Go Back   Wired New York Forum > Skyscrapers and Architecture > New York Skyscrapers and Architecture

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 13th, 2005, 10:20 AM
kliq6 kliq6 is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 2,662
Default Proposed: Shangri-La Hotel, New York - 610 Lexington Ave - by Norman Foster

ROSEN BUYS Y SITE FOR CONDOS

January 13, 2005 -- Aby Rosen and Michael Fuchs are buying the YWCA site at 610 Lexington Ave. for $31.5 million, The Post has learned.
Sources say the duo intends to build a sky-high skyscraper of at least 50-stories that will likely become some kind of residential condominium with perhaps a hotel component.

Rosen could not be reached for comment but his company, RFR Holdings, became the likely buyers, as their Seagram Building shares the block.

Along with unused air rights from Seagram at 375 Park Ave., they can also transfer development rights across Park Ave. from their landmarked Lever House.

Additionally, they purchased other air rights from the London & Leeds developed Manhattan Tower at 101 E. 52nd St. also on the block due south of the Y.

The 1915 building is not landmarked and sits on a plot of nearly 10,000 square feet.

There is no height limitation on Park Avenue. The building is diagonally across the street from the Citigroup Center, which rises 915 feet to 59 stories.


The Y is holding a press conference this morning to announce its closing schedule and a special deal for members with a health club.

The YWCA offices will likely move to one of the United Federation of Teachers buildings at 50-52 Broadway, where it can continue to serve women, sources said.

Cushman & Wakefield's capital-markets team, led by Charles Kingsley, handled the sale.

The firm was preparing to help sell the property and relocate the Y in 2001 before Sept. 11. C&W declined comment.

"The Y has always been a challenge," said David Lebenstein of Time Equities who, with a partner, completed a similar deal for the McBurney YMCA.

That Y moved from 23rd Street to a new building on 14th Street.

"It is not because the real estate isn't extremely valuable," said Lebenstein, "but because relocating them to an affordable site with a gym, pool and other amenities is extremely expensive and difficult in Manhattan when you are competing with all these crazy residential deals."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 13th, 2005, 11:30 AM
krulltime's Avatar
krulltime krulltime is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manhattan - UWS
Posts: 4,219
Default

Interesting news... This is going to be a big tower by the looks of those air rights on Park Ave.

Funny I dont remember what the YWCA building looks like... I will have to go there to see it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 13th, 2005, 11:42 AM
londonlawyer's Avatar
londonlawyer londonlawyer is offline
Que sabor deliciosa!
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,530
Default

I'm disappointed. It's nice to see a new tower, especially in that area which has a lot of junk. The Y is a decent building, however, and it would have been so much nicer if some of the really horrible, low-rise structures in that area had been the development site. With luck, this project will precipitate other construction within those horrible blocks on Lex.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 13th, 2005, 12:48 PM
Just Rich Just Rich is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 127
Default

Image showing the site.
It's already a very dense area.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 13th, 2005, 02:05 PM
billyblancoNYC billyblancoNYC is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Garden City, LI
Posts: 1,778
Default

This could be the 1 NY Plaza that didn't happen! I think this is the same developer. Res plus hotel plus a couple floors of retail. C'mon, it could happen.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 13th, 2005, 03:26 PM
Kolbster's Avatar
Kolbster Kolbster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 336
Default

Height predictions anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 13th, 2005, 03:28 PM
Eugenius's Avatar
Eugenius Eugenius is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Midtown Manhattan
Posts: 516
Default

There has to be a huge amount of available air rights associated with the Lever House, since it only fills in 1/3 of its potential building envelope.

Plus, if the building is largely residential, that would encourage an increase in height. The highest apartments go at a premium. I am very excited.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 13th, 2005, 03:57 PM
NoyokA's Avatar
NoyokA NoyokA is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,279
Default

Quote:
This could be the 1 NY Plaza that didn't happen! I think this is the same developer. Res plus hotel plus a couple floors of retail. C'mon, it could happen.
It could happen. The developer is buying alot of air-rights, I did not know soo much existed at Seagram and Manhattan Tower. I do know that there is enough air-rights at Lever House alone, in theory, to permit a 100 storey building on this site.

According to Goldberg's book, On The Rise, at one time the Fisher brothers planned to demolish Lever and replace it with a 40 storey storey skyscraper on its site. Park Tower Realty who built Park Avenue tower nearby wanted to transfer air-rights and build a larger skyscraper there. Another design proposal opted to tear down Lever House and replace it with a 60 storey skyscraper.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old January 13th, 2005, 04:03 PM
NoyokA's Avatar
NoyokA NoyokA is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,279
Default

Rich can you teleport your design proposal from a couple years back to this site, and maybe too send it to the developer.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old January 13th, 2005, 04:41 PM
Deimos Deimos is offline
Architectural Padawan
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Turtle Bay
Posts: 311
Default

Let's keep in mind that this site is tiny. The footprint can't be much bigger than the millenium hilton downtown, so i think that any tower over 50 stories will look odd at best. We probably could get a 6-700 footer out of this construction however.. just nothing over the height of Citigroup.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old January 13th, 2005, 05:05 PM
Just Rich Just Rich is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 127
Default

Stern, are you talking about this thing?

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old January 13th, 2005, 05:13 PM
Deimos Deimos is offline
Architectural Padawan
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Turtle Bay
Posts: 311
Default

wow :shock: :shock: that is impressive looking! It's located 2 blocks too far north however in that picture.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Rich
Stern, are you talking about this thing?

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old January 13th, 2005, 06:03 PM
NoyokA's Avatar
NoyokA NoyokA is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,279
Default

Quote:
Stern, are you talking about this thing?
Yes.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old January 16th, 2005, 11:07 AM
Alonzo-ny's Avatar
Alonzo-ny Alonzo-ny is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 5,277
Default

That would be amazing for the skyline!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old January 16th, 2005, 05:42 PM
PHLguy PHLguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Phila / Connecticut
Posts: 521
Default

If this is only 50 floors it cant be much bigger than city, BOA has 57 floors and is 945 feet, a 50 floor tower would be about as big as citicorp if it was office but more in the 600 range for residential, why all the excitment?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
610 lexington avenue, hotels, lexington avenue, norman foster, shangri-la

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
200 Greenwich Street - Proposed WTC Tower #2 - by Norman Foster JMGarcia New York Skyscrapers and Architecture 908 November 10th, 2009 03:34 PM
‘Temporary’ but Still Standing on Lexington Avenue Kris New York Skyscrapers and Architecture 1 July 29th, 2006 09:45 AM
450 Lexington Avenue - by Warren & Wetmore / Tower by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Law & Order New York Skyscrapers and Architecture 10 October 7th, 2005 03:57 PM
599 Lexington Avenue emmeka New York Skyscrapers and Architecture 19 November 11th, 2003 02:40 PM
Central Synagogue - 652 Lexington Avenue Edward New York City Guide For Visitors 4 February 21st, 2003 11:49 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 PM.




Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.