samples taken near the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power complex that was seriously damaged by the recent tsunami off the coast of Japan is 4,385 times the level permitted by law.

    Airborne radiation near the plant has been measured at 4-times government limits.

    Tokyo Electric Power Company, the company that operates the crippled plant, has begun releasing more than 11,000 tons of radioactive water that was used to cool the fuel rods into the ocean while it attempts to find the source of radioactive leaks. The water being released is about 100 times more radioactive than legal limits.

    Meanwhile, water that is vastly more radioactive continues to gush into the ocean through a large crack in a six-foot deep pit at the nuclear plant. Over the weekend, workers at the plant used sawdust, shredded newspaper and diaper chemicals in a desperate attempt to plug the area, which failed. Water leaking from the pit is about 10,000 times more radioactive than water normally found at a nuclear plant

    Thus, radiation from a meltdown in the reactor core of reactor No. 2 is leaking out into the water and soil, with other reactors continuing to experience problems.

    Groundwater near the nuclear plant contains radioactive iodine 10,000 times the legal threshold.

    Yet scientists and activists question these government and nuclear industry “safe” limits of radiation exposure.

    “The U.S. Department of Energy has testified that there is no level of radiation that is so low that it is without health risks,” Jacqueline Cabasso, the Executive Director of the Western States Legal Foundation, told Al Jazeera.

    Her foundation monitors and analyzes U.S. nuclear weapons programs and policies and related high technology energy, with a focus on the national nuclear weapons laboratories.

    Cabasso explained that natural background radiation exists, “But more than 2,000 nuclear tests have enhanced this background radiation level, so we are already living in an artificially radiated environment due to all the nuclear tests.”

    “Karl Morgan, who worked on the Manhattan project, later came out against the nuclear industry when he understood the danger of low levels of ionizing radiation-and he said there is no safe dose of radiation exposure,” Cabasso continued, “That means all this talk about what a worker or the public can withstand on a yearly basis is bogus. There is no safe level of radiation exposure. These so-called safe levels are coming from within the nuclear establishment.”

    Risk at Low Doses

    Karl Morgan was an American physicist who was a founder of the field of radiation health physics. After a long career in the Manhattan Project and at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, he became a critic of nuclear power and weapons. Morgan, who died in 1999, began to offer court testimony for people who said they had been harmed by the nuclear power industry.

    “Nobody is talking about the fact that there is no safe dose of radiation,” Cabasso added, “One of the reasons Morgan said this is because doses are cumulative in the body.”

    The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) published a report in 2006 titled Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) report, VII Phase 2. NAS BEIR VII was an expert panel who reviewed available peer reviewed literature and wrote, “the committee concludes that the preponderance of information indicates that there will be some risk, even at low doses.”

    The concluding statement of the report reads, “The committee concludes that the current scientific evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that there is a linear, no-threshold dose-response relationship between exposure to ionizing radiation and the development of cancer in humans.”

    This means that the sum of several very small exposures to radiation has the same effect as one large exposure, since the effects of radiation are cumulative.

    For weeks engineers from Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco) have been working to restore power to the plant and have resorted to having seawater sprayed on radioactive fuel rods that have been at risk of meltdown.

    Despite this, Japanese officials conceded to the public on March 31 that the battle to save four crippled nuclear reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant has been lost. On March 29 a US engineer who helped install the reactors at the plant said he believed the radioactive core in unit No. 2 may have melted through the bottom of its containment vessel and on to a concrete floor.

    Tepco’s chairman, Tsunehisa Katsumata, said they had “no choice” but to scrap the No’s 1-4 reactors, but held out hope that the remaining two could continue to operate, despite the fact that he admitted the nuclear disaster could last several months. It is the first time the company has admitted that at least part of the plant will have to be decommissioned.

    But the government’s chief spokesman, Yukio Edano, repeated an earlier call for all six reactors at the 40-year-old plant to be decommissioned. “It is very clear looking at the social circumstances,” he said.

    Even after a cold shutdown, scrapping the plant will likely take decades, and the site will become a no-man’s land.

