Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 42 of 42

Thread: LaGuardia Airport Demolition & Reconstruction Announced (2016-2021)

  1. #31
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BStyles View Post
    They said the same things about Howard Beach, and Jamaica Center.

    Also, you cannot squash a NIMBY. You can only pay them off. Otherwise Barclays Center would not have been built.
    The NIMBYs in Astoria are quite vocal and politically active. Vallone is probably in line to be mayor one day and the community there is very active in city matters. They have a lot of local power

  2. #32

    Default

    The MTA is a state agency. If Cuomo wanted to, he could push it through. In the end Astoria has only one of everything (City Councilcritter, Assemblycritter, State Senator, etc.). They can only generate som much political torque. If it were just the mayor, maybe not.

  3. #33
    Forum Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,099

    Default

    By the way, there is possibly a fatal flaw in the GCP subway extension idea, the elevated station/tracks at 82nd street would be right in the middle of the northbound airplane landing approach

  4. #34
    Forum Veteran TREPYE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    2,198

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GordonGecko View Post
    By the way, there is possibly a fatal flaw in the GCP subway extension idea, the elevated station/tracks at 82nd street would be right in the middle of the northbound airplane landing approach
    It would be fatal, but I don't think it is high enough to obstruct.... the bigger issue as to why it is better to do it from Willets Point is because even though it overshoots the airports the LIRR infrastructure is there to have a 1-2 stop [faster] train ride from Penn Station (or, eventually, GCT) to LGA; check it out:



    MTA used their noodle very effectively for once, I'm impressed!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	futurelirrmap.gif 
Views:	542 
Size:	19.6 KB 
ID:	18182  
    Last edited by TREPYE; August 6th, 2015 at 09:33 AM.

  5. #35

  6. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    west village
    Posts
    435

    Default

    there is one big positive aspect to building the airtrain from lga to willets pt. instead of the astoria subway stub - the next segment can eventually connect it to the jfk airtain. then not only do we have connections between the two airports, we have a quasi-triboro rx.

  7. #37
    NYC Aficionado from Oz Merry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,470

    Default

    Suggestion for Mods:

    Perhaps merge the Modernizing at LaGuardia: $1 billion makeover thread with this one?

  8. #38

    Default

    what mods?

  9. #39

    Default

    That is also another valid point. The LIRR connects directly (or at least it will) with Midtown, as well as with 7 train service, and eventual Broadway service. Connecting it at Astoria Boulevard doesn't give many transit incentives. Also, thanks to the pic above, it doesn't interfere with any of the runway approaches. This has win written all over it, and it brings tourists directly to a new retail neighborhood, and Citi Field.

  10. #40
    NYC Aficionado from Oz Merry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EastMillinocket View Post
    what mods?
    Yeah, I was thinking the same thing when I posted that.

  11. #41

    Default

    Have you been there recently? They are tearing down lots of buildings, and building a new parking garage exactly where the terminal is now supposed to go. It's a giant construction site. I would be curious as to how much has been sunk into the old "plan" which would be obsolete if the new "plan" were to be implemented.

  12. #42

    Default

    Newsday
    May 4, 2016

    Port Authority responds to your LaGuardia ideas

    By Anne Michaud and Amanda Fiscina


    A rendering of a view of the future LaGuardia Airport. The Queens airport's footprint would be moved 600 feet closer to the Grand Central Parkway, creating more space for aircraft taxiways and reducing the gate delays for which the facility is now famous. Ferry and rail service will also be built. Photo Credit: NY Governor's Office

    Dozens of readers accepted our invitation to name the one change that would fix the dreadful experience known as LaGuardia Airport. Here are your top questions, along with answers from the Port Authority aviation team planning the airport's $4 billion overhaul who met with the editorial board Tuesday.

    Readers: We need a smoother flow of traffic. You can't read signs while doing 90-degree turns in heavy traffic.
    Port Authority: Signage is the subject of two meetings a week. It’s one of our biggest challenges. We are limited because the signs can’t appear too early on the Grand Central Parkway, according to Parks Commission rules. Signage will be critical, especially during construction. When we’re done, we hope that the terminals will be more logically laid out. Even beyond signage, there are millions budgeted for improved traffic management.

    Readers: Give us a water taxi, subway and LIRR connections.
    Port Authority: AirTrain service is looking very positive, but it will depend on the cost and potential ridership. We’re studying those now. The AirTrain would stop at the terminals and connect near CitiField to the No. 7 subway line and the LIRR. We’re also looking into a marine terminal for ferry service, but there may be an issue with the wakes. We’re looking at that, as well.

    Readers: Drop-off and pick-up is a nightmare! Will there be any effort to ease congestion and facilitate the movement of vehicles?
    Port Authority: It’s going to be much better. We’re creating three levels to replace the single level everyone uses now for arrivals and departures. One level will be dedicated to arrivals, and one to departures. The lowest level will serve high-occupancy vehicles like shuttle buses.

    Readers: Will you accommodate ride-sharing like Uber?
    Port Authority: There’s already a lot near the marine terminal that Uber drivers can use. It opened last summer. The lot has geofencing technology, so only the drivers in the lot are pinged. The new plan will provide for this, too.

    Readers: Re-lay out security for more inspection stations and more room to move off the belt and get reorganized. Also better connectivity (moving walkways, a small internal shuttle) between terminals.
    Port Authority: Security will double from the current 30,000 square feet in four screening areas to 60,000 square feet in one central area. There will be moving walkways.

    Copyright © 2016 Newsday. All rights reserved.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software