Page 39 of 39 FirstFirst ... 293536373839
Results 571 to 574 of 574

Thread: Hudson Rail Tunnel - Access to the Regionís Core (ARC)

  1. #571
    Disgruntled Optimist lofter1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    NYC - Downtown
    Posts
    32,654

    Default

    The big boy handled it "perfectly politically" until folks started doing some fact checking. How will the commuters who are stuck in the tunnel feel about him once they get the real picture. The Gov is a total smart ALEC.

  2. #572
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    130

    Default

    Gov. Christie may be a smart ALEC, but he is also a cafone. Indeed "Gov. Cafone" fits him like a size 60 portly suit.
    Last edited by ttk; April 11th, 2012 at 10:41 PM.

  3. #573

    Default

    How does he define succeed?

    Is the New Jersey tunnel project too big to succeed? The economistís view.






    By David Rothschild | The Signal Ė 8 hrs ago

    Anyone who commutes in to New York from New Jersey knows that the smallest glitch can throw the entire rail system into chaos, delaying 1,300 trains worth of people. Many argue that there is an urgent need for a new rail link between the two states, but viable plans to build such a thing have yet to materialize.
    Here's the economist's outlook on the problem: While a new rail link would provide positive returns for society, neither private nor public institutions are properly incentivized to make it happen.
    Traffic on the current rail links, two 100 year old tunnels, is at full capacity and demand will only increase over time. Lawmakers and analysts dispute the cost of building a new tunnel, but it's generally estimated to be in the neighborhood of $10 billion. It will take decades to recoup the investment. This type of massive-scale infrastructure is beyond the scope of any corporation, but not for the simple reason of scale. Consortiums of private institutions can raise massive amounts of money. But can you imagine anyone in the private sector investing in a project that may not earn money for several generations?

    More important is that the project would have many positive "externalities," or societal benefits that no owner can capture and charge for. If 100 people need to get from New Jersey to New York City every day, society benefits from them sitting in a single train, rather than 100 automobiles: less pollution and less congestion. But the owner of the train or the tunnel it goes through cannot charge one person for the value of slightly cleaner air. Only a government can internalize the value of clean air for all.
    While the government can value something like clean air, it is not good at valuing long term investments. In the same way that corporations are obsessed with daily stock prices and quarterly earnings, politicians are obsessed with monthly poll numbers and biennial elections.

    In spite of all these obstacles, a new rail link was very close to becoming a reality in 2010 until New Jersey Governor Chris Christie summarily shut down the construction of a new tunnel. At the time, he cited New Jersey's responsibility for the tunnel and any cost overruns, but the Government Accountability Office debunked both claims last week in a new report. A new effort, called Gateway Project, is now underway, but it is currently very preliminary.
    Regardless of whether the project was optimal for New Jersey, there were two clear short term benefits for Christie in cancelling the project: he was able to shine with the Republican Party by cutting spending. Cutting this project was a catalyst in his continued rising status in the Republican Party. New Jersey redirected the money set aside for the tunnel toward roads, allowing it to keep its second-lowest-in-the-nation gas tax.
    There's only one clear solution: If voters show themselves capable of punishing politicians for maximizing short-term benefits at the cost of avoiding beneficial long term investments. It is not a foregone conclusion that they cannot. Many of those voters take the train.

    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/signal/j...154026455.html

  4. #574

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mariab View Post
    There's only one clear solution: If voters show themselves capable of punishing politicians for maximizing short-term benefits at the cost of avoiding beneficial long term investments. It is not a foregone conclusion that they cannot.
    I wish it weren't a foregone conclusion, but most voters have very short memories.

Page 39 of 39 FirstFirst ... 293536373839

Similar Threads

  1. Hudson Yards
    By Kris in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 1905
    Last Post: June 7th, 2019, 05:20 PM
  2. Hudson River Park
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For New Yorkers
    Replies: 383
    Last Post: July 3rd, 2014, 05:21 PM
  3. Pier 57 - Hudson River Park
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For New Yorkers
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: December 17th, 2013, 04:00 PM
  4. Third Water Tunnel
    By NYguy in forum New York City Guide For New Yorkers
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: October 19th, 2013, 08:07 AM
  5. Pier 45 - Hudson River Park
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For New Yorkers
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: July 10th, 2012, 10:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software