    Tonnes of nuclear waste sit at the site of the nuclear reactors, and enclosing the reactors by injecting lead and encasing them in concrete would make it safe to work and live a few kilometers away from the site, but is not a long-term solution for the disposal of spent fuel, which will decay and emit fission fragments over tens of thousands of years.

    Near the plant, the radiation levels dangerously escalated to 400 milliseiverts/hour. Considering background radiation is on the order of 1 milliseivert per year, this means a yearly background dose every 9 seconds, based on industry and governmental “allowable” radiation exposure limits.

    That compares with a national “safety standard” in the U.S. of 250 millisieverts over a year. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says a single dose of 1,000 millisieverts is enough to cause internal hemorrhaging.

    Meanwhile, more than 168 citizens organizations in Japan submitted a petition to their government on March 28 calling for an expanded evacuation zone near the Fukushima nuclear disaster site. The groups are also calling for other urgent measures to protect the public health and safety.

    Residents of evacuated areas near the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant have been warned that they may not be able to return to their homes for months as Japan’s nuclear crisis stretched into a third week.

    The neighbourhoods near the plant will remain empty “for the long term”, Yukio Edano, the country’s chief cabinet secretary, said on April 1.

    Though he did not set a timetable, he said residents would not be able to return permanently “in a matter of days or weeks. It will be longer than that”.

    The official evacuation zone remains only 20 kilometers, while the government has encouraged people within 30 kilometers to evacuate.

    Yet levels of cesium-137 in the village of Iitate, for example, have been measured at more than twice the levels that prompted the Soviet Union to evacuate people near Chernobyl. Iitate is 40 kilometers northwest of Fukushima.

    Radioactive Iodine has already been found in the tap water in all of Tokyo’s 23 wards.

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission had already recommended an 80-kilometer evacuation zone for U.S. citizens in Japan.

  5. #95


    ^ There's science & facts behind the above article, but it is written in an unscientific manner, so it tends to distort reality.

    According to the US Department of Energy, no level of radiation is so low that it is without health risks
    There aren't too many things about which we can say are "without health risks."

    Cabasso explained that natural background radiation exists, “But more than 2,000 nuclear tests have enhanced this background radiation level, so we are already living in an artificially radiated environment due to all the nuclear tests.”
    Worthless, unless you're a lawyer.

    The population of Denver gets twice the dosage of cosmic radiation than those at sea level. That's every day of their lives. No one has been able to correlate this to any long term health effect.

  6. #96


    Japan dumps thousands of tons of radioactive water into sea

    By the CNN Wire Staff
    April 4, 2011 9:47 a.m. EDT

    A Tokyo Electric Power Company picture from April 2 shows water gushing from the cracked concrete shaftTokyo (CNN) -- Japan began dumping thousands of tons of radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean on Monday, an emergency move officials said was needed to curtail a worse leak from the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
    In all, about 11,500 tons of radioactive water that has collected at the nuclear facility will be dumped into the sea, officials said Monday, as workers also try to deal with a crack that has been a conduit for contamination.
    The radiation levels were highest in the water that was being drained from reactor No. 6, the officials said.
    These are the latest but hardly the only challenges facing workers at the embattled power plant and its six reactors, which have been in constant crisis since last month's ruinous earthquake and tsunami.
    Officials with Tokyo Electric Power Company, which runs the plant, proposed the release of excess water that has pooled in and around the Nos. 5 and 6 reactors into the sea. But most of the dumped water -- 10,000 tons -- will come from the plant's central waste treatment facility, which will then be used to store highly radioactive water from the No. 2 unit, an official with the power company said.
    The water in reactors Nos. 5 and 6 is coming from a subdrain and wasn't inside the building itself, officials said. Tests suggest that groundwater is the source of the contamination in these two units, but they are not certain.
    Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano called the dumping "unavoidable." The liquid was most likely contaminated in the process of trying to cool nuclear fuel rods.

