Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Bronx Whitestone Bridge

  1. #1

    Default Bronx Whitestone Bridge

    http://www.mta.nyc.ny.us/bandt/html/bronxw.htm

    Before the Bronx Whitestone Bridge opened on April 29, 1939, the Triborough Bridge, five miles to the west, provided the only vehicular connection between Queens and the Bronx. The Bronx Whitestone opened to traffic a mere 23 months after the awarding of its first construction contract so that motorists could cross it on April 30, the opening day of the 1939 New York World's Fair in Flushing Meadow Park.

    Today, the bridge looks as modern and elegant as when it served as the gateway to the fair's "World of Tomorrow." As part of the massive bridge project two major recreational areas were developed, Ferry Point Park in the Bronx and Francis Lewis Park in Queens.

    The bridge spans the East River. On the Bronx side are the residential communities of Unionport and Schuylerville and connections to the Hutchinson River Parkway, the Bruckner Expressway, and the Cross Bronx Expressway. On the Queens side are the residential communities of Whitestone and Malba and connections to the Cross Island Parkway and the Whitestone Expressway.


    From NYCroads.com:
    http://www.nycroads.com/crossings/bronx-whitestone/

    PROPOSING A NEW QUEENS-BRONX SPAN: In 1905, speculators proposed construction of a bridge over the East River from Whitestone, Queens to Ferry Point in the Bronx. In anticipation of the bridge, developers built the upscale neighborhoods of Malba, Beechhurst in the northern Queens community of Whitestone, along the East River shoreline. Facing opposition from area residents, who feared that the rural character of Queens would be destroyed, the proposed bridge was shelved.

    Nearly a quarter century later, in 1929, the influential Regional Plan Association (RPA) revived plans for a fixed crossing between north-central Queens and the Bronx. The bridge, which was to be part of an "inner belt" in New York's circumferential highway system, would enable motorists to travel between Long Island, upstate New York and New England without passing through high-density areas in western Queens. On February 25, 1930, as part of his plan to expand his parkway system into New York City, Robert Moses, who served as New York City parks commissioner and arterial coordinator, proposed a "Ferry Point-Whitestone Bridge" that would enable motorists from the Bronx and Westchester to reach his Long Island state parks.

    As the 1930's progressed, Moses had additional reasons to construct the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge. First, when it opened in 1936, traffic filled the eight lanes of the Triborough Bridge between Manhattan, the Bronx and Queens. The bridge was to provide relief for the Triborough Bridge. Second, the bridge was to provide a link from the north to the new airport at North Beach, which eventually became known as LaGuardia Airport. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the bridge was to provide a direct link for upstate New York and New England motorists to reach the 1939-1940 World's Fair, which Moses chaired.

    Moses received authorization to build the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge from the New York State Legislature in April 1937. The new bridge was to be administered by Moses' new Triborough Bridge Authority.

    Still, the bridge proposal ran into opposition. Local residents were displeased at the quick decision by Moses to raze 17 homes in Malba. Moses defended his decision, responding that the condemnation was necessary to complete the project on time. Objections were also raised by the RPA, which said that the bridge should not be built unless provisions were made for rail transit. While the RPA said that the transit tie-in would not have to be immediate, the bridge structure would have to be strong enough to handle both vehicle and rail traffic. To Moses' favor, the RPA had no serious allies on its proposal.




    On the Queens side of the Bronx Whitestone Bridge lies the residential community of Malba.




    The Francis Lewis Park in Queens in the shadow of the Bronx Whitestone Bridge.


  2. #2

    Default Bronx Whitestone Bridge

    The original Bronx Whitestone was more elegant, but not as stable. Similar in design to the Tacoma Narrows (Galloping Gertie), it was reinforced after Tacoma Narrows collapsed. In the 40s, bracing was installed at the towers, as were the trusses that run above the roadway. In the mid 80s, a tuned mass damper was installed on the bridge to eliminate wind induced oscillations.

    The problem now is that all the alterations have made the bridge too heavy for the cable system. Another project is underway to reduce the weight of the span. The steel trusses will be replaced with a composite material.

