Go Back   Wired New York Forum > Skyscrapers and Architecture > New York Real Estate

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 26th, 2005, 09:33 PM
krulltime's Avatar
krulltime krulltime is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manhattan - UWS
Posts: 4,219
Default 2628 & 2633 Broadway: Ariel West - by Cook + Fox | Ariel East - by Cetra/Ruddy

I just though about making a different thread for these two...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gulcrapek
http://www.arielcondos.com

The cousins across Broadway..

Good find Gulcrapek! I like them!

Here are the renderings and an article...




Extell's Broadway towers are dissimilar


25-OCT-05

Renderings of the two condominiuim apartment towers that Extell Development Company has begun constructing facing one another on Broadway between 99th and 100th Streets indicate that they are very dissimilar.

The projects are known as Ariel East and Ariel West. Extell names it projects after stars.

Ariel East is a 37-story, 64-unit tower at 2628 Broadway designed by Cetra/Ruddy Incorporated and it features 7 setbacks facing Broadway and many corner windows.

Ariel West is a 31-story, 73-unit tower at 245 West 99th Street and 2633 Broadway designed by Cook & Fox and it has few setbacks and its slab from recalls that of 30 Rockefeller Plaza. It is a mid-block site that was formerly occupied by a Gristede’s store that collapsed during demolition injuring several pedestrians.

The two towers will significantly alter the northern skyline of the Upper West Side that heretofore has been dominated by the Riverside Church at 120th Street and Riverside Drive, the Master Apartments on Riverside Drive at 103rd Street and the Columbia Apartments at 275 West 96th Street.

Extell is also developing the Orion at 350 West 42nd Street and the former Stanhope Hotel at 985 Fifth Avenue and Altair 18 and Altair 20, condo conversions in Chelsea at 32 West 18th Street and 15 West 20th Street, respectively. Gary Barnett, a principal of Extell, was a principal in the recent purchase of a large property at the southern end of Riverside South, the huge development by Donald Trump.


Copyright © 1994-2005 CITY REALTY
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 26th, 2005, 09:34 PM
krulltime's Avatar
krulltime krulltime is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manhattan - UWS
Posts: 4,219
Default

Took some photos today...

Ariel West:



Ariel East:



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old October 26th, 2005, 10:53 PM
czsz czsz is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: new york / boston
Posts: 1,079
Default

I'm so glad these are happening. These were awkward little sites for the longest time.

I wish there were hope for the west side of the block between 110th and 111th, but it seems that Commerce Bank has expensively rehabbed the building, so little will likely come of it for the time being. The southeast corner of 109th may have potential though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old October 27th, 2005, 12:39 AM
krulltime's Avatar
krulltime krulltime is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manhattan - UWS
Posts: 4,219
Default

Yeah there are so many lots that I see with potential all along on broadway.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old October 27th, 2005, 10:49 AM
NYatKNIGHT's Avatar
NYatKNIGHT NYatKNIGHT is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Manhattan - South Village
Posts: 3,781
Default

Are the buildings on the corners coming down or are those renderings just not showing them?

Thanks for the photos krull.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old October 27th, 2005, 11:05 AM
krulltime's Avatar
krulltime krulltime is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manhattan - UWS
Posts: 4,219
Default

You know I notice scafolding on some of those buildings but I ask a worker and he said the scafolding is just there to protect them. So they are not coming down.

It is just that lot you see on the photo for Ariel West... and for Ariel East they will leave the theater like it is. Thats how they gain more high. They bought the air rights.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old October 27th, 2005, 11:15 AM
Fabrizio's Avatar
Fabrizio Fabrizio is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tuscany
Posts: 5,217
Default

What a shame.

Upper B´way was for so long distinquished by it´s mix of tall and low buildings. It kept a certain intimacy and small neighborhood feel.... but at least these new towers aren´t so bad looking. Compare them to that 1970´s thing at 96th.

Last edited by Fabrizio; October 27th, 2005 at 11:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old October 27th, 2005, 11:21 AM
krulltime's Avatar
krulltime krulltime is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manhattan - UWS
Posts: 4,219
Default

No! The Art Deco Metro Cinema is not going to be destroy.