    The scope of the dump was staggering.
    "For an idea about how much is 11,500 tons, one metric ton is 1,000 kilograms or about 2,200 pounds, which is close to an English ton. Water is about 8.5 pounds per gallon, so one ton is about 260 gallons," said Gary Was, a professor of nuclear engineering at the University of Michigan. "So 11,500 tons is about 3 million gallons. A spent fuel pool holds around 300,000 gallons. So this amount of water is equivalent to the volume of roughly 10 (spent fuel pools)."
    It could take 50 hours to dump all the water, Tokyo Electric said.
    The dumping of so much radioactive water into the ocean conjures fears of mutated sea life and contamination of the human food chain, but one expert said the radiation will be quickly diluted, minimizing risk.
    "What we have to watch is how these materials accumulate in food products and then could be consumed by people," something that can be monitored, said John Till, president of Risk Assessment Corp.
    "The ocean is so vast that this material would dilute very rapidly and I wouldn't see any lasting effects at all," he said.
    The build-up of water could cause problems around the nuclear facility, which is 240 kilometers (150 miles) north of Tokyo, Edano said Monday.
    Authorities have made a priority of dealing with water from the No. 2 unit, some of which has been gushing into the sea through a crack in a concrete shaft.
    "The radioactivity level is very high near the No. 2 reactor, and we know this. We have to stop the leak as early as possible to prevent this from going into the sea," Edano said. "The radioactivity level is much less in the water from the Nos. 3 and 4 units."
    Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency officials said Monday night that the hope is that pumping out the No. 2 reactor turbine plant will lower the water level enough that contaminated liquid won't be able to reach the sea.
    "I am not able to say for certain whether or not this will be the last discharge, but we certainly would like to avoid releasing any such water into the sea as much as possible," agency spokesman Hidehiko Nishiyama said.
    Officials were still awaiting test results to confirm the water pouring into the ocean is leaking from the highly radioactive No. 2 reactor.
    "We don't know clearly, but we feel it is somehow leaking from Unit 2," Nishiyama said. Even if the water is confirmed to have come from the reactor, neither Tokyo Electric nor government officials know how it is making its way from the reactor to the leaking pit, he said.
    Once the water is pumped out of the waste treatment reservoir, the agency believes it can safely transfer the water from the basement of the No. 2 turbine plant to the reservoir without further leaks, he said.
    Though Japanese officials say the water being discharged is less radioactive than the water now leaking into the sea, its top concentration of radioactive iodine-131 is 20 becquerels per cubic centimeter, or 200,000 becquerels per kilogram. That's 10 times the level of radioactivity permitted in food. But since it's being dumped into the Pacific, it will be quickly diluted, according to Dr. James Cox, a radiation oncologist at Houston's MD Anderson Cancer Center and a CNN consultant.
    Reactors No. 1 and No. 3, which have lower levels of water, need to be drained as well. Tokyo Electric's plan is to pump that water to other storage tanks, including some that still need to be set up.
    Attempts to fill the 20-centimeter (8-inch) crack outside the No. 2 reactor's turbine building -- on Saturday by pouring in concrete, then Sunday by using a chemical compound mixed with sawdust and newspaper -- were not successful.
    As officials mull other ways to cut off the leak at its source, workers will install a silt fence along a damaged sea wall surrounding the plant, Nishiyama said. The aim of this screening, usually used to halt erosion at construction sites, is to prohibit the spread of radioactive particles into the sea.
