Page 6 of 968 FirstFirst ... 23456789101656106506 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 14513

Thread: WTC Tower One - by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill

  1. #76
    Moderator NYatKNIGHT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Manhattan - South Village
    Posts
    4,240

    Default

    Observation deck?

    Better glass, though.


  2. #77

    Default

    I need sometime to hypothesize a response. But from the looks of this rendering the building has atleast 80 floors! However no observation deck near 1776 feet.

  3. #78

    Default

    I think you're right. Look at this "a single mast above the spire may extend to 2,100 [feet]." I sure hope they dont mean a mast on the pole on the spire. Do they mean the pole spire or the building-like spire? Why does this have to be so confusing? Let's just build a supertall REAL 1776 footer!

    CALL UP CHILDS, THIS RENDERING SUCKS. I didn't want the spire to be open lattice-work. That's an awful replacement for the twin towers, IMO.

  4. #79

    Default

    WTF!!!! :evil: It hardly looks differant from the last rendering. Stern, is this REALLY Libeskind's new rendering, or just some rejected version stolen by the NY Post?


    Quote Originally Posted by Stern

  5. #80

    Default

    Pretty weak. Have you noticed that with each successive rendering, the details within the silhouette become increasingly drab? There is nothing interesting going on until a peak starts to form 2/3rds of the way up. And the spike looks decorative and insubstantional . It was an integral architectural element in Libeskind's original design.

  6. #81

    Default

    Hmm..I like this rendering...Nice and corporate-sqare floor plates with corner offices... And, didn't some editorialist call that goofy Leibeskind garden(spike) a Minarette, anyway?

  7. #82

    Default

    From asymmetrical to unbalanced...and boring.

    A comparison to a minaret is typical of the inflamatory nonesense published by the NY Post.

  8. #83

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TomAuch
    http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/9294.htm

    The new rendering by Libeskind - one of several he is said to be working with - differs from earlier versions in that he leaves out the slashing diagonal lines that crisscrossed the face of the building in previous images he has pasted onto the tower's surface the sort of standard glass and steel "curtain wall" fašade that can be found on many Midtown buildings.
    I'll wait until he comes up with something final and until I hear more details before I judge.

  9. #84

    Default

    Some details:

    Floors: 88
    Top of "building" section 1286 Feet
    Top of "enclosed" space in the spire 1410 Feet
    Top of "point" on spire 1776 Feet
    Top of Antenna 2000-2100 Feet

  10. #85
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    West Harlem
    Posts
    2,805

    Default

    The top of 'building' height is the only nice thing I see...

  11. #86

    Default



    This really just raises the bar for the memorial, which must be truly breathtaking.

  12. #87

    Default I'm too critical

    Libeskind is not the visionary architect designing for the public and for architectural posterity; he is an architect scared of losing his position with the big bad developer who holds all the cards, so he blands it down and tries to make it safe and familiar to the developer/tennants.

    Good solid blandness is what David Childs has in spades. If Libeskind tries to play by SOM's rules he will lose. Libeskind will only prevail if he is true to his vision- radical and visionary. He has got to make them come to him.

    I'll give him that those upper offices will be spectacular, provided they are not totally given to housing machinery.

  13. #88

    Default

    Real-estate is subject to market forces...in this mileu, form follows function. Childs creates a way in which Leibeskind's form *can* function.

  14. #89
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,298

    Default

    Wellllll...it's not THAT bad. The latticework spire could use some work, though.

  15. #90

    Default

    After two years, do you really think that this project is solely about market forces. If that were the case, there would have been no public input, no open design selection. Silverstein would have sat down with the PA and worked out a deal.

Similar Threads

  1. New 51-story tower Downtown
    By NYguy in forum New York Real Estate
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: January 17th, 2006, 09:20 PM
  2. Renderings CIBC Tower
    By NoyokA in forum New York Real Estate
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: July 19th, 2003, 07:17 PM
  3. 3 Buildings From 1830's Threatened By a Tower - Downtown
    By Kris in forum New York Real Estate
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: March 29th, 2003, 11:08 AM
  4. A Home Depot in the Bloomberg Tower?
    By NYguy in forum New York Real Estate
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: March 15th, 2003, 03:16 AM
  5. Special Issues for Merrill, the Landlord
    By Edward in forum New York Real Estate
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 23rd, 2002, 12:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software