Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 55 of 55

Thread: Sears Tower a.k.a. Willis Tower - Chicago - by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill

  1. #46
    Crabby airline hostess - stache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Nairobi Hilton
    Posts
    8,511

    Thumbs up

    Agreed.

  2. #47
    King Omega XVI OmegaNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Clifton, NJ
    Posts
    1,442

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by meh_cd
    Everything about the John Hancock building is better.
    Like?

  3. #48
    Senior Member Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Posts
    926

    Default

    They can run rings around the moon, but we're miles ahead of 'em on the highway. The Sears Tower will always be the Sears Tower, and the Pan Am Building will always be the Pan Am Building.

  4. #49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OmegaNYC View Post
    Like?
    Architecture, observatory, restaurant/bar, security is lax in comparison. Makes the entire experience more enjoyable. That being said, when I was in the Sears Tower in May while they were putting the ledge in there was *no* security, but I did get yelled at for taking a picture of the lobby. Just think of what I could do with that picture!

    Before I visited Chicago I liked Sears, but now that I've actually seen it in person I think it's just a hulking mess from most angles. Only thing going for it is height.

    I'll take those diagonal cross braces on Hancock anyday.

  5. #50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by meh_cd View Post
    Everything about the John Hancock building is better.
    Not if you're an English banker taking your family from the Carribean or London to Chicago. Only at Willis Tower can you boast about it all being British.

    Those observation decks make it look like a carnival ride - a cheap stunt there for the people who take cheap flights to get cheap electronics before returning home. Surely the view from the observation deck was outstanding enough.

    Who's idea was that?

  6. #51

    Default

    I was in downtown last weekend, and I see that people have already begun defacing the Willis Tower signage along Wacker Drive. It's rather amusing to be honest. I guess even with the obvious vandalism, they still don't get the clue that people are upset.

    Then again the fact anybody can literally peel the letters off of a prominent marker in front of the nation's tallest building says a lot about the quality of Willis as a company.

    --Randall

  7. #52
    NYC Aficionado from Oz Merry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,476

    Default

    Suspended In Space, 103 Stories Over Chicago

    By EDWARD ROTHSTEIN







    CHICAGO — The view looking down through the glass floor toward South Wacker Drive is just what you’d expect if you were balanced on top of 6,960 boxes of this city’s deep-dish pizza — or, as the exhibition at the Willis Tower also tells us, standing atop 313 Oprah Winfreys or 283 Barack Obamas.

    That thought brings on its own sort of vertigo. The comfort is that those human towers would reach the top of the building itself, while this particular perch for a human version of Yertle the Turtle is a bit lower, on the 103rd floor: fewer pizzas, media stars and presidents would be required.

    Not much help. Stand on the Ledge, as it is called, on the tower’s Skydeck, and look down on rooftops and traffic helicopters, and leftward toward the haze over the lake, and outward along the city’s grid stretching toward the South Side. Despite the reassuring rivets in the 1,500-pound glass panels, the calm stillness of the air at the Windy City’s pinnacle and the security of a 10,000-pound weight capacity for each of the four 4.3-foot-deep glass boxes that protrude past the sheer edge of the Western Hemisphere’s tallest building — despite all that, you still feel twinges of queasiness.

    If the Deity had wanted us to see straight down as far as we can see straight up, he would certainly not have come up with these glass extensions, which were added to the Skydeck in 2009. It is comforting to know that they were designed by the building’s original architects, Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, and mounted on tracks that allow them to be pulled inside for cleaning and maintenance. But any reassurance is undercut by the elimination of nearly all visible support; you walk within them, 1,353 feet above South Wacker Drive, surrounded by open air and unbounded space.

    It’s a weird sensation. The structural use of steel made the Chicago skyscraper and its epigones possible at the turn of the 20th century. Later glass-clad frames seem to almost magically dissolve the signs of massive support that we expect when confronted with buildings of such height. But the playful formality of the glass skyscraper is very different when you stand within a transparent structure in which there is no structural steel evident, either above or below. Here wit turns to mischief; it’s a tease made by technology.

    But there’s also an exhilaration that you don’t get if you visit a distant relative of the Ledge: the Grand Canyon Skywalk. That attraction opened two years before these Chicago extensions and promised to be far more spectacular: a transparent-floored observation deck stretching outward 70 feet from the canyon’s rim and suspended 4,000 feet above the Colorado River (as high as 900 Oprahs and an impossible number of deep-dish pizzas).

    It was built on land owned by the Hualapai Indians, who had great hopes that, along with bellicose helicopter rides into the canyon and quaint displays of folk culture, the Skywalk would guarantee the tribe a rosy economic future. I visited the Skywalk soon after its opening and was astounded not at seeing Nature’s expansive dimensions open at my feet, but at the sheer irrelevance of the enterprise. The expense, hype and setting couldn’t match Nature’s own spectacle at the main part of the canyon, run by the National Park Service — an immensity that makes all human enterprise seem like petty gimcrackery.