    Workers also have injected a dye tracer into the water to allow them to track the dispersal of such particles, the spokesman added.
    Addressing the issue quickly is critical because officials believe it is a source of alarmingly high radiation levels in seawater near the plant, as well as in nearby groundwater.
    Complicating the situation is the fact that, in some cases, authorities don't even know how much radiation is getting out.
    After some high-profile errors, little new information on water, ground and air radiation has been released since Thursday. One reason is that the dosimeters being used don't go above 1,000 millisieverts per hour, said Junichi Matsumoto, an executive with Tokyo Electric.
    Authorities know the water in the cracked concrete shaft is emitting at least that much radiation -- which equates, at a minimum, to more than 330 times the dose an average resident of an industrialized country naturally receives in a year.
    Plugging the external leak is job one, in order to prevent the outflow of radiation into the Pacific. But it may not be the most difficult, or important, task ahead.
    Authorities still have to figure out how the tainted water got into the concrete shaft in the first place. The water had to come from somewhere, potentially traveling across melted-down nuclear fuel in the reactor's core before somehow reaching the outside.
    "We were assuming and hoping (that water) would stay in the containment vessel as vapor after being cooled," Nishiyama, the nuclear safety official, said Sunday. "However, it may have flowed into the building, and then the trench."
    Determining why and how that happened -- and what to do about it -- may be "exceptionally challenging," said physicist James Acton, with the Washington-based Carnegie Endowment think tank. Officials may have to inspect a complex array of pipes inside the dangerous radioactive environment inside the containment buildings.
    The state of the Nos. 5 and 6 units is another new problem. Water in their turbine buildings' basements threatens the power supply for the system used to cool nuclear material in these units' spent fuel pools, Edano said. This makes it imperative to pump out that water, which will end up into the sea like that from around the Nos. 3 and 4 units.
    "Though those reactors are stable at the moment, the growing water level in the turbine houses may disturb their stability," he said.
    The effort to keep the Nos. 1, 2 and 3 reactor cores and spent fuel pools cool took a step forward Sunday, when the electricity source powering those three units' cooling systems was switched from a temporary diesel generator to a more permanent, external power supply, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency's website.
    Authorities hope this step, as well as preventing damage to the Nos. 5 and 6 units' power supply, will help to minimize the prospect of any more radiation that might contaminate tap water or food.
    Farmers have pushed for lower standards on radiation in food, calling them unnecessarily stringent. On Monday, Edano said these limits would not change, even as he outlined a process in which sales restrictions on certain crops, in certain areas, would be lifted if they test safe three times in a row.
    In the long run, utility and government officials want to make sure the nuclear fuel, and the potentially cancerous materials it can release, never poses a threat again.
    One option being considered, a Tokyo Electric spokesman said Monday, is to wrap some or all of the reactors' containment buildings in massive amounts of sheeting. But for now, the aim is to make sure that the nuclear fuel rods do not overheat -- and release more radiation into the air, water and ground.
    "Finally, we (need to) establish a long-term policy to cool the reactors," said Nishiyama, while acknowledging that much work needs to be done in the meantime.
    CNN's Matt Smith, Tsukushi Ikeda, Yoko Wakatsuki, Junko Ogura, Midori Nakata, Susan Olson and Martin Savidge contributed to this report

