Page 116 of 170 FirstFirst ... 1666106112113114115116117118119120126166 ... LastLast
Results 1,726 to 1,740 of 2547

Thread: New Penn Station (Moynihan Station)

  1. #1726
    Build the Tower Verre antinimby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in Limbo
    Posts
    8,508

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
    "This is probably the most important transportation hub in the country — there ought to be a federal contribution to it," the president of the Regional Plan Association, Robert Yaro, said.
    I totally agree.

    The damn Federal government thinks nothing of throwing tens of billions into that worthless Big Dig underground highway tunnel in Boston.

    600 million is just a drop in the bucket compared to that so they've got no excuse to not help with the Penn Station project, which by the way, is exactly what they should be condoning and supporting the development of because it is mass transit.

  2. #1727

    Default

    I also agree it should get federal moneys However.....
    worthless Big Dig underground highway tunnel in Boston.
    Nothing worthless about that project!

  3. #1728
    Build the Tower Verre antinimby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in Limbo
    Posts
    8,508

    Default

    Well it is worthless in the sense that there wasn't any utmost urgency in the need to move those roadways underground.

    Is it better for the Boston neighborhoods that they went underground? Yes but then that could be said for any arterial in any downtown area of most cities.

    Is it that urgent? No, and certainly not $16 BILLION (or however much more the end cost had ballooned to) urgent.

  4. #1729

    Default

    I can agree the cost ballooned to outrageous proportions BUT.....
    Having lived in Boston I can tell you it WAS needed!
    And it was alot more than just some downtown arterial
    Have you ever tried driving there?

  5. #1730
    Build the Tower Verre antinimby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in Limbo
    Posts
    8,508

    Default

    You don't seem to get it. Like I said, every city's highway system is a mess and everyone can reasonably claim that roadway improvement is needed but are they all urgently needed?

    I don't see how the Big Dig is any more urgent than say, the BQE-Gowanus in Brooklyn or the highway exchanges in Jersey City or any number of aging highways across the country.

    If we're going to throw $16 billion to bury highways running through every city, then how much money are we talking about here and is that money well spent?

  6. #1731

    Default

    I'm not going to quibble with you.....
    IMO
    Bostons was a unique problem that no other American city could claim..
    Read and learn - it was hurting more than Boston
    (where a lot of the trains that enter NYC come from)
    http://www.masspike.com/bigdig/background/index.html
    I will NOT change my mind and stand firm by my beliefs...
    and YES...I DO GET IT!
    Now back to the original topic

  7. #1732
    Build the Tower Verre antinimby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in Limbo
    Posts
    8,508

    Default

    Every city's problem is unique but that doesn't mean we should waste $16 billion of taxpayer's money at a so called problem that wasn't even that urgent.

    I'd say that bridge in Minneapolis was more urgent and should've gotten a piece of the funding that had gone to the Big Dig, which is really just a makeover.

  8. #1733

    Default

    I won't argue with you that the federal money should have probably gone elsewhere, but to say that the Big Dig was "just a makeover" is simply wrong.

    The old elevated highway was designed before federal standards were in place, back in a time when it was assumed that the more on- and off-ramps you had the better, regardless of what curves in the alignment existed (think the old West Side Highway, except not quite so antiquated). It was (relatively) unsafe, and needed at the very least a drastic redesign to get it anywhere near modern safety standards, let alone getting it up to a level where it could handle today's traffic demands.

    But yeah.. $15 billion and counting

  9. #1734
    Build the Tower Verre antinimby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in Limbo
    Posts
    8,508

    Default

    Well, I would certainly expect that at least some safety improvements would be made if you're going to spend $15 billion.

    I'm sorry but that isn't enough justification because I'm sure every city can make the same claim about roadway safety and I'm sure some might even be in poorer conditions than Boston but I don't see the Feds handing out $15 billion to everyone.

    Lastly, was there no other way to address those safety concerns in Boston other than through this ultra expensive route?

  10. #1735
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Downtown Brooklyn
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Maybe when New York gets a Tip O'Neil of it's own they'll be able to wrangle $15 Billion in federal funding for Penn Station. Until then I wouldn't count on it.

  11. #1736
    Build the Tower Verre antinimby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in Limbo
    Posts
    8,508

    Default

    Lol, so true. By the way, $15 billion would get us half-a-dozen new Penn Stations.

  12. #1737

    Default

    The bastards have lost their minds, its not enough that they are porking the city for $2b+ they want federal funding too. What a bunch of crooks, all to cash in on their land and property deals. These projects are hi-jacked by special interests and have very little merit at this point. It's obvious the train station is taking a back seat to getting these guys the carte blanch to do as they please with the area and air rights..

  13. #1738
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    2,636

    Default

    This wont get going till 2009 so no need to talk about it

  14. #1739
    Build the Tower Verre antinimby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in Limbo
    Posts
    8,508

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eugenious View Post
    The bastards have lost their minds, its not enough that they are porking the city for $2b+ they want federal funding too. What a bunch of crooks, all to cash in on their land and property deals. These projects are hi-jacked by special interests and have very little merit at this point. It's obvious the train station is taking a back seat to getting these guys the carte blanch to do as they please with the area and air rights..
    Oh god. I think I will stay quite clear of this one.

  15. #1740

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kliq6 View Post
    This wont get going till 2009 so no need to talk about it
    You are way too optimistic I say 2015

Similar Threads

  1. Reimagining A Hub - Jackson Heights Station
    By Kris in forum New York City Guide For New Yorkers
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: June 29th, 2009, 12:38 AM
  2. Progress of Temporary PATH Station in WTC 'Tub'
    By NYguy in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 172
    Last Post: August 29th, 2008, 02:50 AM
  3. Neon for the 59th Street Marine Transfer Station
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For Visitors
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 24th, 2005, 11:04 PM
  4. New Coney Island Train Station
    By BrooklynRider in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: July 22nd, 2005, 09:40 AM
  5. Station Renovation - East New York
    By Gulcrapek in forum New York City Guide For New Yorkers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: July 30th, 2004, 09:59 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Wired New York on Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup -

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software