  3. #3
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Garden City, LI
    Posts
    1,778

    Default Bronx Whitestone Bridge

    NICE! *I live in a "devlopment" that was carved out of the park on the other side of the water from Malba. *I see the bridge and water from my balcony! *It's very relaxing.

    Man, is super nice is Malba and Beechhurst (and Whitestone, too) - HUGE houses. *One piece of junk was bought for $1.5 mil, knocked down, and they're replacing it with a 10K sq. ft. house. *A lot of Meditteranean style houses, too.

    Well, enough of me. *Just wanted to share.

  4. #4

    Default Bronx Whitestone Bridge

    That is not quite correct.

    While there were differences with Tacoma-Narrows (2 lane roadway), the bridge did oscillate in high winds. The trusses were not immediately added. Cable stays were installed in 1940, but that did not correct the problem. The bridge was closed in 1943 during high winds. The trusses were added in 1946.

    The bridge was closed again in the 60s during a storm. Then the mass damper was added. If the trusses aren't needed, why
    bother replacing them with lighter material - just remove them.

  5. #5

    Default Bronx Whitestone Bridge

    I agree. I didn't mean to imply that the bridge was unsafe.
    I remember reading somewhere that the lead engineer argued that the bridge would not collapse, but Moses said it didn't matter if no one used it.

    Is there any chance the retrofit will restore the pedestrian walkway?

  6. #6

    Default Bronx Whitestone Bridge

    They should add one as soon as possible. (Ditto for the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge.)

    I'm glad to learn it will be restored to its original elegance.

  7. #7

    Default Bronx Whitestone Bridge

    Is there a bike path?

  8. #8

  9. #9

    Default Bronx Whitestone Bridge

    On the above site, report on how easy it would be to install
    a bikeway and separate walkway on Verrazano, since it was designed to have them. There is space on both sides of the upper roadway between the inner and outer cables.

    What a view that would be.

  10. #10
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    West Harlem
    Posts
    2,805

    Default Bronx Whitestone Bridge

    There's a plan to add a walkway fairly soon.

  11. #11

    Default

    October 12, 2003

    WHITESTONE

    A Onetime Thing of Beauty Gets a Little Prettying Up

    By ALISA ROTH

    When the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge opened in 1939, Robert Moses called it the finest suspension bridge ever. He admired the two tall and narrow towers that supported the pale green span and praised what he described as its "light-ness and absence of pretentious ornamentation.''

    Barely two years later, the bridge, which had been designed by Othman Ammann, the Swiss engineer whose legacy also included the George Washington and Verrazano-Narrows Bridges, got a little less beautiful. A series of stabilizing braces were installed that obstructed its elegant lines and weighed down its light form.

    The bracing was a clumsy attempt to stabilize the Whitestone after the Tacoma-Narrows Bridge, a similar structure in Washington State, collapsed spectacularly in high winds in 1940.

    Now, thanks to new developments in aerodynamics and structural engineering, the bridge is being returned to the original form that Moses so admired. A 30-month, $32 million project, scheduled to be completed this year, is replacing the heavy steel trusses with lightweight fiberglass fairings, which will also make the bridge safer.

    The fairings are triangular pieces that, in effect, ''slice'' the wind so that it doesn't hit the bridge head on.

    "The fairing has an extraordinary capacity to reduce the kinds of motion that can cause damage,'' said Michael C. Ascher, president of the M.T.A. Bridges and Tunnels. "The fairing is really just a means of streamlining the bridge and giving it a shape so that the air flows around it very smoothly.''

    The roadway will also be replaced with a lighter, stiffening surface.

    What is not clear is whether the additional supports added to the Whitestone Bridge over the last six decades were necessary: "Whether the retrofitting would have gone on if Tacoma hadn't gone down is difficult to say," said Richard Scott, author of the 2002 book "In the Wake of Tacoma: Suspension Bridges and the Quest for Aerodynamic Stability.''