  7. #97


    D*****! How much more can they take? Although apparently the ^ poisoned water has stopped pouring into the Pacific.

    Strongest aftershock since Japan tsunami kills 2

    By JAY ALABASTER and TOMOKO A. HOSAKA, Associated Press Jay Alabaster And Tomoko A. Hosaka, Associated Press – 1 hr 6 mins ago

    Play Video AP – Raw Video: Magnitude 7.4 quake hits Japan coast

    SENDAI, Japan – A strong aftershock ripped through northeastern Japan, killing two, injuring dozens and piling misery on a region still buried under the rubble of last month's devastating tsunami.
    The quake late Thursday was the strongest tremor since the March 11 jumbo and did some damage, but it did not generate a tsunami and appeared to have spared the area's nuclear power plants. The Fukushima Dai-ichi complex — where workers have been frantically trying to cool overheated reactors since they lost cooling systems last month — reported no new abnormalities. Other facilities retained a connection to the grid or switched to diesel generators after the 7.1-magnitude quake knocked out power to much of the area.
    Many people in the area have lived without water and electricity for nearly a month, and the latest tremor sunk more homes into blackness: In total, around 3.6 million households — about 60 percent of residents in the area — were dark Friday, said Souta Nozu, a spokesman for Tohoku Electric Power Co., which serves northern Japan.
    Five conventional plants in the area were out, and it was not clear when power would be restored, he said.
    Matsuko Ito, who has been living in a shelter in the small northeastern city of Natori since the tsunami, said there's no getting used to the terror of being awoken by shaking.
    "I was almost as scared as much as last time," said the 64-year-old while smoking a cigarette outside. "It's enough."
    She said she started screaming when the quake struck around 11:30 p.m.
    "Something has changed," she said. "The world feels strange now. Even the way the clouds move isn't right."
    Thursday's quake initiated a tsunami warning of its own, but it was later canceled. Two people were killed, fire department spokesman Junichi Sawada reported Friday. A 79-year-old man died of shock and a woman in her 60s was killed when power was cut to her oxygen tank. More than 130 people were injured, according to the national police agency.
    The temblor's epicenter was in about the same location as the original 9.0-magnitude tremor, off the eastern coast and about 40 miles (65 kilometers) from Sendai, an industrial city on the eastern coast, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. It was strong enough to shake buildings for about a minute as far away as Tokyo, about 200 miles (330 kilometers) away.
    At a Toyota dealership in Sendai, most of a two-story show window was shattered, and thick shards of glass were heaped in front of the building. Items fell off store shelves and a large automated teller machine crept across the floor at a FamilyMart convenience store.
    Police directed cars through intersections throughout the city on Friday because traffic lights were out. Small electrical fires were reported.
    While the city is far enough inland that it largely escaped tsunami damage, people there lived without regular services for weeks. Within an hour of Thursday's quake, they rushed convenience stores and cleared shelves of ice, water and instant noodles — items that were in short supply after the bigger quake.
    The operator of the tsunami-ravaged Fukushima Dai-ichi plant said there was no sign the aftershock had caused new problems there. Workers briefly retreated to a quake-resistant shelter in the complex and suffered no injuries.
    After the March 11 quake knocked out power in the region, the wave flooded the plant's diesel generators, leaving the complex without any electricity. Workers have been struggling to stem a tide of radiation since, using makeshift methods to pump cooling water into the reactors. That work continued uninterrupted after the latest quake, according to Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency.
    Other facilities along the northeastern coast remained connected to a power source Friday, and the agency said they were all under control. Backup generators kicked in at two — Rokkasho and Higashidori.
    At a third north of Sendai — which has been shut down since the tsunami — one of three power lines was supplying electricity, and radiation monitoring devices detected no abnormalities. The Onagawa power plant's spent fuel pools briefly lost cooling capacity, but it resumed because a power line was available for electricity.
    "It's the way it's supposed to work if power is lost for any reason," said David Lochbaum, director of the nuclear safety project for the U.S.-based Union of Concerned Scientists.

  8. #98
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    New York City


    Re the bolded part ^, you'd feel the same way if you went through that and many people after 9/11 felt the same way here. The world is no different, always has been and always will be a dangerous place - and of course we all die one day

  9. #99


    I would feel that way even if it wasn't a large-scale tragedy. Human's thinking gets skewed to one degree or another by everything that happens to them. Even if I went through a deeply personal, horrible tragedy I'd feel the same way. As I said, I don't know how much more they can take, nevermind the thinking about dying part.

  10. #100
    Crabby airline hostess - stache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Nairobi Hilton


    The Japanese are a resilient people. They are probably the best equipped people to handle this tragedy.

  11. #101


    True, & their reverence for their elders makes me admire them even more.

  12. #102
    Chief Antagonist Ninjahedge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003


    For them to have to accept help from anyone outside their nation is very humiliating.....

    I hope that the nations helping can do it right and help bridge this cultural divide that still seems to keep japan just a little bit out of arms reach when it comes to accepting people from other nations (this is most apparent in leadership positions in public and private sectors....).

    Sometimes a tragedy does more to heal than good times. Lets hope this is the case for this latest one.
    Last edited by Ninjahedge; April 11th, 2011 at 01:09 PM.

  13. #103
    Forum Veteran MidtownGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    East Midtown


    help bridge this cultural divide that still seems to keep japan just a little biy out of arms reach when it comes to accepting people from other nations
    That was a very diplomatic way of saying they're as racist as hell over there.

  14. #104


    Quote Originally Posted by mariab View Post
    True, & their reverence for their elders makes me admire them even more.
    A major problem is that most of them, or a least a larger % than in most societies, are elders. Not what you need when you have to dig yourself out of a situation like this.

  15. #105


    Somewhat of a myth, like the kamikaze thing, that the population of Japan is significantly older than that of other developed countries.

    Japan has the highest percentage of people over 60 years of age (about 25%), but Germany and Italy are about the same. On a regional basis, Europe is the highest.

    To get a better idea of how a population group is able to handle a crisis, you should look at what's called an Age Dependency Ratio, where elderly and children are measured against the work-force.

    Map - Age Dependency Ratio

Page 7 of 13 FirstFirst ... 34567891011 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software