Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 97

Thread: Pier 57 - Hudson River Park

  1. #16
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,752

    Default

    New York Daily News - http://www.nydailynews.com

    What's up dock?

    By WILLIAM SHERMAN
    DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
    Sunday, March 6th, 2005

    It's the heavyweight real estate duel of the season. Two of the city's most powerful men are battling to the finish in a highly charged competition wrapped in cash, influence and high-level politics.

    The victor's prize is the right to develop a choice piece of public Hudson River waterfront: the 470,000 square feet available at Pier 57 at 15th St.

    In one corner is patrician Roland Betts, CEO of Chelsea Piers - and pal and former Yale frat brother of President Bush.

    Betts is a scion of a monied family with close ties to Mayor Bloomberg's administration as well.

    He was a principal owner of the Texas Rangers baseball team, whose partners included Bush, before the team was sold at a tremendous profit six years ago.

    Betts, a financier, also has raised more than $1 billion to finance Hollywood movies that paid off handsomely, and in 1994 founded the sports and entertainment complex that takes up four piers running north from 16th St.

    In the other corner: upstart Steven Witkoff, who parlayed investments in a few tenements in his native Bronx into a massive real estate portfolio.

    One of Witkoff's deals, buying the 29-story building at 100 Wall St., netted him and his partners a cool $21 million when he sold it five months later in 1998.

    Witkoff knows Gov. Pataki well and is friendly with Charles Gargano, the Pataki-appointed state economic development czar.

    Witkoff and Betts have a few things in common. Both are lawyers and devoted family men with children. Both have given money and time to charity.

    Both also have street credibility. Witkoff knows construction and plumbing first-hand. Betts taught public school in Harlem for seven years after finishing graduate school.

    And both are scarred veterans of real estate battles who usually get what they want.

    The judges of Betts vs. Witkoff are the 13 board members of the Hudson River Park Trust, the government agency managing Pier 57 and the riverfront from the bottom of Manhattan to 59th St.

    Five of the board members are appointed by the mayor, five by the governor and three by the Manhattan borough president. They include Lehman Brothers managing director Theodore Roosevelt 4th, Deputy Mayor Daniel Doctoroff, state Parks Commissioner Bernadette Castro and city Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe.

    "We'll decide on what's best for the park, what's best for the community and which will generate the most income," said Charles Dorkey, an attorney Pataki made chairman of the trust.

    How much revenue the competing plans would produce for the trust and Hudson River Park is a major concern of the board, said Dorkey.

    Betts' proposal would pay rent that rises from $300,000 in the first year to $1.5 million in the fifth. The Witkoff proposal would pay $1.5 million the first year, going up to $2 million in the sixth.

    But the relative benefits to the community and the accessibility of the facilities are also concerns, said Dorkey.

    Publicly, elected officials have taken no position on the plans. Behind the scenes, however, the battle is raging - with both sides campaigning hard for the critical votes, belittling each other's proposals and using their considerable political leverage.

    For example, both Witkoff and Betts, as well as other officers of Chelsea Piers, have made significant contributions to Pataki's political campaigns.

    Witkoff has contributed more than $100,000, according to records and interviews, while Betts and other Chelsea Piers officers have given more than $27,000.

    Both Witkoff and Betts declined to be interviewed, citing a confidentiality agreement with the trust. But top sources in the competing camps agreed to talk to the Daily News, outlining their proposals while pounding away at each other.

    Witkoff's plan, called Leonardo at Pier 57, features a two-story pedestrian street with Italian shops, crafts stores and art galleries and a museum dedicated to Leonardo da Vinci. There's also a marina and a 46,000-square-foot rooftop park with a swimming pool.

    The big money-making part of Witkoff's design, however, is downstairs: nearly 100,000 square feet of ballrooms, banquet facilities and terraces, the largest such event space in the city.

    It would be run by Giuseppe Cipriani, the restaurateur and reigning king of the city's banquet business. Cipriani has a 20% piece of Witkoff's proposed project.

    The Betts proposal emphasizes sports, including a 30,000-square-foot aquatics center. There would be nine tennis courts on the roof.

    The second-floor plan features a dance center and seafood restaurant, while the first floor is focused on an historic-ships education center and a marina.

    "You look at the Witkoff plan, the Cipriani banquets will have 3,000 people showing up ... so that area of the West Side will be a gigantic parking lot," said the Chelsea Piers source.

    "Face it - all they want to do is make a ton of money from the banquet business. What good does that do the community?" he said.

