No comma is necessary or even, in my view, appropriate. Imagine how the complete sentence would read with the missing words that are clearly implicit (IN CAPS):
"THIS BUILDING IS INTENDED to honor and remember those who lost their lives on September 11, 2001 and as a tribute to the enduring spirit of freedom."
The modern convention, as opposed to the rule I was taught in elementary school (to which the letter writer appears to still subscribe) is NOT to use a comma after a year unless it is otherwise required in the context of the sentence. Here it plainly is not. There are two descriptive phrases modifying the unstated, but implicit, opening words to the sentence (the phrase beginning with the word "to" and the phrase beginning with the word "as") connected with the word "and". Only a pair of sentence clauses (each containing both a subject and a verb), not mere phrases, need be separated by a comma. For example:
"THIS BUILDING IS INTENDED to honor and remember those who lost their lives on September 11, 2001, and IT IS FURTHER INTENDED as a tribute to the enduring spirit of freedom."



Reply With Quote




I would be very thankfull if i get some short and quick opinions reguarding what i had just posted.

Bookmarks