    How much the heavy metal trusses and other fixes really stabilized the bridge is also unclear; a recent study showed that the trusses did little to reduce the kinds of motions that put the bridge in danger.

    Studies also showed that the various additions were putting unnecessary strain on the old bridge structure, Mr. Ascher said. He hopes that the new fairings will work so well that all of the old supports can be removed, bringing the bridge's design even closer to the original form.

    But, he added: "The structural needs have really driven this project. The aesthetics are an added bonus."


    Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company

  12. #12

    Default

    Work almost complete

  13. #13

    Default

    That is a beautiful bridge. Sometimes when I go visit my cousins over in Paramus, NJ I drive over that bridge. I love the late-evening look to it.

  14. #14

    Default

    February 18, 2005

    A Bridge Too Fat

    By SEWELL CHAN

    Graphics: Part One | Part Two

    he Bronx-Whitestone Bridge has a weight problem.

    Over the decades, the 65-year-old suspension bridge has been bulked up to make it more stable. But now engineers have decided that it has grown too beefy.

    "We put this bridge on a diet," said Michael C. Ascher, the president of M.T.A. Bridges and Tunnels, an arm of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. "Here's a bridge that's 65 years old. It got a little heavy around the midsection. Just like with the human anatomy, as you get on in years, lean is better. In this case, instead of putting an extra strain on your heart and other organs, it's putting a strain on the supporting structure, the skeleton, of the bridge."

    When the work is completed a year from now, the steel and concrete bridge will have shed 6,000 tons, or one-quarter of its total suspended weight. Engineers say the decreased weight will reduce the strain on the bridge's steel cables, make it more durable and lengthen its life by decades, if not centuries.

    Last year, workers completed the removal of steel trusses that were installed on each side of the bridge in 1946, after the notorious collapse of a bridge in Washington State. In June, they will begin replacing the bridge's concrete deck with a lightweight steel version that is being built in Brazil.

    The project to decrease the bridge's load, which follows years of wind and stress tests on laboratory models, is possible because of advances in aerodynamic design.

    The Bronx-Whitestone Bridge has long been known for its slim and graceful profile. It was built in less than two years to serve visitors to the New York World's Fair in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park and it opened to traffic on April 29, 1939 - the day before the start of the fair.

    Stretching 2,300 feet between its two towers, the span was the fourth longest in the world. At the ribbon-cutting, Robert Moses, the highways and parks czar who oversaw the bridge's construction, called it "architecturally the finest bridge of them all."

    But a year later, a catastrophe on the West Coast shook that image.

    On Nov. 7, 1940, the deck of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge twisted itself apart and plunged into the water below during a fierce windstorm. No one was killed, but the collapse, captured on film, instantly became one of the most infamous engineering failures in history.

    The prevailing theories in bridge design at the time paid little heed to aerodynamics, according to Henry Petroski, a professor of civil engineering and of history at Duke University who has written extensively on bridge design.

    "The idea that a bridge roadway or a deck could undulate, could be moved vertically by the wind - that was just not thought to be something to worry about," he said. "The idea was to make the deck, the roadway of the bridge, as slender as possible. The aesthetic model was driving this, and it was generally thought that these bridges were so big, massive and heavy, built of steel and concrete, that the wind was just not going to move them. And that was wrong."

    Even before the Bronx-Whitestone opened, engineers noticed that its deck would occasionally sway in the wind and shift back and forth, lengthwise, between the two steel towers.

    The Bronx-Whitestone was neither as long nor as narrow as the Tacoma Narrows, but the same engineer, Leon S. Moisseiff, had worked on both bridges. The chief engineer of the New York bridge, Othmar H. Ammann, was on a commission that investigated the failure of the Washington bridge.

    Mr. Ammann insisted that the Bronx-Whitestone was stable, but its pendulum-like movement alarmed drivers and pedestrians and Mr. Moses ordered it stiffened.

    "He felt that the risk of losing motorists and therefore revenue far outweighed what the engineers said and that this perception of instability was unacceptable," said Darl Rastorfer, the author of "Six Bridges: The Legacy of Othmar H. Ammann" (Yale University Press, 2000).