    Pier 57 is only a block south of Chelsea Piers, which has its own lucrative banquet business.

    The Witkoff group source fired back that traffic would cause no problems for the community or the narrow strip of the West Side Highway in the area.

    "How many times a year do you think we'll have 3,000 people at a banquet?" said the Witkoff proponent. "We've got studies showing there's a big need for banquet facilities.

    "Anyway, why should Chelsea Piers be afraid of a little competition? Isn't this America?

    "We're going to have free photographic and art projects, we'll have a free museum on Leonardo da Vinci and the Italian government is going to lend us one of his paintings," the Witkoff source added.

    The Betts source fired back: "Kids and families are interested in sports, not in galleries, and besides, I don't think they'll ever be able to pay the rent they're promising the trust.

    "Their figures are pie in the sky. Ours are real, because we've already done it at Chelsea Piers."

    Proponents of the Betts plan have charged that Cipriani is connected to organized crime. Last year a government witness in the trial of Peter Gotti testified that Cipriani paid the mob $120,000 to keep unions out of his Rainbow Room restaurant at Rockefeller Center.

    "That's a bunch of crap. I don't know any of those [Gotti] guys," Cipriani told The News. "Never happened."

    Witkoff seems to have a slight edge in the battle. Community Planning Board 2, which is advising the trust, is backing his plan - "very conditionally because of the traffic problems that still have to be resolved," said Ed Kirkland, a member of the board.

    But Betts should not be counted out.

    Steven Witkoff

    Age: 46

    Born: The Bronx

    College: Union College

    Law school: Hofstra University

    Business: Real estate

    Politics: Independent

    Residence: East Side

    Close friends and associates: Childhood friends

    Committees: Board of the Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum, NYC Real Estate Board

    Previous financial backers: Lehman Brothers
    Political contributions: Gov. Pataki, state Republican Committee, state Democratic Committee
    Key items IN Pier 57 development plan: Italian crafts; retail; cultural center; marina; 87,000-square-foot ballroom/banquet facility; restaurant; 46,000-square-foot rooftop park.

    Roland Betts

    Age: 58

    Born: Laurel Hollow, L.I.

    College: Yale

    Law school: Columbia University

    Business: Successful film financier, partner in the Texas Rangers baseball team, owner of Chelsea Piers.

    Politics: Democrat

    Residence: West Side

    Close friends and associates: President Bush, Deputy Mayor Dan Doctoroff

    Committees: U.S. Olympic Committee, Lower Manhattan Development Corp.

    Previous financial backers: Morgan Stanley & Co.

    Political contributions: Gov. Pataki and state legislators.

    Key items IN Pier 57 development plan: Art galleries; dance center; 30,000-square-foot pool and aquatic center; rooftop tennis center with nine courts; marina; restaurants; other commercial space.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/loca...p-245802c.html

  2. #17

    Default Anyone know what happened behind closed doors ?

    Board of Directors Meeting
    March 10, 2005
    4 pm
    Hudson River Park Trust
    Pier 40
    West St. at W. Houston St.
    2nd Floor Conference Room
    New York, New York 10014
    Please take note that the only item on the Agenda will be an Executive Session to discuss the Pier 57 Proposals. The Executive Session will not be open to the public.

  3. #18

    Default

    New York Times
    April 7, 2005

    Cipriani Wins Bid for Italian Makeover of a West Side Pier

    By CHARLES V. BAGLI


    An artist's depiction of the joint proposal for the Leonardo at Pier 57. It would include the city's largest banquet hall, and a branch of the Leonardo da Vinci Museum in Milan that would feature Leonardo's work.

    After 18 months of review and a fierce battle between two rival bidders, a state park board has chosen a group led by Giuseppe Cipriani, scion of the family behind Harry's Bar in Venice, to transform a dilapidated 880-foot pier at 15th Street and the Hudson River into a development of museums, stores and cultural workshops with an Italian theme.

    The board's decision infuriated the losing bidder, Chelsea Piers, whose president, Tom Bernstein, called it "a highly questionable use of the waterfront."

    The latest addition planned for the $154 million project, "The Leonardo at Pier 57," is a branch of the Leonardo da Vinci Museum in Milan that would feature a rotating exhibition of the artist's paintings, inventions and other works.

    But the project's largest element, and the one that drew the most criticism, is what would be the city's largest banquet hall.

