Page 5 of 13 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 186

Thread: United States Mission to U.N. - 1st Ave @ West 45th - by Gwathmey Siegel & Associates

  1. #61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by londonlawyer View Post
    I agree.

    Also, a country that's so hated that it requires a fortress for a consulate should really re-think its foreign policy.
    On its own soil at that. Maybe they fear at attack by New Yorkers? Or Spider-Man? Who knows?

    2 UN is great and this whole thing is just architectural murder.

  2. #62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jake View Post
    Maybe they fear at attack by New Yorkers? Or Spider-Man?
    Neither of the above.

    (Not like it hasn't already happened, Jake.)

  3. #63

    Default

    A lecture on this kind of building project is forthcoming.

    http://www.archleague.org/index-dynamic.php?show=668

    Or if you just want to throw eggs at David Childs.

  4. #64
    Forum Veteran MidtownGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    East Midtown
    Posts
    6,832

    Default

    investordude:
    To be honest, I don't see what the security features of this building are that make you think it is somehow a manifestation of fear.
    http://www.cohensfashionoptical.com/

    They're running a special this month.

  5. #65

    Default it is pretty ugly

    I have to confess this building looks like it will turn out to be pretty ugly.

  6. #66

  7. #67
    Kings County Loyal BrooklynLove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn, planet Earth
    Posts
    2,757

    Default

    this place is screaming for a neon verizon sign

  8. #68
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    219

    Default

    Keep all the cranes on and never take them off or stick one on the top. That way no one will know its a completed building and pass it off as a skyscraper core.

  9. #69
    Random Personality
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Woodside, Queens
    Posts
    950

    Default What they could have done

    They could have put fake windows with a concrete wall behind it. At least that way it would be more human.

  10. #70

    Default

    They should have built a, underground bunker instead of the skyscraper equivalent of NORAD.

  11. #71

    Default All your safety are belong to us!1

    The scary thing is that it will seem extraordinarily prescient if freedom and democracy hating terrorists ever bomb the place. It's like they're planning for an inevitable Reichstag fire. With this kind of preparation, don't be surprised by the stormtroopers.



    Come to think of it, maybe this lookout tower needs some Banksy sprucing up.

  12. #72
    10 Barclay = Decepticon Optimus Prime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Isle of Manna-hata
    Posts
    284

    Default

    Good thing the government didn't have this mentality in the 18th, 19th, and for most of the 20th centuries. Imagine, if you will, the U.S. Capitol if it were built today.

  13. #73

    Default

    When you have a republic with the power vested in the people, open communal public architecture is the norm. When you have secretive cloistered power, rulers, masters, and oppressors of the people you have fortresses.

    Interesting to note that during the past centuries, guns, gunpowder, cannons, dynamite, swords, daggers and the like were far more prevalent and easily acquired than they are today -- and yet the architecture was deferential to the rights of the individual citizen.

    The civic attitude has been replaced by a corporate attitude. Government Corp. owns all the property and administers it with it's employees, directors, shareholders etc. It can even be seen creeping into the language. Peace officers and public servants have become law enforcement and the authorities - and if we're not on the payroll of Gov. Corp. then we're merely civilians.

    I can only hope that this monstrous and offensive building is in some way a snide commentary, a bit of architectural satire that exaggerates out of all proportion to illustrate its absurdity. I fear though, this is the frankenstein creation of an out of control security bureaucracy driven by fear, suspicion and distrust of a free and open society.

    God help us.
    Last edited by Jasonik; March 3rd, 2008 at 03:42 PM. Reason: prayer

  14. #74
    Build the Tower Verre antinimby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    in Limbo
    Posts
    8,976

    Default

    Watch, thirty years from now, when the Feds announce their intention to sell this building (and the site) off to a developer to build a condo tower, the Eastsiders will try to petition to get this landmarked because of its "historical significance" in epitomizing and the architectural response to the fears of the post 9/11 era.

    I can totally see that happening.

    So it's conceivable that what you are looking at is the making of a future landmark.

  15. #75

    Default

    I think this building is a joke.

    I think it's a noble effort to build the mission a new building because the US should really acknowledge the fact that those people do more for America's soft power than all the weapons deals and aid going to questionable destinations.

    However, the idea of putting something as openly militaristic across the street from the entrance to the UN (and in fact yards away from where many diplomats stay) does NOTHING for us other than make us appear like the imperialistic hegemon that all the maniacs make us out to be.

    I don't know who has ultimate authority over these decisions but as I am at the UN quite a bit I'll tell you that the US will never reach the reputation of Canada or the Scandinavian countries because those missions give a little bit of money to improve the UN building and it really goes a long way.

    This building simply stands against everything that diplomacy is and will forever be a poignant reminder of everything that the US should not want to appear to be.

    Diplomats and staff at the UN are neither impressed, nor scared of this kind of bullshit which is why I find this design at least redundant and at most highly counterproductive.

    It doesn't even have anything to make the work of US staff easier as it obviously lacks both views and spacious floors.

    I agree with antinimby that this will surely be a landmark. The only use I can think of is to turn the roof turret into some kind of astronomical observatory.

Page 5 of 13 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. InterActiveCorp HQ - 555 West 18th Street @ West Street - by Frank Gehry
    By tmg in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 572
    Last Post: May 7th, 2016, 01:38 AM
  2. Trump World Tower - 845 United Nations Plaza - Condo - by Costas Kondylis
    By emmeka in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 118
    Last Post: June 16th, 2014, 03:43 PM
  3. Perry West - 173/176 Perry Street @ West Street - by Richard Meier
    By Edward in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: December 26th, 2010, 09:52 AM
  4. Citigroup Center - 153 East 53rd Street - by Stubbins Associates / Emery Roth & Sons
    By emmeka in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: October 17th, 2010, 12:41 AM
  5. The view from 45th floor of Crowne Plaza Hotel
    By noharmony in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 18th, 2001, 05:12 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software