Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: Jane Jacobs' Neighborhood

  1. #31
    Disgruntled Optimist lofter1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    NYC - Downtown
    Posts
    32,654

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ablarc View Post

    I'm still trying to get over the closing of Cafe Figaro ... and it's been years.
    A chain joint has opened there: Qdoba Mexican Cafe

    http://lostnewyorkcity.blogspot.com/...garo-cafe.html

    Terrible interior, like a cross between McD's and 7-Eleven.

    And really bad plastic signage out front.

  2. #32

    Cool West 10th

    Sleeping on the couch isn't so bad when you wake up to...



    Is anything more precious (or urbane) than this?


  3. #33
    NYC Aficionado from Oz Merry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,476

    Default

    An Urban Theorist Questions the Gospel of St. Jane

    By MICHAEL POWELL

    Sharon Zukin has a thought or five about what has become of New York City, and her verdict is not great news if you are a lover of cities, and of this one in particular.

    Ms. Zukin, a Brooklyn College sociology professor and for many decades a resident of Greenwich Village, sees a city gradually hollowed out, its grand old working-class buildings preserved in gilded amber even as the working-class people who gave those buildings meaning have been pushed out.

    Ms. Zukin, in her new book, “Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places,” also casts a cool eye on the legacy of Jane Jacobs, the great urbanist who 50 years ago saw in the West Village a ideal vision for the future of the cities. (The title of Ms. Zukin’s book is a sly play on Ms. Jacobs’ 1961 masterwork, “The Death and Life of Great American Cities.”)

    Ms. Zukin, the subject of an article in this weekend’s Metropolitan section, will be speaking on the destructive scramble for authenticity at a panel on Monday (see below).

    Ms. Jacobs famously celebrated an “urban village” where the working-class tailor and the artist, the Italian grocer and the drunken playwright could live cheek by jowl. Today, Ms. Zukin notes, the urban village’s delightfully varied housing stock remains, but the blue-collar denizens long since have decamped, pushed out by oppressively high rents and a shared upper-class aesthetic that prizes buildings over people.

    And her lament extends well beyond the West Village.

    “The East Village still enjoys the image of an oasis of authenticity in a Wal-Mart wasteland,” she notes in her book, “which tends to make living here even more expensive.”

    Brownstone Brooklyn is another slide placed under her cultural microscope.

    The bohemian outliers of the upper-middle-class wave that has swept the area celebrated the “grittiness” of the neighborhoods, she notes, even as they pushed the working class toward the exits.

    “It’s a myth that, like Jane Jacobs’s sanitized appreciation of the urban village of Hudson Street, lured more artists and writers to Brooklyn as those ethnic communities aged and grew smaller,” Ms. Zukin writes.

    This new gentrification, fast and powerful and pervasive, is difficult to derail, backed as it is by vast gobs of bank capital and the retailing of the city’s haute real estate firms.

    All will be the subject of a discussion Monday night from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. at the CUNY Graduate Center, 365 Fifth Avenue at 34th Street, where Ms. Zukin, Samuel Zipp of Brown University, Thomas Angotti of CUNY-Hunter College, and Clara Irazábal of Columbia University will examine how the idea of “authenticity” has played a central role in making regions of the city more exclusive.

    The forum is sponsored by the Gotham Center for New York City History. All online reservations have been claimed, but standby seats may be available.

    http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/20...e/#more-136585

  4. #34
    NYC Aficionado from Oz Merry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,476

    Default

    Jane Jacobs and the Power of Women Planners

    Roberta Brandes Gratz


    WIkimedia Commons
    Fifty years ago this month, Jane Jacobs published Death and Life of Great American Cities and changed the way the world understands cities. Yet even when she's acknowledged as an important urban thinker, the 'housewife' qualifier is invariably included. When we talk about strategies for city growth and economic development, women aren't often offered seats at the table.

    They hold jobs in the field but few posts as critics. Jane was the exception. But the rules didn’t change a great deal. Jacobs broke into the national discussion about cities somewhat by accident. She was a reluctant stand-in for her Architectural Forum male editor at a cities conference in 1956. She had written some insightful articles about how cities work, particularly in Vogue, documenting how New York City’s fur and flower districts evolved organically.

    Today, her early observations are considered pathbreaking. But happenstance thrust her into the public eye.

