Go Back   Wired New York Forum > Skyscrapers and Architecture > New York Real Estate

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 20th, 2006, 09:13 PM
krulltime's Avatar
krulltime krulltime is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manhattan - UWS
Posts: 4,219
Default 33 West End Avenue at West 61st Street - UWS - by Costas Kondylis

No rendering at all, but is almost finished...


From the Real Deal:


Quote:
Originally Posted by Developers race to the skies with a dozen UWS projects
4. Senior Citizen Housing, 33 West End Avenue at West 61st Street
Atlantic Development Group is building a 13-story subsidized senior citizen facility with an entrance on West 61st Street. Residents, 50 percent of whom will be from the area, will be chosen by lottery. The building is entirely inclusionary housing and will be managed by the Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty. The project includes 8,400 square feet of retail space.

5. Freedom Place South and West 61st Street
A 211-unit rental building is under construction on a newly created street at Riverside South, west of West End Towers.

From CB7:



Last edited by krulltime; February 20th, 2006 at 09:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 20th, 2006, 09:14 PM
krulltime's Avatar
krulltime krulltime is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manhattan - UWS
Posts: 4,219
Default

February 20, 2006:







Last edited by krulltime; April 15th, 2007 at 11:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 20th, 2006, 09:17 PM
krulltime's Avatar
krulltime krulltime is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manhattan - UWS
Posts: 4,219
Default

I better create a new thread for this one. So please discuss here.

I think it is ok. But I would not call it horrible. It compliments what has already been built on West End Avenue on the north. Although I am glad is not too tall.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 21st, 2006, 12:00 PM
Peakrate212 Peakrate212 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 263
Default west end

I think its fine.......safe, but attractive - if a little bulky in the middle.

Look - its better to encourage building over here, which was a no-man's land of parking and garages and save whats left in midtown (56th street, Automat, churches). Its important for the City to grow - I am not antidevelopment at all - It should just be done smart - The whole far west side can be redeveloped without destroying anything of signifigance (FYI - i live there). Lets preserve the few survivors that are threatened now and push for development here. Are you listening Mr. Tierney ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old February 21st, 2006, 01:13 PM
Derek2k3 Derek2k3 is online now
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 3,829
Default

It fits in with the crap in the area.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old February 21st, 2006, 07:48 PM
antinimby's Avatar
antinimby antinimby is offline
Build 53W53
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peakrate212
Look - its better to encourage building over here, which was a no-man's land of parking and garages and save whats left in midtown (56th street, Automat, churches). Its important for the City to grow - I am not antidevelopment at all - It should just be done smart - The whole far west side can be redeveloped without destroying anything of signifigance (FYI - i live there). Lets preserve the few survivors that are threatened now and push for development here. Are you listening Mr. Tierney ?
Very true, but if I'm correct, the people in the area were fighting against development as well. So what can you do?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek2k3
It fits in with the crap in the area.
No, no, no. That's the wrong way of thinking. Just because there were crap in that area doesn't mean we should add more crap. We want to improve and make things better. Here we have a clean slate, we should have forward thinking and make this a terrific and lively neighborhood so that 100 years from now, people will love it so much, they'll fight once again to save it from developers that at this point aren't even born yet.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old February 22nd, 2006, 09:59 AM
ablarc ablarc is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 9,417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peakrate212
...its better to encourage building over here, which was a no-man's land of parking and garages and save whats left in midtown (56th street, Automat, churches). Its important for the City to grow - I am not antidevelopment at all - It should just be done smart - The whole far west side can be redeveloped without destroying anything of signifigance (FYI - i live there). Lets preserve the few survivors that are threatened now and push for development here.
On balance, these are not great times for New York's architectural distinctiveness. In recent months, we may have gained Hearst, a new Columbus Circle, Gwathmey's Astor Place building and a start on NY Times and Bank of America, but we've lost the East River power plant, the 57th Street Automat, 2 Columbus Circle and maybe those great beaux-arts townhouses. Treading water, or maybe worse?

If you think about it, the buildings we're losing are diverse, the stuff we're gaining is less so.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old March 1st, 2006, 10:39 PM
krulltime's Avatar
krulltime krulltime is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manhattan - UWS
Posts: 4,219
Default

From the top of the Empire State Building. March 1, 2006:



Last edited by krulltime; April 15th, 2007 at 11:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old March 26th, 2006, 12:35 AM
krulltime's Avatar
krulltime krulltime is offline
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Manhattan - UWS
Posts: 4,219
Default

March 26, 2006:





Last edited by krulltime; April 15th, 2007 at 11:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old March 28th, 2006, 05:42 PM
vc10 vc10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 261
Default

Behind this building, on the railroad side, there is some odd construction, including a cylindrical structure that seems to be right on top of the railroad cover.

It's probably visible from the West side highway, although saw it viewing it from the end of W. 64th St.

Anyone have any ideas? Is it a recreation area for the old-folks home?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2006, 33 west end avenue, costas kondylis, upper west side, west 61st, west end avenue

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
440 West 42nd Street at 10th Avenue - 60 Story Tower - by Arquitectonica krulltime New York Real Estate 518 November 21st, 2009 09:59 AM
10 West End Ave - UWS - Condo krulltime New York Real Estate 1031 November 15th, 2009 07:44 PM
325 Fifth Avenue - New 40 Story Condo - by Stephen B. Jacobs Group londonlawyer New York Skyscrapers and Architecture 194 September 1st, 2009 08:32 AM
1765 First Avenue at 91st Street (34-story apartment tower) krulltime New York Real Estate 57 February 23rd, 2009 08:04 PM
Tower 31 - 9 West 31st street - 41 stories - by Costas Kondylis NYCTowers New York Skyscrapers and Architecture 18 October 13th, 2008 04:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 AM.




Edward's photos on Flickr - Wired New York on Flickr - In Queens - In Red Hook - Bryant Park - SQL Backup Software



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.