No buildings are coming down. There was nothing really special on those lots.

I think these towers are fine... tall and glassy yeah.

I am all on conserving the nice old buildings myself but for new ones... they have to be modern and interesting looking not trying to pretend to be an old gem.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old October 27th, 2005, 11:24 AM
Fabrizio's Avatar
Fabrizio Fabrizio is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tuscany
Posts: 5,217
Default

Sorry I didn´read carefully and changed my post... actually the tall stepped-back tower is really nice....majestic.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old October 27th, 2005, 05:25 PM
czsz czsz is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: new york / boston
Posts: 1,079
Default

Quote:
Upper B´way was for so long distinquished by it´s mix of tall and low buildings. It kept a certain intimacy and small neighborhood feel
It kept it looking patchy and neglected. There's intimacy in a 4-story townhouse next to a 15-story apartment building, but it's not the first word which comes to mind when I think of the 1-story taxpayer buildings nestled between 20-story towers...its appearance was rather more one resembling missing teeth, especially when compared to the majestically unified sweep of West End Avenue nearby.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old October 27th, 2005, 05:46 PM
Fabrizio's Avatar
Fabrizio Fabrizio is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tuscany
Posts: 5,217
Default

In fact West End ( like Riverside) was another story...all residential, no business, a quiet boulevard of important doorman buildings....with no street life.

B´way was a MIX of low buildings and tall...lively and kind of funky...that was it´s identity.... a lot of those small buildings were really beautiful and eccentric... the Zabars building is a good example of one that has remained. As I said though, these two towers at least look good and I´m glad to see that the Metro will be saved.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old October 28th, 2005, 03:24 PM
czsz czsz is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: new york / boston
Posts: 1,079
Default

I'm all for buildings like the one Zabar's is in, but undistinguished one-story boxes like those being replaced by these towers have been the bane of Broadway for decades.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old October 28th, 2005, 03:43 PM
ablarc ablarc is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 9,417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by czsz
I'm all for buildings like the one Zabar's is in, but undistinguished one-story boxes like those being replaced by these towers have been the bane of Broadway for decades.
Banks are prime offenders. They occupy corner lots with single-story crap.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old October 28th, 2005, 08:25 PM
czsz czsz is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: new york / boston
Posts: 1,079
Default

The fact that many of these buildings are now occupied with banks (or their doppelgaengers, Duane Reade pharmacies or cell phone stores) has more to do with the recent trend adopted by certain corporations to blindside the competition and steal their market share. You see the same proportion of them in any sort of building in Manhattan. It really doesn't help though that the big banking chains, which are capable of meeting any high rent demand and even sustain losses to that end to hold onto their market shares, can in that way effectively stave off eviction and therefore any new development on those sites.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old October 28th, 2005, 08:40 PM
NoyokA's Avatar
NoyokA NoyokA is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,279
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabrizio
What a shame.

Upper B´way was for so long distinquished by it´s mix of tall and low buildings. It kept a certain intimacy and small neighborhood feel.... but at least these new towers aren´t so bad looking. Compare them to that 1970´s thing at 96th.
Are you talking about the building at the northwest corner of 96th and Broadway?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2007, 2628 broadway, 2633 broadway, ariel east, ariel west, broadway, cetra/ruddy, cook + fox, extell, hugh o'neill building, upper west side, west 99th

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
East Harlem nyc26 New York Real Estate 4 October 12th, 2009 08:21 AM
Con Ed site on the East River Edward New York Skyscrapers and Architecture 1228 September 26th, 2009 04:53 AM
The Middle East Map for Palestine LF22 News and Politics 193 June 29th, 2008 12:43 PM
225 East 34th Street and 245 East 36 Street Morrissey New York Real Estate 4 August 26th, 2005 12:11 PM
East Coast Greenway ZippyTheChimp New York City Guide For New Yorkers 0 June 9th, 2003 10:37 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 PM.




Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.