    In 1940, diagonal stiffening cables were installed on the bridge. In 1946, two steel trusses were erected on the sides of the bridge to stiffen it more. The trusses resulted in the elimination of the pedestrian walkways and the widening of the bridge from four to six lanes of traffic.

    Bridge enthusiasts lamented that the installation of the trusses marred the bridge's aesthetic qualities. "It ruined the view of the skyline of Manhattan," Professor Petroski said.

    As if those changes were not enough, engineers installed one more device - a counterbalance known as a mass damper - to the underside of the bridge in 1986 as yet another component for stability. Finally, an increase in traffic - from 6.3 million vehicles in 1940 to 45.2 million last year - has added stress, although the weight of the bridge itself is the greatest concern for engineers.

    As a result of all this, the bridge has become too heavy and increasingly vulnerable to wear and tear. "Every time we added features, we were adding to the weight of the bridge," Mr. Ascher said.

    To increase the bridge's longevity, engineers looked for ways to make the bridge lighter, while maintaining its ability to withstand wind. They also recruited help from engineers at two universities. In December 1998, Canadian scientists attached devices to the bridge to measure wind and vibration. Over two years, the data was transmitted to the University of Western Ontario.

    Researchers there also built miniature models of the bridge made of "aluminum and some balsa wood and some plastic and some piano wire," according to J. Peter C. King, a civil engineer who directs the university's wind-tunnel laboratory.

    The models were put in a 200-foot-long wind tunnel, which simulated average winds of 140 miles an hour and gusts of 210 miles an hour. The latter figure would represent winds stronger than a devastating hurricane.

    Dr. King concluded that replacing the concrete deck with lightweight steel, removing the trusses and re-evaluating the need for the mass damper could yield more sophisticated ways of keeping the bridge stable.

    "The thought at the time was more brute force - let's throw more stiffness at it and see what happens - rather than to try something more elegant or subtle," he said.

    Meanwhile, at Lehigh University, in Bethlehem, Pa., researchers made a prototype of the proposed steel deck. Over nine months, they simulated the effects of a truck passing over the deck 239 million times. That amounts to about 175 years of traffic - about a century longer than the 75-year minimum life span for the new, post-diet bridge.

    Last April, workers completed the replacement of the trusses with wind fairings - lightweight fiberglass structures that slice and deflect the wind as it buffets the bridge. The project, which cost $32 million, restored the bridge to its original appearance.

    This spring, the replacement of the deck will start.

    One lane will be closed to traffic at any time, but a temporary movable barrier will allow three lanes of traffic to move in the peak direction - toward the Bronx in the morning, toward Queens in the evening - during the commuter rush. The work is expected to last 101/2 months and cost $136.7 million.

    Instead of the old asphalt coating, the new deck will have a surface of epoxy and sand to prevent skidding. For drivers, the only noticeable change will be the end of potholes.

    At 61, Mr. Ascher is four years younger than the bridge. He described its re-engineering as one of the most intellectually challenging projects in his nearly 15 years at the bridge and tunnel agency.

    "I think the bridge is in better shape than I am," Mr. Ascher said. "In many respects, I envy engineers coming into this business now for the first time. Technology has changed so dramatically that there are new, exciting, innovative ways to extend the lives, almost indefinitely, of these structures. I wish I was much younger and just coming in now, rather than being at the twilight of my career."

    Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company

  15. #15

    Default

    As of right now, no pedestrian walkway and no plans for it. Its a shame. It would be so convenient to have a bike path to Queens from the east side of Bronx

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Queensboro (59th Street) Bridge
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For Visitors
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: March 10th, 2015, 06:10 AM
  2. Manhattan Bridge
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For Visitors
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: April 28th, 2014, 09:35 AM
  3. Triborough Bridge
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For Visitors
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: August 22nd, 2011, 11:35 PM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: April 26th, 2011, 05:09 AM
  5. The gantry of the float bridge of New York Central Railroad
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For Visitors
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: March 21st, 2011, 05:16 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software