    Jacobs’ early attention-getting articles in Architectural Forum and Fortune Magazine happened because she had as a champion a distinguished male editor William Holly Whyte. Whyte gained fame for writing The Organization Man and for espousing ideas similar to hers. But he had to overcome a sputtering, angry Fortune publisher who once asked, “Who is this crazy dame?”

    A housewife without even a college degree was unacceptable. After all, Lewis Mumford’s scathing review of Death and Life was headlined “Mother Jacobs Home Remedies.”

    Pondering why men and women’s voices were heard differently on the subject of city building, she noted matter-of-factly that women think about things close to home—street, neighborhood and community. They more easily recognize the big difference small things can make. Men think big, national and global. They are top-down oriented.

    This contrast was played out in a very public way when developer James Rouse and Jane Jacobs appeared together in 1980 at the Boston Great Cities Conference. Their subject was the question of whether cities should be developed with big plans and inspiring visions or modest steps and incremental change.

    Rouse spoke first, recalling the words of Daniel Burnham, "Make no little plans, for they have no magic to stir men’s blood," he said.

    Jacobs followed and began, "Funny, big plans never stirred women’s blood. Women have always been willing to consider little plans."

    The applause was deafening.

    Rouse argued that big plans could give the world exciting new communities. Jacobs said big plans lead to big mistakes and stifle imagination and alternatives. Rouse claimed big plans avoid wasteful haphazard piecemeal development. Jacobs saw big plans as routinizers, formulas, smootherers.

    This was 1980. Jacobs had long before helped defeat Robert Moses on three city-changing projects. Her efforts accelerated his demise. She was world-famous for several books. But she didn’t for one moment think that what she had to say was heard with the same impact as it would have been if her words were spoken by men.

    Too many people today claim they plan according to Jacobs' precepts while embracing Robert Moses’ pursuit of big, bold visions. Jacobs, of course, thought big too, but in a different way from Moses – not big demolition and car-based projects but big physical and social infrastructure like mass transit and library systems or big urban networks of smaller components like interconnected neighborhoods.

    In the 1993 introduction to the Modern Library edition of Death and Life, Jane questioned the widespread claim that her book changed the urban development field. Interestingly, she divided the world into foot people and car people. For foot people, she agreed, the book gave "legitimacy to what they already knew but whom the experts of the day deemed old fashioned and stopping progress."

    She wrote:

    It is not easy for uncredentialed people to stand up to the credentialed, even when the so-called expertise is grounded in ignorance and folly. This book turned out to be helpful ammunition against such experts. But it is less accurate to call this effect 'influence' than to see it as corroboration and collaboration. Conversely, the book neither collaborated with car people nor had influence on them. It still does not, as far as I can see.


    The subtext here and found in other ways in Jacobs' work and words goes back to her Rouse exchange and the difference in thinking between men and women. We talked about this over the years. She loved the stories I would bring her as I crisscrossed the country for research on my own books, stories of regenerating neighborhoods and whole cities where the catalysts were invariably small neighborhood-based projects most often initiated by women.

    Today, those women are everywhere. In New York, Mindy Fullilove. Alexie Torres Flemming. Majora Carter. Kate Wood. Elizabeth Yampiere. Joan Byron. In New Orleans, Tanya Harris, Karen Gadbois, Carol Bebelle. They are activists like Jacobs was. It is one thing to dwell in the world of ideas, another to actively engage in the transformations we need in our world today. Any dogged observer of American cities of the 20th and 21st centuries can’t escape the discovery that women have been in the forefront of saving and regenerating American cities.
    Jane Jacobs was just one of them.

    http://www.theatlanticcities.com/art...-planners/502/

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Greenpoint - Brooklyn's neighborhood
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For Visitors
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: July 23rd, 2012, 12:35 PM
  2. DUMBO - Neighborhood on Brooklyn waterfront
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For Visitors
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: September 26th, 2010, 02:53 PM
  3. Hotel Gansevoort
    By Edward in forum New York City Guide For Visitors
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: January 20th, 2006, 10:21 PM
  4. Your Neighborhood Highway
    By Kris in forum News and Politics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: November 12th, 2003, 11:27 AM
  5. Fade to Black - Neighborhood movie theaters
    By Kris in forum New York City Guide For New Yorkers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: August 5th, 2003, 12:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software