Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20

Thread: Manchester's 171m Beetham tops out (tallest residential in EU)

  1. #16

    Default

    Brighton's one of those places that shouldn't have high-rises. Ruins the atmosphere. Your aerial makes my point, nick.

  2. #17

    Default

    Brighton already has highrises though. Sussex Heights at 102m was until the Manchester Beetham topped out this year, the tallest residential tower outside of London!

    102m - Sussex Heights





    I think any urban environment other than trully historic cores like Bath, York, Durham, etc... can have highrises, they just need to be located carefully. The annoying thing with Sussex Heights is that its right in the core, practically a stones throw from the historic core. Infact the older highrises are closer to the core than the new towers which are further from the core as my following map illustrates. Essentially the two tallest towers will roughly act as markers for the ends of Brighton on the sea front - about 5miles.



  3. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nick-taylor
    Brighton already has highrises though.
    Atmosphere already ruined.

    Maine-Montparnasse Tower does that to Paris. Fortunately, a horrified Paris said, "No more! The others will be in the outskirts." So, though the damage was not undone, it's also not aggravated.

  4. #19

    Default

    Although the towers are tall and noticable, you wouldn't know about them unless you walk along the streets surrounding them. Its not like NYC, where some blocks blot out everything around. These new towers themselves are away from the city centre for the simple reason that they would never see the light of day.

    I personally can't wait until the Brighton Marina Tower goes up - thats going to be quite good as it rises from what is currently just a sea wall protecting the marina from the English Channel - a sort of lighthouse.

  5. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noone
    Oh no,it isn't.Turning Torso in Malmo, Sweden for example is 190 m and what's that thing on the roof ? Don't you think that's cheating?
    TT is mixed use tho.../the lowest cubes are offices.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. East 57th Street Tops Retail List Highest Rents In the World
    By noharmony in forum New York Real Estate
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: January 30th, 2008, 12:33 PM
  2. Brooklyn proposal, borough's tallest
    By NYguy in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 228
    Last Post: March 5th, 2007, 08:35 PM
  3. Poll finds New Yorkers are wary of world's tallest building
    By JMGarcia in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: May 12th, 2003, 06:22 PM
  4. 139 E. 34th Street - Building type, residential?
    By dvinfo in forum New York Real Estate
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 1st, 2003, 11:34 AM
  5. 12 Metrotech Center tops out - Where have I been?
    By Gulcrapek in forum New York Skyscrapers and Architecture
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: October 21st, 2002, 04:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Google+ - Facebook - Twitter - Meetup

Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software