Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Foster WTC Design

  1. #1

    Default Foster WTC Design

    There's a bit about how the Foster WTC design evolved in this article that I found interesting.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/featu...950561,00.html

    Here's the pertinent part..

    Architects who have worked with Kapoor say they find his methodology liberating; his thinking is uninhibited by practical considerations and he instead encourages them to think purely about form. Last year, Norman Foster asked Kapoor to help his team resolve the problems they were having with their entry for the World Trade Centre competition in New York.

    "They were struggling with it," Kapoor says. "Struggling with the biggest problem of that site, which is symbolic rather than formal. You can't avoid that on a site with that potential for resonance of memory and history. Norman very kindly asked me to come and look at it, so I went along and, as I'm sometimes prone to do, I kind of mouthed off."

    Kapoor says that the team had developed a novel structural solution - towers composed of huge, tessellated triangular frames - but the resulting forms failed to work as a piece of architecture on such a poignant site. Foster originally proposed three towers, but Kapoor suggested that there be just two. He then pushed the towers together so that they "kissed".

    In the event, Foster's design was beaten by Daniel Libeskind's Memory Foundations, which was loaded with symbolic references to the September 11 attack. While Libeskind emphasised this symbolism in his barnstorming presentation last December, Foster barely mentioned the symbolic "content" of his towers. "It's not Norman's style to play that up," says Kapoor. "And if a mistake was made it was to not understand - and I think this is increasingly true - that the great buildings, the great monuments, are ones that have intrinsic symbolic truth and value."

  2. #2
    Moderator NYatKNIGHT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Manhattan - South Village
    Posts
    4,240

    Default Foster WTC Design

    Norm didn't play up his towers enough, but who knew he really needed to? It seemed to me the symbolism was almost too obvious.

    You have to wonder what the plan with three towers looked like.

  3. #3

    Default Foster WTC Design

    One of the scarriest things I've ever seen, and it was just a picture !

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    297

    Default Foster WTC Design

    I still did love the towers he proposed for the site...

    There is no chance that those towers could ever make a comeback, right?

  5. #5
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Garden City, LI
    Posts
    1,778

    Default Foster WTC Design

    Would be nice on the East Side ConEd site! *Maybe on the West Side. *Even in DT Brooklyn or LIC to bring prominence to those areas.

Similar Threads

  1. Hearst Tower - 300 West 57th Street @ Eighth Avenue - by Norman Foster
    By NoyokA in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 815
    Last Post: June 12th, 2013, 04:52 PM
  2. Replies: 56
    Last Post: April 7th, 2007, 01:43 PM
  3. Design Competition for a 2012 Olympic Village
    By Kris in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: June 7th, 2005, 06:50 AM
  4. Ontario College of Art and Design
    By LF22 in forum World Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: May 24th, 2004, 02:17 PM
  5. Design Competition for Prototype of Green Buildings
    By Kris in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 24th, 2003, 07:24 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software