    The Skywalk has recently come under the shadow of various legal squabbles between the tribe and the developer, but there also may be something inherently flawed in the concept. It might be that apart from such unusual activities as a space walk or a sky dive the natural world presents itself to us with as much power when seen horizontally as vertically. We don’t need vertigo to get the point.

    But with the Ledge something is sensed that you can’t really get from walking around the Skydeck with its panoramic vistas of Chicago and its labeled guides to landmarks. I don’t recall that sensation from the observation deck of the old World Trade Center years ago either. When you look out through a window at the metropolis laid out before you, the city becomes a map, allowing you to make some sense of its immensity; this is the way pilots must feel as they guide their planes into urban airports. Window vistas on the world are beautiful but not powerfully unsettling or overwhelming. They help make sense of the world, not disrupt it.

    Pull the rug out, though — or rather, pull out the solid floor, all suggestions of support, and stand on layers of glass — and something else happens. You become a vulnerable observer. You look at the city and its expanse, but you can’t settle into complacency or reflective mapping. You end up feeling, along with the amazement, an all-too-human unsteadiness. You are part of that city of course, and are even relying on its technological achievements by standing in this elevated spot. But you also recognize just how unusual and vulnerable those advances are. The city might attempt to transcend the human, but it also readily reflects it. Spend a minute on the glass Ledge, and you feel that in your bones.

    In fact when you visit the Ledge (which 1.5 million visitors do every year), you also find yourself in a series of exhibitions celebrating the city itself. We learn about the entertainers born in or closely connected to Chicagoland (as it is cutely called): Raquel Welch , Harrison Ford, Walt Disney, Hugh Hefner. Or about political figures: Hillary Rodham Clinton, Donald H. Rumsfeld, Ronald Reagan, the Rev. Jesse Jackson. Or writers: Ernest Hemingway, L. Frank Baum, David Mamet (with Saul Bellow strangely omitted). Or musicians: Muddy Waters, Benny Goodman, Louis Armstrong. There is George Ferris, who invented his amusement-park ride for the 1893 World’s Fair here, and department-store magnates like Marshall Field and A. Montgomery Ward. O’Hare Airport, we learn, was once called Orchard Place, which is why the initials for Chicago’s major hub are still ORD.

    We learn that this very tower was conceived in 1969 when Sears Roebuck & Company was the largest retailer in the world, with about 350,000 employees. Once known as the Sears Tower, the building is celebrated in statistics that appear throughout the displays: it contains 25,000 miles of electrical cable, 43,000 miles of telephone cables, 16,100 windows, 2 billion cubic feet of concrete, 104 elevator cars. It remained the Sears Tower until 2009, long after the company had sold it and moved out; it was renamed after the Willis Group, a London-based insurance broker, leased part of the building and obtained naming rights.

    Now it is a monument to Chicago’s great retailing past and a witness to its passing. But when you stand on the Ledge, the entire urban fabric seems both marvelously permanent and permeated with vulnerabilities, an imposing achievement and a transitory exercise. Do you want to sense both the power and fragility of human civilization? Walk on the Ledge.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/31/ar...imes&seid=auto

  8. #53

    Default

    I think they're both interesting towers. But I don't like the fact that they are both dark buildings. It's kind of odd that the two tallest are both dark in color. They don't pop on a daylight skyline like a light colored building. I hate the steel cross members of the Hancock but like it's pinnacle shape. I also like the fact that the Sears tower isn't one big square like the WTC towers but is broken up. Overall though, there are much better and more beautiful examples of towers throughout the world.

  9. #54

    Default

    Holy smokes! That glass floor would turn my legs to jello!

  10. #55

    Default

    Hancock in beautiful, simple, yet seeming somewhat complex at the same time. It's a tower that gets slimmer as it rises and has a beautiful skeletal structure. Sears Tower/Willis Tower, is quite different. It is a conglomeration of nine buildings, each rising to a separate height, It appears different from every view. It is a chameleon on the skyline that was, regardless of the Petronas Towers, really the world's tallest until Taipei 101 surpassed it. Off subject: The Chicago Spire would be a great addition to fill in the gap between the Sears Tower and the Hancock Tower. Although Trump is officially second tallest, it cheats by use of a spire a la Petronas.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: April 26th, 2011, 05:09 AM
  2. Renderings CIBC Tower
    By NoyokA in forum New York Real Estate
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: July 19th, 2003, 08:17 PM
  3. 3 Buildings From 1830's Threatened By a Tower - Downtown
    By Kris in forum New York Real Estate
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: March 29th, 2003, 12:08 PM
  4. A Home Depot in the Bloomberg Tower?
    By NYguy in forum New York Real Estate
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: March 15th, 2003, 04:16 AM
  5. Special Issues for Merrill, the Landlord
    By Edward in forum New York Real Estate
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 23rd, 2002, 01:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software