    The Leonardo at Pier 57 still faces an environmental review and lease negotiations, but if the developers are successful, it will be the latest element in the development of a five-mile waterfront park along the Hudson River. The Hudson River Park Trust, which controls the pier and selected the development plan, hopes that it will generate enough rent to maintain and expand the park.

    "We've gone through a painstaking and transparent process to come up with a great new use for Pier 57," said Charles Dorkey, chairman of the park trust. "While many steps remain, we believe this will be a great addition to the waterfront."

    The project would also include a one-acre rooftop park, art galleries, a marina and a branch of the Triennale di Milano design museum. Mr. Cipriani, who operates the Rainbow Room, would operate the banquet hall and event space. His partners are Steven C. Witkoff, a developer, and Plaza Construction.

    "Giuseppe and I feel this is going to be an opportunity to create a waterfront development that will attract people from the city and well beyond," Mr. Witkoff said

    But Mr. Bernstein said that the Leonardo's banquet hall would cause enormous traffic problems and compete with similar event spaces at Chelsea Piers, the sports complex three blocks north of Pier 57.

    "It's hard to believe that putting in the city's largest banquet hall is the best use of the waterfront," he said. "The parking and traffic problems are still unresolved."

    Mr. Dorkey said that the board felt that Cipriani-Witkoff proposal offered more public space, a better design, new cultural attractions and a better economic deal for the park.

    In its losing bid, Chelsea Piers had proposed a family swimming center and a marina, with space for art galleries and studios.

    Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company

  4. #19
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,298

    Thumbs up

    Personally, I was expecting Chelsea Piers to win, so this is good. Their criticism, however biased, was expected.

  5. #20
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Garden City, LI
    Posts
    1,778

    Default

    I like the plan, I think it's pretty original and should be a success. I do think, though, that Chelsea should have won Pier 57 and this should be on another pier or made part of Pier 40. I would love to see this completed, though...soon.

  6. #21

    Default missing the point

    Chelsea Piers came up with an uninteresting (why tennis courts?) and unresponsive proposal (read the original RFP about respecting the history of the site and not increasing the height) believing only that their money and contacts would prevail. What they did do was to hog a finalist slot thereby eliminating the community-originated proposals which both needed to be "massaged" by the TRUST to solidify the financial underpinnings.

    Leonardo's was started by James Ortenzio (former HRPT Board Chair and that's his Henry Stern parkname) and championed throughout the process by him to stop Chelsea Piers.

    By the end, they had absorbed (taken? stolen?) many of the good (read original) ideas and people from the community-originated proposals. Why celebrate Italy (read the original RFP) ? How do you justify a $154 mil project on a limited footprint with a finite income stream (the community proposals were told that they couldn't generate enough for a $120 mil project) ? All of the complaints about traffic seemed justified (it might take a few hours...do the math... to get your car out of the elevator from the stacked parking in the basement)...warehousing cars on the waterfront really would interact badly with the existing activities at Chelsea Piers.

    The TRUST is controlled by the Governor. The staff seemed earnest, but the process was/is so political that Dorkey (Ortenzio's successor) immediately went on the defensive in the Times article backtracking to defend the decision-making process. Chelsea Piers will sue the TRUST... Leonardo's has "over-promised" what can be financed and operated successfully. It's not over yet.

  7. #22
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,278

    Default

    Much more interesting than more Chelsea Piers, but I can't help thinking there's a more exciting idea out there somewhere. Roof park sounds nice. More renderings from curbed:



  8. #23
    Moderator NYatKNIGHT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Manhattan - South Village
    Posts
    4,240

    Default

    Yeah, that roof park sounds very nice - public access like that is what Chelsea Piers doesn't have.

  9. #24
    Banned Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Park Slope, Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    8,113

    Default

    Based on the finalists, they picked the right one. Chelsea piers is not a friendly place to visit unless you're a member or attending a function there. Private facilities of public parkland should be absolutely minimized.

  10. #25

    Default

    Pier 57 in August 2005.


  11. #26
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Garden City, LI
    Posts
    1,778

    Default

    No movement on this yet, huh?

    While HRP is wonderful and will be amazing when completed, the lack of progress on 57 and 40 is disappointing to say the least. These are major attractions for the park, and revenue generators. They need to be built.

  12. #27

    Default Playing by the rules?

    According to the HRPT RFP for Pier 57, after the award was made to the Witcoff/Cipriani Group, they had a small window to do their due diligence (30 days?) then they had to put up a deposit and submit their final plans for approval by the various layers of bureaucracy. The time for all of this has long since passed without any word from the park planners. Chelsea Piers will probably sue because of the impossible traffic plan which would add another year to the process. Welcome to waterfront politics !

  13. #28

    Question Leonardo on pier 57

    The new project going up on the Hudson River is the "Leonardo on pier 57" which I think will be a very popular (year round) attraction. However, one of the feasibility issues for the new development was how to transport many people and/or vehicles accross the six lane hhparkway.

    Somewhere (perhaps on wired) I saw a new item showing a proposed link between the "High Line" and "Leonardo on pier 57". I think that is a great idea.

    Any info out there about the high line connection.

    The only link I have is from what I read on Curbed.com ===[URL=http://www.curbed.com]

  14. #29
    Disgruntled Optimist lofter1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    NYC - Downtown
    Posts
    32,654

    Default

    ^ What's so bad about waiting for the red light and walking across the cross-walk?

    Per info, this is from the Downtown Express @ 9.24.04 (however this project sounds wrong for the site, especially considering the concerns about access & traffic; see below) :

    Trust considers two plans for Pier 57

    http://www.downtownexpress.com/de_72...siderstwo.html

    Steve Witkoff, who owns Lower Manhattan’s landmark Woolworth Building, and Giuseppe Cipriani, principals in the Leonardo on Pier 57 plan, made the presentation Wednesday with a major change from an earlier public presentation: the addition of a pedestrian bridge from the High Line at 10th Ave. and 15th St. over the West Side Highway to Pier 57.

    The High Line, the derelict elevated railroad that runs from Gansevoort St. to 33rd St. along the west side of 10th Ave., is to be converted into a 1.5-miled elevated park as part of the redevelopment of West Chelsea and the Hudson Yards district to the north.

    Cipriani would also establish a floating swimming pool, which could serve in winter as an ice rink, on a barge at 14th St. just south of Pier 57. In addition, the barge now on the north side of Pier 63 and operated as Pier 63 Maritime by John Krevey, would become Pier 57 Maritime and move to the end of the swimming pool barge. Pier 57 Maritime would have a flotilla of historic ships including the Lightship Frying Pan, the Fireboat John J. Harvey and the sailing vessel Anne, whose owner and builder, Reid Stowe, testified on Wednesday for the Cipriani project.

    An Italian crafts, retail and cultural center in a two-story arcade simulating an Italian street is the central feature of Leonardo at Pier 57. The plan also has a restaurant, event space and a marina and nautical store. The plan also calls for parking for more than 300 cars, in the deep caissons that secure the east and west ends of the pier.



    This is from The Villager @ 12.01.04:

    Traffic jam over Pier 57, as consultants’ studies clash

    http://www.thevillager.com/villager_...verpier57.html

    In the wake of a recent recommendation by a community working group about the redevelopment of Pier 57, the two rivals for the project have commissioned competing traffic studies in the hope of influencing a decision expected soon by the Hudson River Park Trust.

    ... The Working Group voted in favor of Leonardo on Pier 57 recently. And soon after, Chelsea Piers commissioned Schwartz to do a traffic study. Schwartz found that the Leonardo project would cause unprecedented congestion on the West Side Highway, have a negative impact on the Hudson River Park bikeway and walkway and make it harder to get in and out of the sports and entertainment complex, which Chelsea Piers developed and has been operating on Piers 59, 60, 61 and 62 for the past 11 years.


    You can also check this thread:

    http://wirednewyork.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2954

  15. #30
    Disgruntled Optimist lofter1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    NYC - Downtown
    Posts
    32,654

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by infoshare
    I saw a new item showing a proposed link between the "High Line" and "Leonardo on pier 57". I think that is a great idea.
    I think that could be really problematic (using the High Line as an access point to a commercial area that is described as very high volume).

    Part of the glory of the High Line is that it is removed from the city. Of course the development of the park will change what it is now, but the High Line should not be allowed to become a "short cut" across the West Side Hiway.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Pier 40 - Hudson River Park
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For New Yorkers
    Replies: 469
    Last Post: April 2nd, 2015, 04:15 AM
  2. Hudson River Park
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For New Yorkers
    Replies: 383
    Last Post: July 3rd, 2014, 05:21 PM
  3. Pier 45 - Hudson River Park
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For New Yorkers
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: July 10th, 2012, 10:58 PM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: April 26th, 2011, 04:09 AM
  5. Third Avenue Bridge - Across Harlem River
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For Visitors
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 10th, 2002, 06:36 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software